Galleries

Results 601 - 625 of 1334

<< Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next > End >>

Author:José H. Carvajal
  Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 23:30:26 EST   Queridos amigos, congratulation!   ZoneZero es mi site favorito por favor incluyanme en su mailing list mi nombre es Jose H Carvajal, soy un estudiante de fotografia en la ciudad de California ademas tengo un centro cultural que habrio sus puertas al publico el 10 de Diciembre nuestra meta es dar a conocer valores latinoamericanos, ya sea artes platicas, fotografia analoga o digital, musica y poesia.   Me gustaria tenerlos como mentors de este proyecto ya que soy de poca esperiencia.   Atentamente, jose carvajal.  
Sunday, 17 February 2002
Author:Melody Shekinah Winnig
  Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:26:46 -0500   I spent the past two weeks in the Sierra Madres and area around Puerto Vallarta. I was so impressed with the bounty of artists there and I kept telling people about your site, both as a place to visit and also about the wonderful community section where they might consider posting photography.   Thanks again.   Melody Shekinah Winnig   "As we are liberated from our own fears, our presence automatically liberates others." Nelson Mandela  
Sunday, 17 February 2002
Author:Cmdte. Hector Coba
  Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:56:51 -0500   Antes que nada, muchas gracias por leer tan rápido mi e-amil, es de gran motivación para uno que todo el equipo de ZoneZero este pendiente de una nueva admiradora de el arte de la fotografía. Y si, quisiera que la información me la manden por el sistema html, por favor.   Un gusto de nuevo poder conversar con ud. PAO COBA chaiton  
Wednesday, 13 February 2002
Author:Zone Zero
  The writer Carlos Monsivais talks about the book being presented in homage to Alvarez Bravo.   Fourth Mahler Symphony at the Palacio de Bellas Artes. Lisent audio (QuickTime Audio 336Kb) Audio of the orchestra and public engaged in singing "las mañanitas" in honor of Alvarez Bravo, right after the concert. Manuel Alvarez Bravo as he prepares to cut his birhtday cake with 100 candles   Among the hundreds of photographer present: (from left to right) José Hernández Claire, Hector García and Sebastian Salgado,while Enrique Villaseñor chooses to photograph instead the pretty legs of the girl standing next to him.   Go to the article: "Manuel Alvarez Bravo: Ironizing Mexico" by John Mraz   http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/mraz/happymab.htm  
Tuesday, 05 February 2002
Author:John Mraz
    The most renowned photographer in the history of Latin America, Manuel Alvarez Bravo is the cornerstone of this art in Mexico. When he began photographing in the 1920s and 1930s, artists who constitute a veritable “who’s who” of the lens immediately acknowledged his innate capacity: Edward Weston, Tina Modotti, Paul Strand, and Henri Cartier-Bresson. The respect that he engendered was encapsulated in Cartier-Bresson’s response when someone likened Alvarez Bravo’s imagery to Weston’s: “Don’t compare them, Manuel is the real artist.” Alvarez Bravo’s unique eye was such that the founder of surrealism, André Breton, sought him out in 1938 to commission an image for the cover of a surrealist exhibition catalogue (he complied with the famous La buena fama durmiendo [The Good Reputation Sleeping], but it could not appear on the cover because of the full-frontal nudity). His recognition by such luminaries notwithstanding, Alvarez Bravo had little visibility within the U.S. prior to the modest 1971 exhibit at the Pasadena Art Museum in California, which later passed through New York’s Museum of Modern Art without causing much of a stir. Subsequent exhibitions at the Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. (1978) and San Diego’s Museum of Photographic Arts (1990) made Alvarez Bravo a much more familiar figure, and his consecration was assured when he returned to the MOMA in 1997 for the definitive exhibit of 175 photographs. When Alvarez Bravo began photographing in the 1920s, the cultural effervescence that followed the Mexican Revolution (1910-1917) had unleashed a national search for identity, and the question of what to do with Mexico’s inherent exoticism was the burning issue for photographers. Perhaps influenced by his relationship with Weston and Modotti, Alvarez Bravo was the first Mexican photographer to take a militantly anti-picturesque stance, and he achieved international recognition for work which reached creative heights from the late 1920s through the mid-1950s, a period during which he perfected a sophisticated approach to representing his culture. Conscious both of Mexico’s otherness and the way in which that has led almost naturally to stereotypical imagery, Alvarez Bravo has always swum counter to the stream of established clichés, using visual irony to contradict what he initially appears to saying, hence inviting the viewer to engage in the task of interpretation. Consider Sed pública (Public Thirst), the 1934 photo of a boy drinking water from a village well. This image contains all the elements necessary to make it picturesque: a young peasant, dressed in the white clothing typical of his culture, perches on a battered village well to drink the water which flows from it; an adobe wall behind provides texture. But, the light in the image seems to concentrate itself on the foot that juts forward into the frame, a foot that is too particular, too individual to be able to “stand for” the Mexican peasantry, and thus represent their other-worldliness. It is this boy’s foot, not a typical peasant’s foot, and it goes against the expectations of picturesqueness raised by the other elements, “saving” the image through its very particularity. A similar tactic can be observed in Señor de Papantla (Man from Papantla, 1934), where an Indian stands with his back to the wall, facing the camera. Here, as with the image of the boy, the objective elements in the photo would seem to make it picturesque: white peasant clothing, bare feet, and adobe walls, as well as a sombrero and bag woven of reeds. But, having awakened our anticipation of the exotic, Alvarez Bravo cuts back against it with an artistry that rejects the facile. The man refuses to dignify the camera by returning its look. It is often felt that the esthetic strategy in which the subject “retorts” the camera’s gaze is that which most effectively represents people at their most active, because it negates somewhat the camera’s tendency to reduce them to objects. But here, Alvarez Bravo gives us another turn of the screw by presenting us with an Indian who, in looking away, seems to say disparagingly: “Take all the pictures you want, outsider. Who cares what you do?”       Alvarez Bravo’s search for mexicanidad (Mexicanness) led him to reconfigure national symbols. For example, Arena y pinitos (Sand and Pines) is an early image from the 1920s that demonstrates that a young Alvarez Bravo was much influenced not only by pictorialism, but also by the then pervasive interest in Japanese art. Infusing international art forms with Mexican meaning, Alvarez Bravo creates the background to his “bonsai” with what is in essence a mini-Popocatepetl, one of the volcanoes that dominate the Valley of Mexico. Another example is the 1927 photo of a rolled-up mattress, Colchón (Mattress). Here, he chose not to use the beautifully textured, folkloric petate which, woven of wide reeds, provided depth to the still lives created by Modotti and Weston. Instead, Alvarez Bravo photographed a modern mattress, but with the twist that its bands of shading make it look like the well-known Saltillo sarapes. In his recurrent imagery of the maguey cactus we can see his interest in playing with a ubiquitous symbol of Mexican culture; in one photo he “modernizes” the maguey by making it appear as if the central flower stem that sprouts from these plants has been converted into a television antenna.       The politics of Alvarez Bravo are always talked about in relation to his most famous photograph, Obrero en huelga, asesinado (Striking Worker, Assassinated, 1934). Nonetheless, while it is certainly true that he rejects officialist nationalism as completely as he does the picturesque, this image is problematic: its meaning is determined by the title ascribed to it, which may have been influenced by Alvarez Bravo’s involvement in LEAR (League of Revolutionary Writers and Artists) during the 1930s. I would argue instead that the politics of Alvarez Bravo -- and his search for Mexico’s essence --could better be found in the ways he represents the daily life activities of humble people, rather than in overt social commentary. His imagery is a modest, almost transparent portrayal of individuals who he seems to have “found” within their natural habitats rather than to have “created” through conspicuous visual rhetoric. A very understated esthetic that avoids overt expressivity, Alvarez Bravo’s is an all but invisible technique designed to capture anonymous people in ordinary activities, where they are neither romanticized nor sentimentalized. A perfect instance is La mamá del bolero y el bolero (The Mother of the Shoeshine Boy and the Shoeshine Boy), an exquisite image from the 1950s in which a mother visits her son to bring him lunch, and eats with him while he rests from his tasks of shining shoes.     Manuel Alvarez Bravo has been a definitive influence on Mexican and Latin American photography. His rejection of facile picturesqueness, his insistently ambiguous irony, and his redemption of common folk and their daily subsistence have marked out a path of high standards for photographers from his area.   Capsule Biography Born in Mexico City, 4 February 1902. Attended Catholic school from 1908 to 1914, but left in 1915 to work. Begins to educate self in photography, asking advice from photography suppliers, and learning English by reading the labels on developer bottles. The 1923 arrival of Edward Weston and Tina Modotti are crucial to Alvarez Bravo’s development, and he buys his first camera in 1924. Wins first major award in 1931, and decides to pursue photography as full-time career, in part as a still photographer in cinema productions. Meets André Breton in 1939, and his work is included in a Paris Surrealist exhibit. In 1942, the Museum of Modern Art (New York) acquired their first works by Alvarez Bravo and, in 1955, his photographs were included in Edward Steichen’s Family of Man. During 1959, Alvarez Bravo stopped working in the film industry, and became the photographer of important art books for the Fondo Editorial de la Plástica Mexicana, of which he was a founder. Alvarez Bravo left the Fondo in 1980 to work with the Mexican-based media empire, Televisa, where his collection of photography was exhibited and published in a three-volume set. In 1996, Alvarez Bravo’s collection moved to the newly created Centro Fotográfico Alvarez Bravo in Oaxaca City, Mexico.   John Mraz Go to: Happy 100th Birthday Manuel Alvarez Bravo!!         http://zonezero.com/magazine/articles/mraz/alvarezb.html    
Sunday, 03 February 2002
Author:Pedro Meyer
    I must admit that I am more than just a bit puzzled by the survey we have been conducting here in ZoneZero regarding the expectations our audience has, regarding how long film will be around. By a considerable margin (60%), most of you have considered that film will be around forever. So let us look at some of the facts that tell us exactly the opposite.   But before we go there, let’s first define some of the terms we are using. When I hint at the idea that film will not be around for very long that does not mean that I think film will vanish from the face of the earth, without a single roll being available after an imagined date. No, film will probably be made as long as there are a large enough number of cameras around that need film to operate, while still being profitable to produce by someone. But, when the consumption numbers start to dwindle (as they already have started to do) rest assured that the diversity and options of available film will begin to disappear dramatically. Remember those who produce film, do so solely to make a profit. If their incentive tends to dissipate, no more film. That simple.   The second important aspect to define is that the issue is not a cultural one, as many of you would have it. Although we have produced up to now cultural goods with the use of film, the defining reality for the future of film is strictly a market and business decision.       If this is the case, we need to look in the right place to evaluate such a future for film. We would do well to stop viewing these matters from the romantic and nostalgic perspective of something that we had gotten used to using. Where, some view these issues with a strong passionate attachment. But think about it, even if you love film, if sufficient numbers of people take to digital photography as the numbers tell us, film is not going to be around forever. Isn’t VHS on the way out also, replaced by DVD’s?       The movie industry is moving in the direction of replacing film with digital solutions to supply their theaters with the needed materials for projection. Instead of sending expensive cans of films to thousands of theaters, to which one needs to add the cost of transportation, let alone the logistics of having the films in the right place at the right time, etc. As soon as some theater chains start to make the transition to digital, the flood gates are opened, because for the most part the technology is already there to have such digital transmission. We are also getting news daily of new feature length films that are being shot entirely with digital cameras and no more film.   The medical establishment is also moving away from film based x-rays. All this would leave as the main outlet for film, the amateur photography market. Needless to say, the professional market all together worldwide is really a trivial consumption number for film manufacturers, that is, compared to that of amateurs. You already have seen how ID pictures have been replaced by Polaroid offerings, which in turn will be replaced by inkjet solutions and digital cameras. School yearbook pictures, a big industry throughout the world, is going digital as well. Then we have most major newspapers also through out the world moving into the digital realm.   This last year digital cameras have outsold for the first time ever, film-based cameras. The turf for film based cameras that used to be still photography, has now also been invaded by digital video cameras, which double up as still cameras while allowing us to make video as well.       The technology to replace film is advancing at an ever increased pace, so much so, that new digital camera models are rolling out faster than we can read the manuals of how to use them. There is not a single traditional camera manufacturer who has not been getting their feet wet in the river of digital cameras coming out of everywhere, it seems that today the camera industry is no longer defined by the traditional film based camera makers of yesterday. You have new names such as Sony, Hewlett- Packard or Epson, making cameras, just to name a few. Minolta, one of the world leading camera manufacturers just announced that they are moving all their R&D (research and development) money from their APS ( Advanced Photo System) film based technology over to digital, because that is where they see the future.   Who would have thought that the market valuation (the total amount of shares outstanding by a certain company, multiplied by the market price of those shares at a given time) of that venerable bastion for the production of film, called KODAK, is lower than that of Apple Computer, Inc. With these numbers the market is telling us that the future for Kodak is much less promising than that for Apple. Historically the leader in one era does not lead the charge into the next one. So far Kodak has fumbled from one digital solution to the next, as they never really wanted to embrace with much enthusiasm a future that would cannibalize their previous breadwinners. One might have empathy and understanding for their predicament, but the competition is relentless and unforgiving. If the issue were up to Kodak alone, I am sure there would be film forever, but they are not the only ones defining such a reality, thus we have to look at the larger picture.   We have to ask ourselves if we will be well served or not by these projections. Obviously the photographers who love film will never agree that this possible demise of film is anything other than a disaster.       I have been working now with digital solutions for the past fifteen years, and all I can say is that I am mesmerized, every day anew, at the potential and the unending array of possibilities that accrue to those who have taken the leap into the world of digital production. The last time I used my darkroom was 12 years ago, and have never had to look back a single day.   A University that is reorganizing their facilities to teach photography to 400 students approached me recently. They wanted to know how best to set up their traditional dark rooms. I looked at them, and asked whom are these students going to work for when they get out of college in 4 years? Because I want you to know that the number of places where they can go to work after they graduate, that will still be using the traditional methods of production is going to slowly disappear. How can you in good conscience train them with technologies that are no longer going to be used? Was my question to them? They got the message, and will probably move over to digital technologies because they need to train people for the future not the past. Think of the advertising world, the printing industry, newspapers, editorial industry, news media, they are all going digital.   So how long will film be around? I don’t envisage for very long, if you think of the new FOVEON technology that has just been brought to market with chips that offer even higher resolution than film, and doing so at prices almost to the level of the consumer market. Even Kodak has singed up for these new chips, to introduce them in their line of cameras.   So do yourself a favor, if you haven’t already done so, start exploring with digital cameras.   Don’t worry if this is the right time, or if it is better to wait for a better camera later on, rest assured that the moment you bought any new digital camera it was already obsolete the moment you purchased it, you cannot get ahead in this game. What you can do is get ahead in your own game, and that is to learn as fast as possible all that these new technologies have to offer. You will have much to gain from doing so.   I just finished printing some images that I took during the first Woodstock like Rock Festival we had here in Mexico, 31 years ago (the pictures in this editorial belong to this body of about 50 images). This work has never been seen, because when I took the pictures at the time, all I could afford to use was bulk film. Unfortunately that process, scratched the film while loading it into the canisters that would go into my camera, I had some interesting images, but the negatives were unusable to print from because of those ugly dark lines running across the entire picture. In addition some of these negatives were over exposed or under exposed, (we then worked with no automatic exposure meters). They were unusable as I wrote, that is, until today when with digital technology none of these problems mattered any more and I could salvage all that work.   Please share with us your points of view. I am sure you will have much to contribute to this debate.     Pedro Meyer February 2002 Mexico City   For comments post a message in our forum section at ZoneZero         http://zonezero.com/editorial/febrero02/february.html      
Friday, 01 February 2002
Author:David Arriaga
  Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:06:57 -0600   Gracias Pedro, de hecho ya estaba pero no en la versión html. Me sorprendió que tu personalmente seas quien responda. Esto hace que el sitio tenga para mí un valor mayor -no es el típico sitio muy bien diseñado pero fríamente alejado de los seres humanos que lo elaboran o que lo visitan. Te felicito y agradezco tu trabajo. Mi gusto por la foto se complace cuando veo ZoneZero.   Por cierto, hace tiempo puse como tapiz de mi compu una foto de unas calaveras de muertos que tomé del sitio. Ingratamente no recuerdo de quién es. Y resulta que me cambiaron el equipo y desapareció el tapiz. ¿Teacuerdas de quién es, para buscarla y volver a ponerla?   Un gran saludo desde TVUNAM,   David Arriaga Depto. de Difusión y Vinculación  
Thursday, 31 January 2002
Author:Roy L. Flukinger
  Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:19:48 -0600   Dear Pedro,   I figure I have owed you a fan letter for some time now.   Thank you for ZoneZero, which we have been pleased to receive since its inception. Students and researchers who have accessed it here from the Center have also been very enthusiastic about its many issues and insights.   This month's contents have been no different. From the excellence of your editorial and Mraz's piece on Alvarez Bravo to the sad idiocy of the Wigoder essay, your contents are always illuminating and well worth the read. Pray continue with such excellence.   And if the resources of our Collection may be of future assistance to you please do not hesitate to let us know   Sincerely yours,   Roy ------------------------------------ Roy L. Flukinger Senior Curator of Photography & Cinema Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center Box # 7219, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713 www.hrc.utexas.edu/photography  
Thursday, 31 January 2002
Author:Nikki
  Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:19:50 EST   Hello,   Please could you add me to your mailing list.   I am so glad that I am writing to someone real, I think that is what has drawn me to your site, something real.   I must admit I rarely use the internet, outside of checking my mails, even though I am fairly young I seem to have an aversion to all this technical stuff... anyway I am very glad I found you. I was looking up a site from Gerd Ludwig and somehow bumped into Zone-Zero. I'm just finishing a 3 year photography degree in the USA, my intention is to become involved in enviromental and charitable projects, so finding you is a real gift. Now I have the opportunity to see what other people are doing and to be motivated by their good work.   Look forward to hearing all the news and visiting the site often   Best Wishes   Nikki.  
Sunday, 27 January 2002
Author:Itzel Aguilera
  Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:16:19 -0600   Hola Perdro Meyer:   Permítame primero felicitarlo por el desarrollo que se ha mantenido en esta revista virtual y por mantener siempre fresca esta página.   Solo que no he podido revisar todos los artículos anteriores que se han publicado acerca de la fotografía documental y la fotografía digital, ni las discusiones que se han suscitado al respecto, así que quisiera saber si puedo acceder a ellos com una forma de consulta a su documentación...   Soy Itzel Aguilera, fotógrafa. Acabo de terminar un doctorado en Barcelona y estoy de regreso en México inicio mi tesis, el proceso en el que estoy ahora es el de documentarme lo más y mejor posible. Mi tema de tesis está situado en la dicotomía documental/digital de la fotografía.   Específicamente me interesa estudiar todo lo que hay desde la foto documental hasta el proyecto documental todo esto dentro del arte contemporáneo que se hace desde la década de los noventa hasta lo que vemos actualmente o propósito de las nuevas tecnologías.   Me interesa muchísimo además contactar con Usted y de ser posible en un futuro que fuera posible que usted me respondiera algunas preguntas a manera de entrevista formal como base y apoyo de mi tesis.   Los cuatro fotógrafos que me interesan sobre todo para destacar el carácter documental de la fotografía son Eugene Smith, Robert Frank, Alfredo Jaar y Pedro Meyer.   En fin, le agradezco infinitamente su atención y espero una respuesta a esta petición.   Itzel Aguilera.  
Friday, 25 January 2002
Author:Ezequiel Muñoz
  Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:11:39 -0930   Mi nombre es ezequiel muñoz y enocntre vuestra pagina la cual me aha parecido muy interesante. Generalmente no me quedo en sitios fotograficos que tienen mucho texto, pero zone zero es la excepcion, los editoriales muy interesantes, los portfolios, la calidad , me han dejado muy satisfecho (debo seguir volviendo pa terminar de recorrer sus paginas) Soy fotografo, de buenos aires, argentina.Y junto a un amigo hacemos una revista solo de fotos (EMviciones) la cual esta en la web tambien, y seria un placer si les gusta, mandarles algunos numeros.   Pueden darle una vista en www.emviciones.freeservers.com desde ya gracias por vuestra publicacion, y un deseo de paz en este 2002   ezeq  
Sunday, 20 January 2002
Author:Guadalupe Pérez
  Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:23:42 -0700   sres de zonezero antes que cualquier cosa, pues reciban una felicitacion por la creacion de tan esplendido espacio para la foto, y creanme que por aca en cd juarez chihuahua, hace falta derponto un oasis como este enmedio de tanto desierto. Y bueno para ir al grano, mi duda es sobre el envio de material para que pueda ser publicado en zonezero.   Un poco de mi. De formacion antropologica, termino ganandome la vena fotografica, y llevo diez anos ya desempenandome dentro del fotoperiodismo, viajando por el pais. He publicado en diversos medios -jornada,milenio,tierra adentro,proceso, etc- y bueno para no hacerlo mas largo, me gustaria compartir con vostros un poco de las imagenes que a lo largo de un ano de estadia en esta ciudad fronteriza he podido captar. Digamos que intentaria algo asi como un mosaico de Juaritos -que es el nombre local de la ciudad- y para esto quisiera saber a que resolucion-tamano-etc hay que enviar el material.   Esperando su respuesta me despido.   J GUADALUPE PEREZ  
Thursday, 10 January 2002
Author:Damara Hall
  Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:06:36 -0800 (PST)   I would be interesting in registering with you so that I might be on your mailing list. I didn't have much time so I had to explore your website quickly, but I liked what I saw. I was initially caught byt he fact that it is in both English and Spanish and it was for this reason that I gave it a closer look. I'll definately be back for more. And again, please register me.   Damara Hall  
Tuesday, 08 January 2002
Author:ZoneZero
    Seydou Keita, legend of African photography, dies     Seydou Keita, one of Africa's leading 20th Century photographers, has died.   Working in his hometown of Bamako in Mali, Keita established himself as an inventive portrait photographer during the Forties, and his studio became famous throughout west Africa. Here he developed his trademark style, often dressing his clients in intricately embroidered robes and posing them against patterned backdrops on a chaise longue, or sitting on a scooter. His work is represented in the UK by Hackelbury Fina Art in London. A retrospective of his work is planned for the Studio Museum in Harlem in the Netherlands next year.   You can see an exhibition with the work of this great photographer in our Gallery section.   ZoneZero         http://zonezero.com/magazine/news/keita.html    
Monday, 07 January 2002
Author:Pedro Meyer
    The image above was taken at a wonderful Natural Science Museum in La Plata, Argentina, which I was led to believe housed the world's largest herbivore dinosaur, the Argentinosaurus. It didn't, but a few interesting anecdotes related to that visit are worth mentioning.   This plant eater, weighed in at 100 tons, with 130-140 feet in length (40-42 meters) and dates back some 100 million years ago. A spate of mysterious monster finds has placed Argentina on the paleontology map in recent years. Fossilized discoveries over the past decade include Giganotosaurus, the largest dinosaur carnivore; Argentinosaurus, the largest herbivore; and other bones that suggest an even longer species. Thousands of eggs dating back 80 million years litter the land, a discovery that includes the first known impressions of dinosaur embryo skins. "We already recorded that this egg fossil horizon extends more than 20 kilometers. That is the largest dinosaur-nesting site in the world," said Coria, a native Patagonian and paleontologist at the Carmen Funes Museum.   The dinosaur heritage of Argentina may be richer than that of the United States and Canada combined. But natural history programs in the south lack the financial power of their counterparts in the north. Some Argentinean museums must leave dinosaur bones outside and behind their buildings, lacking the money to display them.   "They (Argentineans) have the bones, the Americans have the money," Flessa (former president of the Paleontology Society) said.   Natural history museums in New York, Los Angeles, Atlanta and Alberta, Canada, have sponsored expeditions throughout Argentina, working together with institutions in Buenos Aires and Patagonia.   As Argentinean law forbids the export of dinosaur fossils, the display uses bone replicas. Flessa said the lack of original parts hardly matters.   "The techniques for making replicas of fossil bones are so good that it almost doesn't matter where the originals are any more," he said. "I don't think that science is hindered by the fact that the Argentinean government won't let dinosaurs outside the country."   The Atlanta museum boasts the first complete display outside of Argentina of a Giganotosaurus, which in the 1990s dethroned T. Rex as the largest known land carnivore.   Hall Train of Dinosaur Productions has lent his skill to reproduce copies of the Argentina dinosaur bones for Fernbank. The dinosaur reconstruction specialist has already produced some impressive works.   Train helped create a $20 million Triceratops for the Jurassic Park display at the new Universal Studios theme park in Orlando, Florida.   "It walks, pees, farts, and breathes. People think it's a real animal," Train said...   The fossil bones have been reproduced in fiberglass and suspended on an iron frame. The finished skeleton weighs several tons.   "We began in a disaster, by casting the largest vertebrae of Argentinosaurus." Lessem (head of the project to reconstruct the two skeletons at the Fernbank Museum in Atlanta, Georgia) said. "The first giant (plastic) bone arrived on Halloween 1998 at Logan Airport in my home town of Boston. It had been smashed to pieces by customs agents who thought it was a modern sculpture possibly containing hidden drugs."   Only 10 per cent of the Argentinosaurus' remains were uncovered from a pebbled-filled block of sandstone. Among them, however, was a piece of the largest backbone ever found – a 1.6 meter high and wide vertebrae which weighs 20 tons. In all, paleontologists recovered a dozen backbone vertebrae, a few limb bones and part of the hips from this one dinosaur.   The obvious conclusion to this story is that in Argentina were the real bones remain, there was nothing much to be seen much to the dismay of my 6 year old child who was disappointed not to find the Argentinosaurus for which he had traveled half way across the world, and in Atlanta where they only have an animated replica, a curious public does find the inspiration to satisfy their imagination, by looking at a fiberglass representation that "walks, pees, farts and breathes".       The Victoria and Albert Museum     When you enter the hall of the "fakes" at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, one is confronted not only with Michael Angelo's masterpieces, among many others, but with the following wall label:   Room 46 Fakes and Forgeries In the 19th century when the Museum was acquiring many of its Medieval and Renaissance masterpieces, it was also purchasing copies, fakes and forgeries in imitation of them. A selection is shown in the central gallery, displayed in cases of about 1870 in a gallery of 1873, redecorated in its original colors. The objects on display range from straightforward "modern" copies of 16th century pieces, acquired by the Museum purposely as copies, and examples that were deliberately made to deceive and evidently did so. Between these two extremes lie works that were produced as modern pastiches of earlier styles –some of which were sold by later owners as thentic examples– and objects that are in part of early data but which have been adapted,   decorated or otherwise "improved". In some cases scientific investigations of materials and techniques or historical and  ocumentary evidence have revealed that the object is not authentic. In other cases uncertainty remains and a few such examples are included here. Often, however, both the choice of the sources used by the faker and the intrusion of stylistic features of his own period show a work to be of later data.Like the casts in the courts on either side, the objects shown here reflect the taste of the 19th century, offering us a Victorian vision of the middle Ages and the Renaissance.       We can glean from this information that reproductions have always been part and parcel of Museums, that the issues regarding a Dinosaur are not that separate and distant from having the statue of David before our very eyes. During the modern era when quality color reproduction in a printed medium became of age, the reproduction of paintings became how most of the world stood to gain access to the works that remained beyond our immediate reach.   Books became a medium of choice to have the work of photographers become known around the world. It was 30 years before I ever got to see an original print by Henri-Cartier Bresson. But then wasn't the "original" print, also a reproduction? Didn't we always call such prints original-reproductions?     The photograph   Aside from the obvious issues of representation that the previous examples make reference to, let us explore now the picture on the cover at ZoneZero. It was taken at the Museo del Plata de Ciencias Naturales, with a small digital camera (Epson 3000z) set at it's widest angle, however, the wide angle lens distorted the angles towards the back of the room, giving it the effect of almost falling over towards the left as can be seen in the image below. When I took the picture, I was careful to align at least one area parallel to the sides of the image ( the cabinet windows), I settled on the left side and let the rest fall where ever it might, knowing that I could fix it later on.       Such a picture in pre-digital times would have required a view camera to correct such a distortion. Today we have the benefit of being able to put the image back to the correct angle such as it was in reality, but we do it using a computer. The benefits are obvious, greater ease of operation with less stuff to carry around and a more modest camera and lens can be used. The results? you judge yourself and compare. Those who have a long history and attachment to a view camera will find such a solution unacceptable.       Conclusion   As I see it, we have been caught in a web of our own making, discussing endlessly the issues of representation. On the one hand are all the debates around the veracity of the image for the sake of factual representation, crisscrossed by all the emotional and moral considerations related to being or not, deliberately mislead in what we think we are looking at.   On the other are all the art market issues related to the original as a way of placing value on objects and their rarity. If we all own the same identical piece, what is to give it a significant variance and therefore premium? if at all. My earliest now fading digital prints, which no one wanted because they were fading due to the inherent limitations of the prevailing inks at the time, have now acquired the distinction of being "vintage" prints, even though faded. What originally was a defect became over time a source to differentiate the work from more recent and better reproductions. Such are the workings of the art market.   Our notions of representation with respect to digital photographs have also been beset with misunderstandings borne out of misinformation. The idea that all digital pictures have to be altered is to not understand the medium at all. The notion that all alterations have to be seen alike is again a lack of understanding that not all alterations are born the same.   I would argue that the original matters only when certain conditions are met. It matters to the art market for reasons explained earlier, it matters to someone who is using the original as proof of something; it does not matter, however, when the information derived from the work is understood for its subjective nature, or for the purpose of educating, or entertainment.   Share with us your points of view in the forums, tell us how you see these matters and how our world is being transformed in its formal representation.   Pedro Meyer January 07, 2002 Mexico City   For comments post a message in our forum section at ZoneZero         http://zonezero.com/editorial/enero02/january.html      
Monday, 07 January 2002
Author:Lily Díaz
  Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:58:53 +0200   Estimado Pedro Meyer:   Soy artista y diseñadora y trabajo como instructora en el Media Lab de la Universidad de Arte y Diseño de Helsinki Finlandia.   A través de los años he leído con entusiasmo las editoriales y artículos de su revista Zone Zero. En muchas ocasiones me he servido de este magazín electrónico para mantener al tanto a mis estudiantes y colegas sobre la calidad del trabajo de los artistas de orígen Latinoamericano.   Por la presente, me gustaría recomendarle a Ud. el trabajo de Tania Jimena Rodríguez. Tania es una diseñadora mexicana que acaba de completar sus estudios en nuestra universidad. Habiendo obtenido altas calificaciones, el departamento de diseño gráfico otorgó a Tania un premio especial por su labor realizada en el trabajo para el grado de maestría: "The Metaphorical Clock, Towards a Visualization of Michel Foucalt's Concept of the Episteme".   En dicho trabajo, realizado en formato impreso y también como una aplicación en el Internet, Tania utiliza el diseño gráfico, la fotografía, y las nueva tecnologías con el fin de hacer visible dicho concepto filosófico. Entre las fotografías utilizadas, se encuentran las suyas propias y además multiples fotografías de la reconocida revista italiana Colors, cuyo permiso Tania obtuvo.   El trabajo se encuentra accesible al público en la siguiente URL:   Aunque este ni es un trabajo simple, ni fácil de entender, creo que contiene unas ideas profundas las cuales se manifiestan no en la palabra escrita sino a travéz del uso, en combinación, de los distintos medios, como la fotografía. Por tanto, creo que pueda ser de interés tanto para Ud. como para los lectores de Zone Zero.   Sin ningún otro particular, me despido deseándole un féliz y próspero 2002.   Sinceramente,   Lily Díaz     ------------------------------------------- Lily Díaz Researcher Media Lab University of Art and Design Helsinki/UIAH 135C Hämeentie SF 00560 FINLAND  
Thursday, 03 January 2002
Author:Maria Aguirre
  Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:49:28 -0500   Hola, soy una argentina viviendo y trabajando en The School of the Museum of Fine Arts of Boston. Soy la persona encargada del funcionamiento e impresion de un Iris Printer 3047G con tintas American Pinnacle. Hace un par de meses que vengo chequeando vuestro website y creo que es uno de los mejores, y el respeto y seriedad por el trabajo de otros. Felicitaciones y espero recibir sus email pronto. muchisimas gracias   Maria Aguirre  
Tuesday, 01 January 2002
Author:Chris Lentz
  Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 18:24:51 -0800   To whom it may concern, Right now I am a photographer living in Los Angeles working as an animator. I graduated from Rhode Island School of Design in 1993 with a BFA in painting. I just recently discovered Zone Zero. Thank You!   It is an inspiring collection of work, one of the best I have seen on the web. Would you be so kind as to add me to your mailing list.   Again thank you. Sincerely, Chris Lentz  
Tuesday, 01 January 2002
Author:Armando Bona
  Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:21:28 -0500   Thank you Pedro for these beautiful pages that you post on the internet for all of us to study and admire. I do so much look forward to them and what they have to say.   Abrazos, Armando Bona  
Friday, 21 December 2001
Author:Tony Bridge
  Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 23:04:40 +1300   Pedro:   You may remember we spoke( E-spoke? ) some time ago about young people and technology, when I was wearing my other hat as a photography teacher. Well you were right and I was wrong. This last year has seen a huge change o the part of my students, who have(mostly) grabbed hold of digital and run with it. The blocks in the road have been all mine... but you know what they say-the worst kind of smoker is an ex-smoker.. and I have jumped onto the bandwagon.   A story..I have just finished a project photographing the young night life of our city, pushing the envelope as far as I could. I used an hybrid technology, shooting on pushed 800 ISO neg and using a film scanner, then outputting through a Fuji frontier....What was interesting was that the scanner/P-Shop approach gave me far more control technically than I would ever have had using a wet darkroom... But the project came to an end as I pushed conventional technology and documentary approaches as far as I could.   And still I had not reached the point where i was dealing with what was important to me, namely being able to depict the other that I saw around me, the sense of an alternate and somewhat bizarre reality that lies beyond....the life of the city   Then a friend turned up on my birthday with your book Truths and Fictions, and in your work and that wonderful essay by Joan Fontcuberta, I began to grasp a new way of thinking, and to realise what a profound shaking I was getting...so now there is a way to put feathers on buildings, and to document my own reality( which, in spite of my trying to be objective and cheat reality and Heisenberg I was doing anyway).   Anyway, to the point of this Email. I have just built a website for myself, and in it I have included a reference to ZoneZero. I hope you will not mind. Perhaps if you have time you would check it and, if you take issue, i will change anything to which you take exception.   The link is http://www.silvereye.co.nz Kind regards Tony Bridge  
Tuesday, 18 December 2001
Author:Tantra
  Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 18:47:40 -0800   Hello, I would like to register with ZoneZero, as you may have guessed by now. I am thrilled to find experimental photography which is good, digital images that don't just make me feel life isn't very appealing. Because I do digital photography myself, but have been embarrassed to come out and say it too often in the presence of photographers. They can be so upset by the very idea of it. So to save the species, your site comes along, with quality art photography which is not exclusive, but reaches out to all the ways we can combine materials and approaches and come to something new and even breathtaking.   I am sending five of my own pictures for consideration in the portfolio section.   Thank you, Tantra.  
Tuesday, 18 December 2001
Author:Johnny Mobasher
  Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 14:17:35 +0000   please register me. i think u offer a great service to all kinds of photographers.   a fantastic platform.  
Wednesday, 05 December 2001
Author:Maria Eugenia Alonso
  Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 19:43:27 -0300   Soy María Eugenia Alonso de Argentina,,,   Los felicito infinitamente por este espacio, que a cada visita renueva mis ganas de hacer cosas. Les cuento que soy diseñadora gráfica, hace un año que estudio fotografía, y me estoy dedicando a las realizaciones artísticas en el medio digital, más bien una mezcla: fotos tradicionales escaneadas y trabajadas, ya que aún no poseo toda la tecnología digital (solo la compu).   Bueno, el tema es que através de ustedes me enriquezco y descubro un lugar donde compartir mi interés por este tema. Es verdad que aún no hay plena conciencia de las ventajas del proceso digital de la fotografía, (aquí la mayoría de los cursos enseñan solo la forma analógica) y hay veces que, yo como principiante, me siento fuera de lugar, ya que me manejo más con el lenguaje digital que con los procesos tradicionales. Mientras tanto, sigo aprendiendo por mi cuenta y encuentro en internet el mejor modo de informarme y conectarme. Les agradecería que presenten datos sobre concursos, becas y cursos en la red, que me puedan ayudar a desarrollarme.   Muchas gracias por todo lo que hacen, me gustan mucho las editoriales de Meyer, y la amplitud en la selección de trabajos. Quiero compartir con ustedes mis fotos, así que pronto las enviaré.   Un beso grande y mucha suerte. Eugenia.  
Tuesday, 04 December 2001
Author:Pedro Meyer
    The fall out of what happened on Sept 11th has had repercussions in so many unanticipated ways; one of these has to do with taking photographic materials with you as you travel by air.   In an excellent technical information bulletin prepared by Kodak here with enclosed, in html format, we can learn of all the perils of having your film go through the regular X-ray machines at airports. WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND that you read it.   Airport Scanning.pdf   For those of you who are still film enthusiasts, you will be able to notice that using film is not without its problems. In this respect it appears that digital cameras, no universal panacea either, have a strong advantage over film. In particular when the airport security checks, have multiplied like a plague. I have gone through as many as three different x-ray machines on my way to board a plane.   As we reported in last month’s editorial, a digital camera’s picture file survived unharmed the collapse of the World Trade Center, whereas film based cameras fared rather poorly in having its film survive.   What is going on at airports with all the security checks seems to have become a true example of bureaucratic lunacy. The idea that you could kill or threaten someone aboard the plane with finger nail clips or a small key chain pocket knife, just because the terrorists of Sept 11th had cardboard cutters, does not seem to be very sophisticated thinking.   Anyone could, if that was their purpose, make a very sharp knife out of a broken bottle of alcohol or perfume sold at any Duty Free shop, or take the power cord of any of the thousands of computers or hair dryers allowed aboard planes and strangle someone.   Why not forbid belts, they do in prisons. It would be hilarious to see many passengers loose their pants, if belts were no longer allowed aboard planes. Or how about, the disposal cigarette lighters that are being sequestered from one’s luggage destined for the cargo area of the plane, while allowing the identical lighters to go on board in the hand carry on bags or pockets of passengers. I suppose setting the plane on fire in the passenger compartment might be less of a danger.   On board airplanes they replaced metal knifes with plastic ones, but I ask myself as I cut very easily into the chicken on my dinner plate with the plastic knife handed to me, what is the difference between that chicken and someone’s throat? If it cuts into the chicken, it would surely do its job on my throat if someone had such evil intentions.   Now they even stopped serving wine from bottles that have a cork in them, as corkscrews are no longer allowed on board. I can just see a terrorist use a corkscrew as a weapon; the threatened passenger would probably die of laughter at such a ridiculous threat.   Just take the glass out of your eyeglasses and you can have a sharp edged knife, which could then be attached onto a wooden handle, which would have been allowed on the plane, bingo, you have the equivalent of a paper cutter.   Billions of dollars will be spent, on what seems to be a total charade. None of this is really a deterrent for terrorism on board planes. We cannot afford to let all of this nonsense to continue unchallenged, we deserve security not placebos. The cost of all this useless security in case you had not noticed will be passed on to us in the form of higher air fares.   The photographic community does a lot of traveling, and it is in our own best interest to voice our opinions on this matter. I don’t expect too much will come out of it, but a voice here and a voice there, will probably in time rise the consciousness to what is going on.   We wish all of you dear readers, that you and your families enjoy a safe and wonderful holiday season.   Pedro Meyer December 03, 2001 Mexico City   For comments post a message in our forum section at ZoneZero         http://zonezero.com/editorial/diciembre01/december.html    
Monday, 03 December 2001
625. Nora Luzzi
Author:Nora Luzzi
  Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 04:49:54 +0000   Acabo de conocerlos, me interesaria recibir todo lo que sea informativo soy argentina, restauradora de obras de arte y artesana, docente y responsable del taller de restauracion del museo legislativo de la CAMARA DE DIPUTADOS DEL CONGRESO DE LA NACION, ARGENTINA, ME INTERESA TODO LO RELACIONADO C CURSOS BECAS INTERCAMBIO DE CONOCIMIENTOS, ESTOY A SU DISPOSICION.   NORA LUZZI  
Saturday, 01 December 2001

<< Start < Prev 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next > End >>Page 25 of 54


Share This
|
More