Galleries

Results 426 - 450 of 1334

<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

426. Don Michie
Author:Don Michie
  Date: August 10, 2005 3:50:34 PM   Please register me to receive your newsletter.   I am studying photography as a night school student at Ryerson University in Toronto. My interests are documentary and street photography and also portraiture. I shoot medium and large format and am transitioning into the digital world.   I have had zone zero bookmarked for some time and browse regularly for inspiration. Your site is particularly interesting because of its international scope. Please keep up the good work.   Regards   --   Don Michie Whitby, ON L1N 6Z8 Canada  
Wednesday, 10 August 2005
Author:Zhu Gang
  Date: July 31, 2005 5:06:56 AM   Hello Zonezero.com   Nice to have met you in the net:-) I'm art director from dpnet.com.cn which is a popularity digital photography website in China. Many exhibition in your site are wonderful I like very much.We need these information and plan to introduce them to our Chinese people. So aftertime,I'll often ask your permission:-) Of course I'll send the mail to author too.   Good Beginning:-) Best Wishes!   Zhu gang http://www.dpnet.com.cn  
Sunday, 31 July 2005
428. Aphorisms
Author:Pedro Meyer
    "I am surprised that there are still discussions going on concerning the superior quality of film, because those people who so argue usually do not understand what digital photography is, or have not even used digital media." *** "Those critics that dismiss digital photography, barely knew about photography before, and do so even less today." *** "Digital technology is to analog photography what a life guard is to someone drowning." *** "Children are very wise, they appreciate the advantages of instant feedback in their creative process, that is why they dismiss cameras that use film." *** "Writing (or drawing) with light", has ceased to be a metaphor for the first time in history." *** "It's very gratifying to take pictures without having to spend money for each shot." *** "Film based cameras are like a mortgage, with payments for the rest of your days as a photographer." *** "Digital technology has kept me from continuing to pollute rivers with the chemicals I used in the dark room." *** "Color entered my life like springtime, thanks to digital technology." *** "Still photography stopped being like a silent movie." *** "My work reverses the cinematic notion of moving pictures since it redefines itself as "still cinema", a process that, like memory, distills multiple visual impressions into a single paradigmatic image." *** "The computer screen is amongst other things also a space that functions as a stage, I am the director, I move the lights, the actors and decide where all things go. This is also how I can create pictures today." *** "I was not able to take pictures of my dreams before." *** "The photographer is, at the end of the day, a storyteller." *** "Not all blind people see the same things." *** "The aura of "the real" in photography is a fiction, therefore it is ironic to try to uphold such a notion by attacking digital photography arguing that it is a fiction." *** "The decisive moment has been evolving, so that today it is so much more than just an instant." *** "We should acknowledge that the idea of a "photographic truth" was a great exaggeration." *** "We used to have color in Ecktachrome, Kodachrome, Agfachrome, Fujicolor, etc. and, then they tell me that photography was a truthful representation of reality?" *** "Photography is useless to tell stories that are specific." *** "There are more telephones that can take pictures than all combined analog or digital cameras." *** "The number of photographs published on the web is greater than the total number of photos published in all printed media." *** "The chromatic quality of a photo displayed in a computer screen is superior to any kind of photo printed on paper." *** "Photography was always a witness of it's own veracity. Something that in legal terms is untennable. No one can be a witness to itsel." *** "Who would have thought that my photographic camera would also record sound or that a video camera could make still photos or that the telephone could do both, video and stills." *** "Film has disappeared as quickly as vinyl records or the VHS format." *** "My entire photographic archive has taken on a new life, not only with all the images that I have been able to rescue from damage, but also by correcting exposure, color or definition defects that either occurred originally or are due to the passing of time." *** "It is less violent to eliminate someone from a photograph than in real life."   ***   Pedro Meyer   As always please joins us with your comments in our forums.         http://zonezero.com/editorial/septiembre05/september.html      
Thursday, 28 July 2005
Author:Pedro Meyer
    As I visited the Museum at the Palace of Cortés in Cuernavaca here in Mexico, I came across a statue with a one legged general. Ever since I discovered that the left leg belonging to the general had been buried with military honors, I have asked myself in which exact part of the human body does dignity and glory reside. During the burial of the leg—a part of his that had been with him in his heroic acts as a General and had always climbed steep hills with him— I was told that a bugle boy played taps while a battalion carefully aligned among the trees of the cemetery, presented arms. The extremity was deposited in the family crypt in a special coffin, and every year on the Day of the Dead, the general would arrive at the graveyard to bring flowers to that part of his body, which had departed ahead of him.   The general would not cry for that portion of himself, but rather sit there and recall the deeds that they had shared together, those were not only war scenes, but also days of dancing at the Officers Club. He would wonder about that part of his own body that had already marched ahead to eternity, he pondered if it might have alighted in heaven or gone to hell. He would stare at the tomb, giving thought to the idea that he now had to follow his leg to hell, or if in fact might catch up with it in heaven.   This story, which I told some years ago, at a conference in California I related to the internet and how we perceive in a Macluhanesque metaphor the computer as being an extension of our body. However this same story comes to mind again only this time in a different setting altogether, as I sit here pondering what happened to my "street photography" pictures that I have been creating over the last few decades in contrast to what I am doing today.   One could safely place my work in the category of street photography, which is were for the most part, my work takes place. However today, these pictures are not necessarily concluded at the same stage they were before. That is to say, once the image had settled into the films' emulsion, that was it, what was done later on in the dark room would alter things in ways that were rather limited. Today, the image captured by the camera might just be the starting point for the creative journey. Although not all pictures are being transformed further within the computer, many images are indeed being altered to various degrees in ways that go beyond what the darkroom would enable.     It is quite obvious that the skills and criteria that are required for the two settings, the street on the one side, and working with a computer on the other, have to be evaluated with a new set of ideas in mind. Leading the way to the notion of asking "in which part of the the image does dignity and glory reside", in other words. What I photographed in the street or what I did with the image after having worked on the picture in the computer.   Is the term of "street photography" even applicable under such circumstances?, I believe such a question might be a fairly important one to ask.           My intuition tells me that of course it is still "street photography" in so far as the spirit and interests which led me to capture a specific moment, is still present. The only thing that really has changed has to do with an aesthetic representation. I then started to look back in time, and came to the conclusion that since the advent of photography, technology has always been transforming the aesthetics of street photography. Each new film that would come out or the luminosity of a lens, for instance, would allow us to do things in different ways, and places. The color that was captured was forever changing with each new generation of film that was brought to market.   For some reason, all those gradual changes offered by the technology at the time (mainly, lenses and films), which would affect when we photographed, what we photographed and how it looked to the eye, were never questioned as much as they are being today, because after all such modifications took place in front of the camera lens. It isn't that there were no technological changes over time, which would transform the aesthetics of street photographers, regardless if they were working in color or black and white, because indeed they were always present, but that having such changes take place in the time/space before the image was captured, vs. the, after the image was taken, has made a big conceptual difference.   However the tempo that exists in making the street picture is certainly very different to the more contemplative mood in front of the computer screen. The question then is, would the work done in front of the monitor be the equivalent to the time spent working in the dark room?   If we can come to the conclusion that this is so, then it's very likely that after all the general's leg together with his body will find their common resting ground in the hereafter, much as the term street photography will have come to terms with the work done on the street in combination with a computer. If the computer is the equivalent of a dark room on steroids? then I believe what is going to take place is that we have to reshape our discourse to allow for a very fresh approach to street photography.   It will probably take another six to ten years, for the curators, critics, theorists and so on, to fully work their way through all these questions in order to arrive at some meaningful understanding of the photographic discourse that is being transformed as you read this. Therein lies one of the biggest challenges, to absorb into the very same process of what is being described, the on going changes underway thus leading to a good answer to the question: " in which exact part of the human body does dignity and glory reside?"   Pedro Meyer July 5, 2005 Coyoacan, Mexico City   As always please joins us with your comments in our forums       http://zonezero.com/editorial/julio05/july.html      
Tuesday, 05 July 2005
Author:Pedro Meyer
  In cooperation between the G.Eastman House Museum in Rochester, (New York, USA, and ZoneZero, we have the pleasure to bring up this hand tinted daguerrotype that is in their collection. As was pointed out to me by Anthony Bannon, the Museums' Director, it's very interesting to see the way journalism was described by the head of photography at the LACMA (Los Angeles County Museum of Art).   Pedro Meyer   Robert Sobieszek, writing in Masterpieces of Photography From the George Eastman House Collections (Abbeville Press, 1985) p. 48, declared about George N. Barnard’s Fire in the Ames Mills, Oswego, New York, 1853: “The daguerreotype of the Ames Mills fire is a rare example of daguerreian journalism…Despite the blurring of flame and smoke in Barnard’s views, the sensitive application of colored pigments furnished his picture with a unique sense of the instantaneous.”   Barnard, George N. American (1819-1902)   DESCRIPTIVE TITLE: Fire in the Ames Mills, Oswego, New York   1853 Daguerreotype with applied color. 7.0 x 8.3 cm., 1/6 plate Museum Purchase; ex-collection James Cady GEH NEG: 5815 79:3107:0002   "On the morning of July 5, 1853, a devastating fire broke out on the east side of the Oswego River. ... Barnard took his camera outside to make at least two views of this terrifying spectacle. The first photograph, taken shortly after the fire was discovered, was made from the head of West Cayuga Street one block east of Barnard's new studio, looking southeast across the river toward the Ames and Doolittle mills. The small plates in the Eastman House collection are reduced copy daguerreotypes made for public sale from Barnard's larger originals. Since they are 'mirror images' of the original, laterally reversed daguerreotypes, these smaller plates read correctly. The daguerreotype of the Ames and Doolittle mills is delicately hand-colored, with crimson pigment added to the flaming buildings." [Keith Davis, --George N. Barnard,-- 1990, p. 28-29]   BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES: Newhall, Beaumont. --The Daguerreotype in America.-- Boston: New York Graphic Society, 1968. pl. 27.// Rudisill, Richard. --Mirror Image: The Influence of the Daguerreotype on American Society.-- Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1971. pl. 48.// Sobieszek, Robert A. --Masterpieces of Photography from the George Eastman House Collections.-- New York: Abbeville Press, 1985. p. 49.// Davis, Keith F. --George N. Barnard, Photographer of Sherman's Campaign.-- Kansas City, MO: Hallmark Cards, Inc., 1990. fig. 6.// Frizot, Michel. --A New History of Photography.-- Cologne: Könemann, 1998. p. 50.//   EXHIBITION HISTORY: "Images of Excellence", US, NY, Rochester, GEH - Brackett Clark Gallery, January 1 - April 26, 1987. (Traveled).// "Photography in Nineteenth Century America", US, TX, Fort Worth, Amon Carter Museum, October 26, 1991 - January 5, 1992. (Traveled).// "Reflections in a Glass Eye: Works from the International Center of Photography", US, NY, New York November 3, 2000 - March 18, 2001.//   INSCRIPTION: mat recto-(embossed stamp) "Barnard Oswego" verso-(on backing) "Fire at Ame's Mill, Oswego"   NOTES: Cataloged 11/83, DZ, updated 3/85, RAS.       Barnard, George N. American (1819-1902)   DESCRIPTIVE TITLE: Burning Mills, Oswego, New York   July 5, 1853 Daguerreotype with applied color. 5.7 x 6.9 cm., 1/6 plate Museum Purchase; ex-collection James Cady GEH NEG: 5814 79:3107:0001   "The second view was taken a short time later from a rooftop position two blocks south of his studio near the head of West Oneida Street, looking northeast. This latter view conveys the extent of the destruction along the riverbank from the center of East Oswego north to the harbor. The small plates in the Eastman House collection are reduced copy daguerreotypes made for public sale from Barnard's larger originals. Since they are 'mirror images' of the originals, laterally reversed daguerreotypes, these smaller plates read correctly. The daguerreotype of the Ames and Doolittle mills is delicately hand-colored, with crimson pigment added to the flaming buildings." [Keith Davis, --George N. Barnard,-- 1990, p. 28-29]   BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES: Sobieszek, Robert A. --Masterpieces of Photography from the George Eastman House Collections.-- New York: Abbeville Press, 1985. p. 48.// Davis, Keith F. --George N. Barnard, Photographer of Sherman's Campaign.-- Kansas City, MO: Hallmark Cards, Inc., 1990. fig. 7.// Hirsch, Robert. --Seizing the Light: A History of Photography.-- New York: McGraw Hill, 1999. p. 98.// EXHIBITION HISTORY: ""Permanent" Survey Exhibition - 19th Century", US, NY, Rochester, GEH - Second Floor Galleries, August 1979 - March 1984.// "Survey of the History of 19th Century Photography", US, NY, Rochester, GEH - Second Floor Gallery, March 1985 - April 1987.// "George N. Barnard: Photographer of Sherman's Campaign", US, NY, Rochester, GEH - North & South Galleries, May 17 - June 19, 1991.// "Eventful Camera", US, NY, Rochester July 24, 1999 - March 12, 2000.// "Reflections in a Glass Eye: Works from the International Center of Photography", US, NY, New York November 3, 2000 - March 18, 2001.// INSCRIPTION: mat recto-(embossed stamp) "Barnard Oswego" NOTES: Cataloged 11/83, DZ, updated 4/91.     http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/daguerrotipo/daguerrotype.html    
Friday, 20 May 2005
Author:Julian Gallo
    “Movies are life without the boring parts” Alfred Hitchcock   Moblogs (Mobile + Weblogs) demand to be published in chronological order, thus making photographs a symbolic set that is much more important and congruent than if the same pictures were to be put in a photo album, with a previous arbitrary selection.   In experimenting with the constant publishing of family pictures in a moblog –something only possible through cell-phones with a camera- I discovered that this apparently innocuous organization feature – a picture follows another, and the latest is the first that is seen published- was giving away a secret to me.   After 10 months of sending pictures every day to Textamerica (a rate of approximately 6.5 photos per day) I realized that I am making neither an album nor a web log, not even a moblog; I am making a map.     Albums   Historically, family photos have been kept in albums (including all the places where images could be stored, such as notebooks, folders, organizers, blank sheets of paper) for family remembrance or posterity.   The photographic rhythm is marked by meaningful events: Marriages, births, birthdays, trips, homecomings, graduations, visits from relatives… These situations offer opportunities for capturing relevant moments that later will be milestones in the family’s history.   These images will end up grouped in the family ‘s photo album.   This picture of two unknown children is published in the site “Look at me” This site receives anonymous photos found on the streets or flea markets, they are nobody’s pictures. Picture sent by Sam Miller   The opportunity to organize photographs within albums -an activity that in most cases was performed by the family’s mother- was a key moment in the construction of the family’s narrative. During this process the filers would prefer different kinds of order to the chronological order, placing these photos into many, many albums. The result would be a trip album, albums of family visits to different places, albums of the “little kid of the house” where the photos of the child would be taken out of context, seen through the months or years, also photo albums sent from faraway places by a relative.   It seems that chronological order and accuracy in notes and information never were a goal of family albums. This is a characteristic that probably is to blame for the fragmentary remembrance of a family’s history produced by these photo albums, which could only be explained by the remaining living relatives.   Chronos "What is time? If nobody asks I know, if anyone asks I don't." -San Agustin-   Contrary to the traditional ways of storing images, moblogs inflexibly impose the chronological order. Photos cease to be seen individually and become a true “family” of images, a photo follows another, that is the sister of the next one and so on. Sequence links the pictures, not their subject.   My son, Vicente, Two minutes later, my son Joaquin. The bottom picture was taken before. Published by JG in Textamerica   Used to seeing family photos with unclear dates, I discovered that the accuracy in the timeline that is offered by the moblogs could be the key in a different kind of family narrative.   Photos used to be dated by the photo lab and presented the date in which the photos were developed (The focus of the Nokia does not allow to see JUL 76K)   Document   As days go by (my moblog goes back to July 2003) I feel more anxious about losing the family photos and the relationship they have in the moblog. I have made allsorts of backups but I have the feeling of not possessing them, Until they are printed I feel these pictures do not exist completely; There is an non transferable documentary aspect in printing that cannot be escaped not by me or by the photos.   In attempting to store the photos I have published in Textamerica and Buzznet I have printed some mosaics that put together entire sequences of photos taken with a cell phone.     Either small or big, I do not think that family photos really “exist” until they are printed. It is most important for a family photographer to have a hard copy in any format, so they can grow old being somewhere around the house and not in a CD or a server.   In this sense, moblogs are not less limited than any other digital storing method. But they have instilled a new desire, to know in detail relationships, dates and captions. Even more, if, I could I would want to have the date and time of publishing and the time it was captured by the telephone. Even better I would like to have my pictures with the date and time in which they were captured by the telephone, not the time and date in which they were published in the server.       Snapshots   We used to take around 300 family photos each year before the telephones with cameras, now I take that number in 6 weeks.   When one of my children arrives from school, when we go out for a walk, when we go shopping, I take and publish a picture in any time.   While I walk with my son Pedro, we go by the MIguel Cane public library, where Jorge Luis Borges worked for may years. Pedro listens to my story and looks at the place.     Magnitudes   If I keep up this rate of photographing (6.5 family photos per day) I will have 2372 in a year. Strictly placed one after the other. If I decided to print all those photos in a 10x15 format costing $0.75 (in any currency) I would have to spend $1779.00. I would need sixty eight 36-photo albums of each, or twenty three 100-photo albums that would take most of my library. If lined up, these photos would be over 14 miles long. Just in a year.   My wife and I. I stretch my arm, look up and shoot as if photographed by someone else. This is one of the few possibilities of entering to my moblog without doing the typical self-portrait. Nokia in front of the mirror. Note: My wife is taller than me.     I can imagine my 23720 photos in 10 years as long as we don’t travel and no other family member decides to take any photos. In 10 years I would have 140 miles worth of photos. It would take 2 hours by car going to 62 miles an hour to see them all.     Cartography   In his text “Del rigor en la Ciencia” (On the rigor of Science, english version), Argentinian write Jorge Luis Borges imagines an empire whose cartographers are so deft as to manage to make a “Map equal in size to the Empire Itself” .Borges in the same text tells us that the following generations discovered the uselessness of such a map, and “ abandoned it to the cruelty of the Sun and the winter”.       (Original text and audio from the author)     I understand that my moblog , my map of family pictures will tend to turn into the map of Borges’ cartographers, Such accuracy renders the album useless. An album in which each day is divided into “6.5 chapters”.   This accumulation of photographs is so curious that when I revisit my moblog nothing draws my attention more than the missing photos, the unrecorded things. Then I ask myself “What happened between the supermarket photo and the photo of my wife in front of the computer? What did I see and not photograph that I don’t remember?”   No matter what I do or how I store it, my grandchildren or their children will leave these photos to the sun.     Julian Gallo gallo1@fibertel.com.ar   Julian Gallo is professor of New Media in the joint Master’s program of Journalism of the San Andrés University, Columbia University and the Clarín news group.         http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/jgallo/moblogs_time.html      
Tuesday, 17 May 2005
Author:Pedro Meyer
    (This is a double editorial because it covers two months.)     We place a marking on the wall, at each one my youngest sons’ birthdays, he is by now ten. He stands up against the wall and where the top of his head is, we draw a new line. That way we can visualize better how much he has grown from year to year. Of course we are aware of his changes as he outgrows his clothing and toys, however, these lines on the wall are what really provides us with a better perception of how he has been growing.   Although I have not performed an equivalent set of markers for all the equipment that I have used over this past decades’ digital revolution, I have to admit that my studio is littered with all sorts of obsolete tools, that are constantly being superseded with more efficient tools that are always outgrowing everything else. Nothing has lasted ten years that is still being used, which can give you some idea of the speed of obsolescence. Any equivalent markers on the wall would only show us, that this a relay race, with the new items displacing the old at ever shorter intervals.   Having to face this continuous obsolescence of ones’ equipment has become a new source of irritation and frustration, however, one can’t deny that there are indeed benefits from the improvements that can be had, very often at a much lower price ratio to what was offered before, providing new creative options which are after all the reason that all these tools get created and sold, in the first place.   There are a number of very well meaning people who have said to me, there is nothing “new” that is coming out in spite of all these digital tools (as in content of the photographs), which would justify all that is going on with digital photography.   I suspect that they are looking to find transformations delivered so fast because of the speed at which tools are appearing. Obviously this is not going to happen. This would be like expecting a tree to grow to it’s full size in the space of twelve months. We need to understand that new content can not grow by leaps and bounds, but organically. What is more, if you inundate a sapling with water and fertilizer just to speed it’s growth, it will most likely succumb to such a deluge of usually very helpful resources.   As we move forward, we are facing new challenges by the never ending diversity of new tools that are constantly flowing our way. The challenge is the time needed to learn about all the tools and possibilities they offer and how they work, and then putting it all into practice.   We have to also build a theoretical frame work, to understand the transformation of the image and how all these developments end up reshaping our social and cultural values in the process. We need to acknowledge how much around us has already changed, in order to deal with things in a way that helps us cope with this revolution . Who would have thought that the iPod would force the radio industry to rethink how they operate. To give just one brief example.   Lets face it, the main providers of our tools for photography ( soft and hardware) are no longer those who were the leaders of the analog photo industry. As a matter of fact the majority of the most important players in todays photo world had nothing to do with photography not too long ago.   Names such as Epson, who are in fact Seiko the watch makers, or Casio the makers also of watches and calculators, or Samsung, or Hewlett Packard, to name only a few of the main hardware makers did not even have photography as a business plan, nothing to say of Adobe the creators of Photoshop or Macromedia (recently swallowed by Adobe). Their presence in the world of photography is something new, and along with that, come new ways of doing everything, Just notice all those places that cameras are being sold that never before had sold a camera. Or all the objects that take pictures that did not even exist before. Cell phones, video recorders, computers. etc.   When someone addresses the expectations over the work being created and suggests that nothing really new has been produced so far, they are not factoring in that many of the tools that are in existence today, have only been with us, in their present level of sophistication, for only a scant few years. It’s like expecting a toddler who is still struggling with his potty training, to have written Don Quijote de la Mancha. And if a mother were to feel guilty that her child had not yet written such a masterpiece, then you would probably question the mother for being so unrealistic, or the person posing the question, would have to be confronted for the lack of understanding of what they were actually requesting.   Today more than ever, the arrival of new tools will in turn bring with them, new options for producing new photographic work.   Quite possibly there are no more than a handful of people in the world, who have come to use and experience all the intricacies of a product such as Adobe’s Photoshop. What this means is that the learning curve is quite huge, and to boot, is changing all the time.   Although I was working with digital images, a long time before Photoshop 1 came into being, and have used every new version since then (and we are now on version #9), I would venture to say that I don’t know how to use 40% of this product. However, it might just be that we will never need to know it all either, because increasingly this tool has abilities to do things that not everyone needs to use all the time.   This can tells us something of the dimensions involved in learning all the ins and out, of just one software package. But if you add another fifteen applications, some that will allow you to make video, to use sound, and to publish books and over the internet, and to write, and on and on the list grows, I think you get the picture of what it means these days to stay up to date.   In the last thirty days, a new operating system, Tiger, for the Macintosh, came out, along with a new version of Photoshop CS2 ( or version 9), Now expect to face a river of new upgrades by everyone as they adjust their software to work with Tiger, and you get the picture of how all of this is supposed to function. You have to be willing to learn new things from now on forward. This will never stop.   So in this editorial I will take you on a short ride of just a handful of new pieces to this puzzle of digital photography. And see how these tools are changing content.   I will start out by the most surprising of them all, the EPSON R-D1 model. This is the first digital range finder camera ( In the link above, you can see in five languages a wonderful 3 D presentation of the camera that has all the functionality of the real camera) It looks identical to a Leica M6, it even sound like one, and I am sure this is by design, as most of the Leica lenses will fit perfectly well. Even if the camera couldn’t take a picture, it’s already a terrific conversation piece, On a recent trip to New York, I got stopped everywhere there were knowledgeable photographers around. They would ask, is that the new Leica? I would have to tell them that unfortunately the company that made Leicas went bankrupt, had they produced such a model in due time they surely would have been doing well. It took an established watchmaker to create a camera that is as solid as the original Leica was. I am sure you get the idea of what the transition to digital photography represents.   As you all know the Leica M6, like it’s predecessors, was the perfect camera to work in certain ways and places. It’s simplicity was unique. With this being the first digital range finder camera, we might start to see some new work as well. Especially as digital technology allows us to work with poor lighting in so many ways that are better than ever before. I would not be surprised that this camera would bring some new images our way, just as Dr, Erich Solomon did in the early thirties.   This camera takes phenomenal quality pictures, 6.5 million pixels, and of course is almost silent, and light in weight. I don’t think there is photographer alive who does not wish that all the equipment they have, be as light as possible. The images I took were taken in RAW format, letting me have a 72 megabyte size file, after working on the images in the new Raw file format, which allow us to make huge prints that look razor sharp. The noise factor at high ASA ratings, like 1600 were almost negligible. Compare that to the recent fiasco at Kodak with their top of the line model, which they had to take out of the market and suspend any marketing efforts because their five times more expensive camera could not make images of any quality above a 100 ASA rating exposure.   But back to the Epson R-D1, which costs around $3,000 US Dlls. the images are of very high quality, the camera feels just right ergonomically, but then I believe in the excitement of getting the product to market, someone at Epson forgot to include, what even a $ 200 US Dlls. camera has and that is the capability to connect the camera to some outside device in order to download the pictures that were taken. In the R-D1 you can only do so by taking the memory chip out of the camera and inserting it in some other device that then allows you to download the pictures. I did so by inserting the memory card, into a Casio camera. Here the $ 500 US Dlls. camera had a solution the $3,000 (body alone) camera, did not provide.   Imagine a BMW car, were they forgot to include the inside door handles so you can get out of the car, and you could only do so, by lowering the window to stretch out your arm to open the door from the outside. For sure that is one way of getting out, but for your money your probably would want a better solution.   Not withstanding this flaw, I am sure there will be lots of camera collectors who will want this first of a kind camera, and then also a good number who grew up with the look and feel of a Leica will want to make digital images while using their old Leica lenses. All of these will want this camera.   Epson has proven time and time again, that even though they were not in the photo business before, they patiently listened to comments they got, and steadily improved everything and thus built up their market lead for printers that cater to the photography world, something not even HP has been able to challenge, So I am sure that in version #2 of their R-D1, they will probably lower the prices and fit out the camera so you can download right from the camera. Judging EPSON by their track record, I think that this camera is going to become a Classic. Sadly not made by Leitz, gmbh, Maybe Epson decides to buy Leitz gmbh, it would be a very interesting combination.   We now move on to another price range, with equally stunning news. The CASIO Z50 Exilim, Here the story gets interesting in a different way. As I was flying on my way to Germany, I went through the catalog of the stuff they sold in their on board duty free shop, I was thrilled to see that now all of a sudden cameras were an item one could buy even on a plane. Not too long ago, cameras were items sold only in camera stores, today cameras are being offered of course in most super markets.   So here was this CASIO camera, of which I had never heard off. It looked very interesting, the price was around $ 500 US Dlls with a little leather pouch to protect it. I asked the stewardess if I had the right to open it, and see if the camera was worth the money, and if I was not satisfied that I could return it. Right away she said yes, brought me the camera, and I was hooked. It was a lot faster than the Sony T1 I had bought a few months earlier. I knew that I always had a lot of people who want to buy my used cameras, (they can get a good price and a camera that is almost new) so buying a new camera was less of an issue.   The camera was great, 5 million pixels, unfortunately not in raw format, ( I expect will follow very soon). However, the camera had one major flaw, also in design. The buttons to change the settings all had been placed exactly on the same spot were my thumb would land when holding the body of the camera to take pictures, So inadvertently I would constantly change the settings. However aside from this flaw the camera made great images. Then in Madrid one day I lost the camera, and I was looking for it everywhere the following day when I missed it for the first time, when all of a sudden in comes this taxi driver who had taken me back to the hotel, from were I was teaching a work shop the night before. He had found it, but best of all, as he said, it was on the floor of taxi, and people did not see it, only he did so when he was cleaning his cab at the end of the day. As he said, if they had seen it, they would probably not have given it to him. I think he was right.   My next episode takes place in Dhaka, in Bangladesh, as my Sony T1 got lost there, Here I wasn’t so lucky. After exploring all the possible places I could have left it, we came to the conclusion that while riding in a rickshaw with all the inevitable bumps in the road, it could have easily jumped out of my pocket. (Sad to say the person who might have found the camera, will not be able to do much with it, as I still had the power supply which is needed to charge the batteries, and for downloading the pictures ) The Sony T1, did not have a view finder, only through the back monitor could you see what you were going to photograph, in a funny way it behaved more like an old bellows camera, with the rear pane acting like the usual matt glass to see the image you were about to take, or miss, as the camera was very slow in responding.   As you well know, the ever present debate that the still images do not reveal what is on the sides of that which is being shown to us in a photograph. I was taking this image of a man shaving in the old city of Dhaka, you can see here. However what you can not see is that I was surrounded by onlookers, where in fact I had become the object of attention, not the man shaving.   I took out my Casio camera and recorded a video of all that was happening on the periphery of the image being taken. As a testimony on the limitations of photography as a vehicle for showing “reality”. Take a look here and tell me which reality were we talking about?             Quick Time File 1.2 Mb, QuickTime 6.4 plug-in is required   Next stop: Singapore. Of course my friends there took me around shopping, and lo and behold I saw a new CASIO EXILIM Z57. This is now thirty days after I had purchased the camera on the airplane which was being presented as the latest and greatest camera in Europe, and here a month later was an upgraded version already with all the design flaws corrected, the camera coming in all sorts of decorator colors to choose from, and a larger monitor on the back. Same price.   This present us with the constant dilemma I have heard all over the world, When is the right time to buy a digital camera. My answer is always the same: NOW! because if you want to wait around for the return of the era when camera innovations happened over many years, that time in history is probably gone for ever. Your cameras should also be thought off in different terms. Since you are not spending on film anymore, you probably amortize the value of the camera in a relatively short period of time, allowing you to sell it for less that you paid for, in order to invest in the new models plus the savings you made from not spending for film.   The Casio Exilim, is fast, it has very good image quality. You can make videos with it, you can use it as a recorder as well. However, it does not work as a coffee maker nor can you use it to call someone at home. Those are the other type of cameras, called cell phones. Already phone cameras have arrived with a 2.5 million pixel capacity.   Well, I bought the new model, and sold promptly the one I had purchased 30 days earlier, you no longer can approach the ownership of your camera with the same emotional attachment of the past, unless you care more for the nostalgia bit, than for technological innovations. A camera is seen by me today in a totally new ways. I view them almost with the same detachment I have for a taxi. A taxi, I see as a way of getting me from A to B. I pay my fare, give them a good tip, and forget about the car ( unless the taxi driver, brings me back my lost camera the next day). Essentially the cameras have become almost a use and discard item.   So what does the Exilim from CASIO bring to the creative table? With a built in flash that is very good, it can do things, that the Epson R-D1 does not without additional equipment. The spontaneity of having a camera with you at all times, that is both silent, even more so than the R-D1 as I can turn down all sounds to zero, also has a view finder option aside from the rear monitor, a big plus compared to de Sony T1. I just read that Sony already came out with a new generation of the T1 version, that is faster, and has seven million pixels. All of this, is just to point out how fluid all these comments are, and how however up to date a review is, you can not hold on to the information too long.   I find that these cameras will usher in a new form of taking pictures, because of their size, speed, and angles from which the pictures can be taken. Let alone making videos, You might want to see an article we published some months back here in ZoneZero, of how a musician, Fredo Viola did a small film from just such a small camera. I believe it becomes quite evident when you see such fine work, as the “Sad Song” by Fred Viola that indeed we are going places that are new.   If you are trying to figure out why one camera costs $500 Dlls. the other one $3000 Dlls, and the last one I will review which is the new D2X from Nikon, $5,000. You can probably look at the car market as a reference. All cars no matter how much they cost, will take you from A to B. so you are not looking solely at transportation as an issue. You have prestige, comfort, security, and all other good reasons people like to buy one brand over the next one, or one model over another belonging to the same brand.   With cameras, there are of course certain very specific needs, such as very large file format, or certain speed, like 8 frames per second at any setting. So when people ask what camera do you recommend, the first question is always what do yo want to do with that camera. If you needs are to have one of the highest quality images in order to produce large size images, plus speed, then the new Nikon D2X, will fit the bill perfectly.   I find it quite amazing how in such a few short years, the increase in quality and size of images, has been made possible. To capture images a 8 frames per second, at 12.5 million pixels is quite a remarkable accomplishment.   The camera is however very heavy to carry around, at least for me. My wrists really feel it and so does my back, when I have gone out to take pictures for a long time. The Canon cameras I think are as much or more weighty, nothing to say of the digital Hasselblad camera. This to name only a few. Would I like to have all the bells and whistles with out the weight, of course I would, But then the trade off is probably to have it lighter, is to have less options.   One thing that is quite wonderful with the Nikon cameras is that they have been very consistent in having almost the same interface and buttons from one model camera generation to the other. Making it very easy to pick up the camera and without reading too much of the manual figure out where everything is. There have been photographers who had to go an assignment with their brand new DX2 camera, and being able to use it perfectly well, right out of the box.   The D70 from Nikon, which has now become the previous generation, is going to be replaced by a new model the D70S within a few weeks. The D-70 is considerably lighter and if you can, pick up a used one by all means try to do so, you will have great results and at a modest cost.   The benefits of instant feedback, has not been spoken about enough. I recall how we would waste an enormous amount of material with Polaroid tests, and aside from all the litter that was produced, it was always just a reference. Here the images are WYSIWYG ( what you see is what you get). You get to see exactly what your camera will be photographing and too boot, at no additional cost. Now you understand why Polaroid went out of business.   "Popular Photography says that Canon’s 16 megapixel EOS 1Ds Mark II digital SLR edges out film."   ***       Popular Photography Magazine, which isn’t exactly an apologist for digital photography. Has declared that in tests Canon’s new 16 megapixel EOS 1Ds Mark II, took better pictures than a regular shooting high quality ISO 100 film. They are saying that the better color and lower noise of the EOS 1Ds Mark II gives digital pictures the edge over film.     Have you tried the new lens baby version 2?, if not then do yourself a favor, and explore their web site, at http://www.lensbabies.com/ these lenses are absolutely unique, they will fit most models of didgital cameras, and it will convert your digital camera, in the equivalent of a Holga or cardboad pinhole camera,combined with a the old fashiond bellows camera, with the tilt.   You will obviously ask why, would I want to do that? make such images with the digital camera. First because you are interested in the style of images that such cameras deliver, but most importantly because you have the benefit of instant feedback as to what you are taking being along the lines of what you would like to get. Lastly because you have a lot more production power behind you, as you clip ahead, and gather the images that will work for instance with your fashion assignment.   -------------------   NIK Pro2 filters. This is a set of filters that do make a difference in your photography.   http://www.nikmultimedia.com   Their most important advantage is that you can apply the effect with a brush. No more, applying a filter to the entire image, even in those areas you would not want any change.   You can appreciate the impact of such tools, if you look at the image on the cover of zonezero, and then look here at the original without any alteration.     Aside the fact that they are very good filters, with very powerful, controls. What I found that was quite stunning, is that you can apply any effect with a brush, and undo what you just did, and do it over again, with only a click of button.   The idea of applying filters by hand selectively, rather than have it land all over the image evenly, regardless of your intention, is something that soon will make itself present in more and more work. The difference in using filters in this way is outstanding, when you consider the level of control that we have today over every pixel.   These filters are free to you if you buy the new Wacom tablet that has bluetooth connection, which frees you up from all the cable clutter around your computer.       What comes across with all the new tools I have reviewed here, and this is just a small sampling of all the things that are available at present. is that content is just waiting to be transformed. I am convinced that we are but at the very beginning of a new era for photography.   Pedro Meyer May 16, 2005 Coyoacan, Mexico City   As always please joins us with your comments in our forums.       http://zonezero.com/editorial/mayo05/may.html      
Monday, 16 May 2005
Author:Juliana Duque
  Date: May 13, 2005 9:56:21 PM   Hi, my name is Juliana Duque and i'd like to recieve news in html version regarding the website, it has truly inspired me. i was at a complete creativity plateau, brain blocked trying to find some form of inspiration. the opportunity to see what other people around the world are doing has given me some kind of boost, like im not alone in the search for images.   thank you Juliana Duque  
Friday, 13 May 2005
Author:ZoneZero
  In Memoriam Peter Pfersick Oakland, California     To a very good friend and photographer, who not only had a towering presence due to his height, but also through his gentle demeanor and profound respect for all cultures. A world traveler who was welcomed where ever he walked because he understood that he was always the center of attention by being so tall, and therefore needed to put those around him at ease. A man who would be capable of such intenese feelings that he could easily be moved to tears when thinking of those whom he loved and cared for. A man respected for his art, and his dedication to photography.   Visit the Peter Pfersick's exhibition "A vision of Latin America" in the ZoneZero Gallery.       http://zonezero.com/magazine/obituaries/pfersick/pfersick.html      
Tuesday, 12 April 2005
Author:Robert Long
  Jocelyn Benzakin died March 31   She was one of the liveliest, most honest, creative, interesting and pivotal people in the fast-moving field of photojournalism when it was at its peak. She began her career in New York in photography as a teenager, having immigrated from Morocco. She worked in several jobs, including at Time magazine, then founded and directed the New York office for Sipa Photos, one of the largest international photo agencies, and then created JB Pictures where she continued to come up with ideas for stories and nurtured some of the best talent in the business, including Peter Howe, Mark Peterson, Mark Asnin, Maggie Steber. Reacting to the New York rat race and the narrowing limits of photojournalism, she then founded the Sag Harbor Photo Gallery, where she exhibited a great deal of photography, particularly documentary photographers such as Burt Glinn and Gilles Peress, and the work of younger, unrecognized talent.       Jocelyne Benzakin A Passion For Photography By Robert Long - East Hampton Star Published by permission of the East Hampton Star © 2000 East Hampton Star   "To me, photography is art," said Jocelyne Benzakin, who shows some of the most important photographers of the past century at the Sag Harbor Picture Gallery. "Art is anything you do with passion. It could be a chef that invents an incredible cake." "What we have here," she said, pointing at a beautiful old wooden cabinet painted a faded rose in her Wainscott house, "is art. I can feel the spirit in it. You can feel the passion. Or Pollock - you can feel his passion, his anger; you can feel him in his work." "Alfred Stieglitz, Minor White, Paul Strand - it's about passion." Ms. Benzakin has shown all of those photographers, plus Gilles Peress, Henri Cartier-Bresson, and dozens more who made fine art photography what we know it to be today. Crossing Boundaries She's also on the lookout for younger photographers, and shows their work as well. Some visit her gallery with their portfolios; others come by word of mouth or when she visits Web sites and photo expositions. Of the difference between photographs that resonate with the viewer and those that don't, Ms. Benzakin said that fine art photography "comes from a different part than someone buying an Instamatic and pushing the button. It can motivate you. Some people use photography as a simple tool to make a salary and have less passion because they do the same thing every day. And you can see that. The photos reflect it." Some photojournalists are able to cross that boundary. W. Eugene Smith, whose photo essays for Life magazine on everything from war to a day in the life of a country doctor, "had a foot in both worlds," Ms. Benzakin said. "More Than Just Pictures" "And someone like Gilles Peress - his work is journalism but it's also art. He's a classic, and just gets better and better. They are much more than just pictures." "When you pick up Peress's book on Bosnia you become a victim of the book. It's that strong. You forget who you are and feel the pain of Bosnia. You simply can't put it down." Ms. Benzakin believes that great photographs have an impact unlike that of any other record or recreation of important events. "When you think of World War II or Vietnam, well, we've all seen so many movies about all that, but I think of the pictures. They are what come to mind. You remember the naked girl running down the street after a napalm attack, the man being shot in the head on the street. Photography registers on a different level, it goes to a different part of your brain than movies." Grew Up In Morocco "Photography is much more important than we think. When I think of John Kennedy or Bobby Kennedy, it's pictures I remember." Ms. Benzakin, who is in her 50s, started the gallery in 1995, but she's been involved with the medium as a photographer, an agent, and a dealer since she was a teenager. She grew up in Morocco, where her parents had moved from their native Algeria "because they were killing Jews there." Her father worked as a photographer. "He did the tourist agency photos, he photographed the King. He was quite a name. But this was Morocco; there were not too many photographers there." Childhood Fascination "Probably unconsciously I became interested in photography as a kid; I used to hang around my father's lab. I spent a lot of time in the darkroom, fascinated by the process." In Morocco, she said, "there was a lot of anti-Semitism. I was the only Jew in my class at school. 'Benzakin' in Hebrew means son of a sage, or wise man. It's common - sort of like Schwartz in America." In 1959, there was a revolution in Morocco and "the French had to leave. My parents had divorced. My father went to France and I came here, to Forest Hills, with my mother." A Career At 16 Growing up in Morocco, despite anti-Semitism, "was wonderful. But coming to Queens from Morocco was like coming from the 16th century. I mean, I had never been on a bus, I'd never seen television. We didn't have a phone. I'd never been to a restaurant." "There, we had family meals with cousins and aunts, my grandmother, neighbors, that lasted forever. The contrast coming here was amazing, especially when you're a teenager and are interested in everything modern." Ms. Benzakin's career began when she was 16. "My mother needed help, so I had to go to work. I went to an employment agency, knowing nothing. I was a bit early, and had brought a doughnut and coffee with me. Well, I dropped the doughnut on the floor, brushed it off a bit, and ate it. Remember, I came from North Africa and was raised in a culture where if you throw out food you kiss it first, or you give it to the poor." Learning By Doing A man who happened to be passing by stopped to help her, and said, "I can't believe you're eating that." Ms. Benzakin said he "was moved by that. He had been in a concentration camp. He said, 'Not too many people would do that.' "Coincidentally, the man was looking for someone to work in his photo agency. "There were about 10 people looking for that job, all college graduates. But he called me the next day and offered me the job." Ms. Benzakin began working at the agency, and did her homework. "After about two years, a woman who handled the foreign department got sick, so I took over. I didn't know what I was doing. And I had no sense of money. In Morocco, I wasn't raised with money. We didn't have allowances or anything; there's nothing to buy after school, maybe a few pieces of candy. I didn't have the money consciousness we have here or in Europe." Two Photo Agencies People would call her to ask for photos "from, say, France. 'I have a 5:30 deadline,' they'd say. So I'd say, 'If you want it, it's $5,000.' I just picked that number so they wouldn't buy it. But they would! So the agency promoted me and sent me to Paris." Ms. Benzakin had become increasingly interested in taking photographs herself, and eventually became a correspondent in England for a French magazine, sold photos, and, when she was about 30, worked as a photographer and a picture editor at Time magazine. "There were very few women in photography then," she said. She was not a competitive photojournalist, though. "I'd go to parties and wouldn't photograph people who didn't want to be photographed, like Woody Allen. Everybody else would be all over them." She also started two photo agencies in France. Her accumulation of connections with "hundreds of photographers and dealers" in the photo world, here and abroad, has served her well in her career as a dealer. Respected Again "There's no one formula" to being a photo dealer, she said. "I deal directly with contemporary photographers, and also with estates and collectors." When Ms. Benzakin was starting out, "there weren't many collectors or many photo galleries. Once in a while there would be a big show, say at the Museum of Modern Art. Avedon or something. Even in Paris there were very few shows." There was a lot of action "during the time of Stieglitz and Steichen, and the Photo League," she said, "but then it died down. And now it's re-emerging, and has become really respected again, especially in the last 10 or 15 years." "A Different Level" "When I go to photo shows in New York there are people from small towns in the Midwest showing their work. All of these little places in America I've never heard of now have photo galleries. And look at all the museums that are showing photos now." Ms. Benzakin is a bit dubious about some uses of technology - altering photographs on the computer, for instance, as is sometimes done with newsmagazine covers. "It's something of a problem for me, perhaps because of my age. I realize the power of a computer program like Photoshop," which can be used to alter images, "but I haven't seen anybody who has taken photography to a different level with it, a different place, the way, say, Jimi Hendrix completely changed the guitar." "I haven't seen such a portfolio yet. But that doesn't mean I won't." Admires Mapplethorpe Ms. Benzakin was fortunate, she said, to have been able to rent the space for her gallery. Her landlord, Marty Trunzo, the barber who owns the building and whose shop is next door, picked her although there were "a lot of people on the list ahead of me. I think I was 15th, there were antiques dealers and so on ahead of me, so I didn't think I'd get it." "But he said, 'You'll bring culture to Sag Harbor. We have enough antiques shops already.' And he liked me because he'd been in World War II, and had been in Algeria then." Among the many photographers Ms. Benzakin admires are Robert Mapplethorpe, who "was important because of the way he opened up things both in photography and in society," although she finds his later work "too intellectual," and Minor White, whom she is particularly enthusiastic about these days. "So Much Gratitude" "It's the details. Minor White is on a different level. He never had the reputation other photographers had in those days, probably because he was gay. But I look at photographs in the gallery for weeks on a day-to-day basis, and he holds up. To me he's on the level of Ansel Adams and Edward Weston." "I was very fortunate in my life," Ms. Benzakin said. "I worked with people who had a passion for photography. They all had so much to offer me, and I have so much gratitude for that." Robert Long         http://zonezero.com/magazine/obituaries/benzakin/benzakin.html  
Sunday, 20 March 2005
436. Tsunami
Author:ZoneZero
    Zone Zero dedicates this space to the catastrophe occurred in Asia. It is intended to show the events through the vision of different photographers to give a real dimension of the tragedy to the people that live far from it.   We will also post advertisements of missing persons or people that are in health care institutuons of which no information is available. We invite you to send your messages of support and comments, which will be published as we get them.   Go to site    
Thursday, 17 March 2005
Author:Pedro Meyer
    We are reminded that “today the real has become the new avant-garde” by Nicholas Rombes.   The irony is that as digital technologies are used to deliver ever greater special effects and fantasies, there is an alternative tendency to use digital video cameras not to transform reality into some special effect, but rather to describe the world with increased realism.   In a sense as Mr Rombes points out, the new aesthetics - evident in recent movies shot with digital cameras, such as “Ten” (Abbas Kiarostami, 2002), "Tape” (Richard Linklater, 2001) and “Time Code” (Mike Figgis, 2000), “Russian Ark” (Aleksandr Sokurov, 2002) - rely on a species of strict formalism (the long take, the divided frame, etc) to remind us that reality is the most experimental form of all.   “Russian Ark” constitutes an elaborate continuous 96 minute long take through the Hermitage Museum [ only possible to achieve with digital cameras, since no film based camera could run for such a long period with out having to reload film]. “Time Code” is a series of four separate 97 minute long takes simultaneously shown in four quadrants. “Ten” is entirely shot (without the director present) from digital cameras mounted on the dashboard of a car as it is driven through the streets of Teheran. “Tape” take place en-tirely in one hotel room. In a sense, the special effect that the links these digital films to-gether is reality itself; they are considered experimental or avant-garde simply because they lack the jump-cut, speed ramp, freeze frame, CGI aesthetics that now form mass cultural media forms ranging form television commercials, to music videos, to video games, to television shows, to mainstream movies.”   When watching the Trilogy of the Lord of the Rings with my nine year old son, Julio, he leaned over to me and asked if all those people marching were real as we were looking at one of those scenes with thousands of marching warriors. Some twenty years ago we would have been amazed to learn that indeed they were special effects. Today we are amazed to learn if such a crowd is, in fact, real. It is reality that astounds us these days.   As I have been traveling around the world these past months, what has astounded me is how universal the trend has been to view the world through the eyes of what has be-come understood as digital technologies. But these understood for their special effects and not at all for the possibility to view the real, in new ways.   We live in an increasingly fictionalized world. On the one hand we have politicians of every stripe possible, all over the planet, delivering the most preposterous manipulation of reality with words and images ( they call them photo ops), and on the other hand we have the conglomerate of news media, from print to television, also on a world wide ba-sis, contributing in no small way to fictionalize reality to the extent that news events are sometimes so deliberately distorted or dramatized that one has a hard time figuring out what was real.   However just as in cinema, digital technologies are coming to the aid in bringing new forms to the medium, we find that in still photography something similar is starting to emerge.   Photographers who no longer have the need to cater to the demands by the news me-dia conglomerates and their dictates for what can and can not be presented to the pub-lic, are starting to find new venues to show their work. In that sense the internet has al-lowed many such filters to be lifted, thus we can deliver information as close to the facts as that might even be possible.   * * *     In keeping with reality, after more than a decade of not needing to ever go back into the darkroom to make a print, I decided to finally pack up all that darkroom equipment and place it storage for my great great grand children, so that one day they can look at those strange things with which we once used to make photographs with.   Although I am not nostalgic in the least, I must say that taking all those items and pack-ing them away was not so easy. After all many of those things were with me for dec-ades. Now, ask me if I regret getting rid of these objects, and I must say that not for a second. I am totally delighted to be able and move on and live in the digital age, for ever after. During this past decade, not once was I even tempted to step back into the dark-room. There is just too much fun to be had in the “light room”.   As I was putting all my darkroom objects in storage, I was also packing away all those envelopes of photographic paper. Among the names on these envelopes, Ilford ap-peared. In a peculiar twist of circumstances, this week also, Ilford was in the process of being bought out by it’s employees to see if it they can salvage the firm from financial ruin. Already Hasselblad went through a similar need to restructure itself, after going through a financial crisis of it’s own not too long ago. Polaroid was auctioned off some time back, and Kodak the once dominant name in photography, the world over, has a market value which is but a fraction of Apple, a firm that did not even exist in it’s days of glory. Now we get news that Leitz gmbh, the manufacturers of Leica cameras, is algo going under as their strategy to enter the digital market has proven to be one failure af-ter the next, and now the banks have cut their credit lines after Leitz lost half of it’s work-ing capital this past year.   In spite of all the mounting evidence that there is simply no way back and that analog photography is nothing more than just a period in the history of photograpy, and that we are only going in one new direction: which is digital. You will wonder, how it is possible that if you see all those stalwarts of analog photography come stumbling down, anyone would still doubt the direction of were photography is headed. Yet, believe it or not, that is what still is going on. I am sure the irony will not escape you, that those who disbelief the most what is happening, place themselves square in the midst of “ photographic re-alism”. It’ reality what astounds these days.   Pedro Meyer March, 2005 Coyoacan, Mexico City   As always please joins us with your comments in our forums. - THE FORUMS ARE UNDER RE-CONSTRUCTION, SOME OF THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS MAY BE MISSING -         http://zonezero.com/editorial/marzo05/march.html    
Tuesday, 01 March 2005
Author:Miguel Angel Ceballos
  When I was a kid, I was fascinated by the traveling photographers that went to far away towns to shoot portraits either on donkeys or on foot. They returned weeks later with the picture and got the rest of their pay. They were always welcome, except by my grandfather, who kept his distance, thinking they scammed money out of people. I can’t remember being photographed by any of them. I don’t have any pictures of my childhood. My oldest picture was shot when I was 16.   My name is Numo Rama and I am a photographer. I live in a poor neighborhood of Natal, capital of the state of Rio Grande do Norte, with my wife and my two children. Even though we are financially stable now, I don’t feel better off than everyone else here. What I have is the feeling of having great social responsibilities towards the rest of the community.   I come from an underprivileged background, I lived in a small provincial town. My father still lives of farming and raising live stock. My mother worked as a maid. I was five years old when they separated. A year later my father killed another farmer in a duel and had to run away, so our life became extremely difficult.   - The hard days-   I went to live with my mother’s parents, who dwelled in a rich man’s land. We were poor, but my grandparents were even poorer. My oldest brother and I went through very difficult times during our childhood. My other brother was adopted by my father’s parents and my youngest brother always lived with my mother’s parents. But we were strong and kept ourselves active. My grandmother hit me almost every day.   I loved going to the city to see the fair, this was the invention that made my life.   For example, electric light had kind of a spell over me. I would stare at a lamp in an uncle’s house in the city for hours. I made myself suffer electric shocks several times, they would make my hair stand on an end. My mother hit me when I took out the lamp to get another electric shock. In my imagination, light had a smell, but only those electric shocks would bring it out. Radiance, life, everything was contained in the light.   When I was 13, I went to live with my father and worked with him in the farm. My father slaughtered the livestock and my brother cleaned off the meat to sell it on the local market the next day.   (I am currently working on a project called “Meat Eaters”, which is a 100% autobiographical. The images are very disturbing and since I began I haven’t been able to eat meat.)   Three years later I went to look for new experiences in the North, I went to the state of Acre near the Bolivian border. Eight years later, I reunited with my mother in the outskirts of Brasilia, where she still lives. From that point on, my life changed pace dramatically. That place left deep marks on me. Since I couldn’t change the past, I decided to learn from it. I got good lessons out of it. That was my true school, and those are my real assets.   To be honest, I don’t even know if I am a real photographer. Everything started out in Portugal in 1991. I arrived there as an economic refugee, escaping from Fernando Collor de Melo’s government, which had shattered Brazil’s economy. But in 1994, photography crossed my path. My girlfriend, who is now my wife, gave me my first book about photographic techniques.   - Discovering the World -   AI started out to explore the universe of the photographic image. It was all so vast and far from my comprehension, that several times, I tried to do anything but photograph.   Everything became more clear when I read the biographies of the greatest photographers of the different epochs.   I was thrilled when I read about Manuel Alvarez Bravo and the Mexico of his time, about the immigrant Tina Modotti and the American Edward Weston. About the political uproar and the active participation of the artists, the extreme, genius mural painters. Mexico was in turmoil and artists played a major role.   When I came across the work of Pedro Meyer in Sweden, it was easy to understand him because he was Mexican. Later on I identified with his boldness. I really enjoyed looking at a Mexican re-invent his work in the digital age. With Meyer, I truly conquered more space and flew higher.   - The Quest -   After a long, long quest -since I never had a teacher- I understood what I was lacking. I perceived that all art forms and expressions are intertwined. The world in which these photographers dwelled was full of diverse arts. They were friends with great painters, literary geniuses, composers, revolutionaries, celebrities and many more. I didn’t fancy being friends with that kind of people, but at least I could work on my own appreciation of the arts to understand its creators and their message.   After that, it all became easier. I simply mixed my own experience with the human being --which I deem to be the best school of all- a bit of general culture, a camera and a great dissatisfaction with the oppression of the ruling classes over the majority that is in disadvantage in every aspect of the social landscape. These are the elements that drive my work.   When I think about photography , I don’t think about photo in newspapers –which has great importance and should be governed by ethics, like everything we do in life-, what interests me about it is not just the habit of documenting. I don’t photograph everyday or every week or every month. I just do it when I’ve got something to say, and that only happens after a long reflection. The images become a graphic interpretation of reality that I want to transmit.     I recently did a documentary about the life of the garbage workers. I think this was the hardest place to work. It took me four days just to shoot the first images. The Brazilians that worked there did not understand why I was taking photographs. It was very strange for them, because the photographers that had been there before shot from the distance with huge zoom lenses and left immediately.   I lived there for two months. I am a human just like them. Why couldn’t I be there?. Determination and a lot of respect were the key ingredients for the success of the project. I always think that if I cannot achieve to represent my subject-matter as I wish, at least I can walk away having made some good friends.   In the images I show our the inertia of our consciousness. The inert consciousness has a lot of guilt because it knows what is going on and how something could be done about it, but it’s not. On the other hand, the active consciousness looks to act and bring about specific changes. This can be found in every layer of society, but it is always a small minority.     - Pain as an Industry -   My photography is not a denounce. All of those that can acquire information know what is happening in the deprived places. Those people or other entities can bring about real changes in society. Indeed, the whole planet is like a huge favela (slum) on the outskirts of the galaxy with some lavish neighborhoods -represented by the rich countries. I do not make my living out of photography. The material that has been sold outside of Brazil has been re-invested in social deeds. My work is more social than photographic. I make my living in a jeep showing my country to foreign tourists.   The industry of pain has established itself with plenty of violence in systems and societies. We certainly must react somehow. This has been my reaction, we work with the children of the neighborhood and photography allowed us to buy a big piece of land where a school will be built. We are struggling to erect its first walls, but it will happen, I know it because we want it to happen.   (*) FAVELA. This is the name of a wild flower that is given to the slums in Brazil   You can send your comments about this interview made by Miguel Angel Ceballos to the following address: maceballosf@yahoo.com.mx           http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/ceballos/ceballos.html  
Thursday, 06 January 2005
Author:Sam Lubell
  It's a rite of passage for many expectant parents: baby's first ultrasound. The fuzzy images of the fetus, produced during an examination in an obstetrician's office, are prized by couples, passed around proudly among friends and relatives.   Now, trying to capitalize on this phenomenon, a number of companies are selling elective ultrasounds that have little to do with neonatal health. The services, often in small offices or shopping malls, amount to fetal photo studios and use newer 3-D ultrasound technology to produce more realistic images than conventional machines.   Parents-to-be typically pay from about $80 for a short ultrasound session primarily to determine the fetus's sex to $300 for a half-hour session that is recorded on a videocassette or DVD and includes color photos.   While medical professionals warn of potential health risks from unnecessary ultrasounds, those who offer the elective examinations say they are safe and fulfill a need.   Women love it," said Matt Evans, a lawyer, who started his company, Baby Insight, a few years ago. "They get to see their baby and have an emotional experience with their baby."   Mr. Evans said his technicians have performed more than 2,000 ultrasounds at the company's only location, in Potomac, Md. Baby Insight's highest-priced package, for $260, includes a video with background music, one 8-by-10, two 5-by-7, and 10 wallet-size color photos, four announcement cards and a chance for friends and family members to view the ultrasound images as they are produced on a large screen in the company's theater room.       Mr. Evans said his employees tell customers that the ultrasounds are not meant to be a substitute for a doctor's exam.   Shirlesa Glaspie, 24, of Lanham, Md., underwent an ultrasound at Baby Insight late last month, when she was about 30 weeks pregnant (at its Web site, the company recommends the procedure be performed between 28 and 32 weeks for the "cutest" results). Ms. Glaspie said the images, while a bit "scary," have made the experience much more real.   "He's yawning, he sticks his tongue out, he smiles," she said. "It gives you a realization of what's going on when your stomach is moving around and bouncing around."   While doctors typically conduct ultrasounds at 20 weeks (when the fetus is large enough to show abnormalities), nonmedical ultrasounds are generally performed later, when the fetus is more developed and more photogenic.   Proponents of elective ultrasounds say they can be performed at the customer's convenience in a relaxed atmosphere, and more frequently employ 3-D machines, which are not as useful for observing internal organs for diagnostic purposes but are excellent at capturing realistic still or video images of the face and body.   "As the technology improves, more and more women will be wanting to see it," said Mr. Evans, who has plans to open 75 more centers nationwide by the end of 2005. "That's why we're trying to get in while the market is still undeveloped."   He has plenty of competition. Other companies offering the services include Peek-a-Boo Ultrasounds in California; Womb With a View in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Texas; FetalFotos in Georgia; and Prenatal Peek, which has branches in North Carolina, South Carolina and California and is opening another in Hawaii, according to its Web site.     Many companies buy new or used medical equipment made by companies like General Electric, Siemens, Philips and Medison. Prices range from around $25,000 to more than $150,000.   Mr. Evans said he bought his used GE Voluson 730 from a national distributor, for $75,000. He would not name the company, in part, he acknowledged, because he feared that the Food and Drug Administration, which regulates medical equipment, might crack down on distributors.   Some doctors and federal regulators think ultrasounds performed outside the medical establishment may pose health risks. The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, a professional group, and the Food and Drug Administration have strongly opposed elective ultrasounds, saying that unnecessary exposure to high-frequency sound waves could be unhealthy.         "Although there are no confirmed biological effects for patients caused by exposures from present diagnostic ultrasound instruments, the possibility exists that such biological effects may be identified in the future," the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine said in a statement.   Dr. Lawrence Platt, former president of the group and a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California at Los Angeles, said elective ultrasounds could lead to mistaken diagnoses. "What if something is wrong with the baby?" Dr. Platt said. "Do these people know what to tell you?"   He said one of his patients came in thinking her baby was healthy after a nonmedical ultrasound. Other tests revealed a rare chromosomal condition that could have led to severe retardation and death. The woman ended her pregnancy. "There's no doubt that ultrasounds have been an incredible advance for science," he said. "We need to use the technology correctly. I hate to see this trend have a negative impact on the practice."   While the Food and Drug Administration regulates the equipment, licensing of health care providers is left to individual states. For the time being the companies do not need to be licensed, and the technicians do not need to be certified.   But Dr. Daniel G. Schultz, director of the agency's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said the agency was advising states about the potential health risks of elective ultrasounds and ensuring that machines were labeled for specific medical functions. "In the end it's up to the states," he said.   So would the F.D.A. never ban such practices? "I wouldn't say never," Dr. Schultz said. "It's a gray area where our authority ends and the states' begins."   The closest step to a ban has come in the form of a bill proposed in New York to ensure that ultrasounds only be performed after a referral or order by a "licensed health care professional." The bill is now with the Senate Rules Committee. California passed a legislation to make elective ultrasound customers sign a waiver acknowledging that they know the F.D.A. does not approve of the practice. The legislation will take effect shortly.   Mr. Evans, who asks patients to be in contact with their own doctors and hires technicians certified by the American Registry of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers, strongly disagrees with dire assessments of elective ultrasounds' health risks. There is no proof that ultrasounds are harmful, he said, and mentioned that doctors often perform numerous ultrasounds when investigating possible fetal health problems. "The F.D.A. has scared a lot of women, but from my experience women aren't worried," he said.   Marilyn Crisp, who opened a similar service, Womb's Window, in Wilmington, N.C., wondered whether the F.D.A. had been swayed by the persuasive voice of the medical community, which may fear that business is being taken away by independent operators.   Some doctors do not object to elective ultrasounds. Dr. Haig Yeni-Komshian, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Chevy Chase, Md., recently accompanied a patient to Baby Insight and found the practice safe, likening it to portrait work. "There's no radiation involved with ultrasounds, just high-frequency waves," Dr. Yeni-Komshian said. "As long as women are still seeing their doctors, if they want to have this done, that's fine."   But for now such companies will continue to operate under intense scrutiny from medical officials. Not that it matters to Ms. Glaspie, whose doctor told her the procedure presented no risk to her baby as long as she "didn't get one done every day." She purchased a video of the experience and has shared it with her son, her boyfriend, her parents, her brother, sister and grandmother, along with "anyone else who is interested."   "Every time we watch, it gets us more excited," she said.   © New York Times December 2004       http://zonezero.com/magazine/articles/lubellsam/index.html  
Wednesday, 29 December 2004
Author:ZoneZero
  Send pictures that depict the visual identity of your community, they could be murals, graffiti, advertisements, houses or business signs.   Go to exhibition      
Friday, 17 December 2004
Author:Pedro Meyer
    I don't know what the story is of this single fish, other than it seemed to be quite important to these men at the fish market in old Dhaka. Given that I do not speak Bangla, there was no way of finding out what the context was. This is of course the beauty and the limitation of photography, that it is open to any interpretation we wish an image to contain. So rather than speculate endlessly about the real meaning behind what we are looking at in this picture, I have decided to appropriate for myself it's meaning. It's about notions on the meaning of wealth. How rich is a man with one fish?     Bangladesh is according to economists, one of the poorest countries in the world. And of course the wages paid in the realm of one dollar a day, for breaking stones, or two dollars a day for pulling a Rickshaw all day long with a huge weight that many times is considerably larger than the individuals themselves, goes a considerable way in confirming that the announced levels of poverty in Bangladesh are no exaggeration.           However, statistics tend to also obscure other aspects of life that seem to get lost in such descriptions as "among the poorest in the world". I found that the people in Bangladesh are among the friendliest I have ever met any place, nothing to say that they must be the biggest enthusiast of having their picture taken that exists on the face of this earth.   I did not find a single instance of someone not wanting their picture taken, what's more, I had a hard time making any pictures as no sooner did I point my camera in any one direction that I would find myself surrounded by dozens of eager candidates to have their image become part of the intended photograph. To capture some degree of spontaneity I had to act really fast. That is, before the crowd moved in and wanted to join the picture.     I have of course no desire to romanticize poverty, nor to turn away from the reality of their hard existence. Yet it is also very narrow minded to just look at poverty in comparison to any western standard of living. How does one factor in to such evaluations, when you also find that the ability for people to get along with each other, that is considerably better than many of those in west? My little son, when he was in his first years in school, was taught what was called: Conflict Management. The kids had to learn what to do and how to resolve conflicts, which of course are part of our daily living. Those skills seemed to be something that needed to be taught in school. Here in Bangladesh, I have the impression that this is something they acquire in the water that they drink, or something of the sort, as their attitudes of dealing with conflict in a positive manner is something that is so widespread among the population that surely they did not get such skills in any school program.   Take a case in point, when there is a collision of rickshaws with other moving vehicles, the first topic they deal with is how can they fix the problem, not who is to blame. In almost all of the west, the first thing is establishing blame. Obviously in a society of the "have not", to resolve the problem at hand is more beneficial than to fix blame, as from the latter there is nothing much to be gained. In the west, the economic pursuit behind establishing who is at fault, is the more important matter. Probably the most efficient way of getting on with life is, how it is dealt with, in this very poor nation.   The issue of how people look at pictures takes on another twist when I heard a story by Shahidul Alam, the man responsible for Chobi Mela III, (Chobi= photo, and Mela= festival, in Bangla) and the reason I find myself here in Dhaka.   During an exhibition that was organized here. There was a work shop conducted some time ago, and the students work was displayed on the panels and presented to the community where the images were taken from. One of the girls in the audience, brought her goat to the exhibition, because she was pictured in one of the images, and she wanted to have the goat view the picture as well given that the goat was also in the picture. I doubt very much that in much of the west, the notion to bring a goat to a photographic exhibition to see it's image would be something that would occur to many of us. So there are indeed many things that one can learn in the context of an environment that has so many different ways of looking at photography.       This event here, is one of the largest of it's kind in Asia. Bringing photographers and their work to the forefront during the two weeks of this festival. I have met photographers from all over the region, and I am sure that as this festival grows over the coming years, Bangladesh will increasingly become a major center for the development of photography. And what better place to have such an event than a city, where to such a large extent, photography is welcomed by the population.   Here again, the often mentioned statement about poverty and digital technology being incompatible is brought to screeching halt. I was able to print an entire exhibition here in Dhaka, with Epson providing the printers and papers, and it all working perfectly well. Rather than shipping prints and frames all over the world and going through all the usual problems of customs and the inherent costs of shipping and crating, we were able to circumvent it all by printing the show on site, the frames were all made in 48 hours ( and what beautiful frames, on top of it all), the exhibition opened in time. Another exhibition, which was going to go up parallel to mine, and sent from the USA, never made it out of customs. If anyone has doubts how you could be dealing with international exhibitions with more options than in the past, we can provide you with some interesting feedback.   I have written many times in other editorials about safety and street photography, well here in Dhaka, as in any other large metropolitan conglomerates, there must be a number of "bad characters" as well, it's only that I have fortunately not run in to them, or that I do not attract them, either way, the thing is that I would never dare run around Mexico City, with the same degree of confidence that I found here.   I am not the only one with such a sensation of feeling comfortable walking around with cameras around your neck in old Dhaka, however there was one photographer from Malaysia who seemed to have run into trouble every time he went out. So the question is, does one attract such problems or run ins while photographing on the street? Are some photographers, trouble magnets by their behavior? I wonder, and if so, I suspect that dealing with cultural differences is one of those things that photographers the world over need to have included in school programs were photography is taught. I do not know of a single school anywhere, that teaches such important matters to photographers. It is assumed that we know how to deal with such matters, and the truth is that it is not.   As the year comes to a close, I am invaded by a degree of sadness, not only for all the great photographers that are no longer with us who died during this past year, but also about the political winds that seemed to have prevailed against all odds, at least so in the short run. Yet in spite of all of this, what keeps our spirits high is that that creators of art through out the entire world seem to be on the upswing. The intensity and dedication of artists throughout the world ( yes, I view photographers as artists and artists as photographers when they use photography) is thriving in spite of material limitations that appear to be part of the global landscape. It appears that having only one little fish is not such a terrible alternative when you know what to do and what to say. I get the feeling that there are more and more photographers who have this very clear.   We wish you the very best for the coming year of 2005.   Pedro Meyer December 17, 2004 Dhaka, Bangladesh   As always please joins us with your comments in our forums.             http://zonezero.com/editorial/diciembre04/december.html        
Friday, 17 December 2004
Author:Mariana Gruener
  iView media is a program for making catalogues that help you to organize an finde your files easily; it is designed for photographers, filmmakers or musicians that work with a lot of material.   iView media has the capacity of handling up to 8000 files per catalogue in its regular version. It is very easy to use, you just have to drag the folder or folders to a window that shows its contents, in which the images, files or audios appear either as a list, as icons or one at a time. The images can be seen up to a 2000% and the video or sound files start playing with a single click.             The catalogue keeps a link with the original files without the need of having it stored in the same place as them. By not working directly over the original file , but with a pre-visualization copy instead, the system allows to copy, move or delete images from this window without having to localize them within the hard drive. You can make audio-visuals, contact sheets, print either in low or high resolution, make back-ups in a different folder, CDs or DVDs. You can also write reports about the material.       One of its most interesting possibilities is the capacity to create web galleries without knowing HTML. Each image appears as an icon, that has a link to see it enlarged in another window.   One of the program’s qualities is that it allows to import directly from a digital camera, but has the disadvantage of not being capable to read NEF files, such as the ones generated by Nikon.   It can read the metadata attached to the digital camera files, and it allows to add on more information to facilitate file searching using specific terms by the author of the file or the file organizer.   The program only takes up a space of 3MB in the hard drive and can read, among other types of files, JPG, TIFF, Photoshop, bmp, flash , mp3, AIFF. Quick time movies, Windows’ AVI and DV files. But it cannot read NEF, raw, postscript and PDF files.     There are two versions of iView media, the regular and Pro. The Pro Version has the capacity pf managing 128, 000 images per catalogue and features many more functions, the capability of importing more types of files, make more sophisticated audiovisuals and web galleries with more options than the regular version. This version is intended for its use by production film companies, press agencies or newspapers not really for freelance photographers. However, a large individual photo archive might require such a powerful organizing, search, and presentation tool.   The program is featured in English, French and German, you just have to visit www.ivew-multimedia.com and buy it for US$49.00. You download it and the license is sent vie e-mail. The Pro version goes for US$199.00.   Let me tell you about an experience we had. In Pedro Meyer’s studio we had to edit thousands of images of the record he made in the 80’s of the presidential campaign of the Mexican ex-president Miguel de la Madrid.   I had to edit a sample of the project with no less than 300 images to show it to other editors.   I received the folders with hundreds of digitalized images, using iView media, I opened windows and quickly stored them in different folders by just clicking the mouse. I was able to select 300 photos out of 5000. I copied them to a specific folder in which I stored the catalogue, which could be shown as an audio visual and was uploaded to deliver it to another editor, without altering the original folders and images.   What would happen if I should receive a call by an editor or simply I wished to find one of my images at this very moment, but I had no idea where it is stored because I don’t have any kind of a catalogue that can help me to find it among the hundreds or thousands of images I capture every year? The photographer’s tasks also include filing and making back ups and catalogues. A picture that cannot be found is a like a picture that never was taken, and the time we spend looking for it also means that many images will not become a photograph.   Tools such as iView media allow to optimize the creative process of the photographers by helping them to organize a photo archive.   Mariana Gruener mgruener@yahoo.com         http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/ivewmedia/iview.html    
Thursday, 02 December 2004
443. Dog Days
Author:Leonardo Barreto
  Digital cameras are like dogs in the sense that they live seven years in one year. A good example is the Canon PowerShot G1. This puppy was born on September 18, 2000 with 3.1million pixels. In dog years, it would be 28 years old.   http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/timeline.asp?start=2000   This of course is only a rethorical way to quantify the tremendous speed in which digital photography is evolving.   Three million pixels… back in those days we thought “who wants so much and what for?” We must remember that in that same month the Kodak DC3200 was launched featuring a capacity of 0.9 million pixels (today’s cell-phone cameras have a better resolution).   Today we are in a mad pixel “arms-race” the 16.6 million pixels of the EOS-1Ds Mark II are the normal and necessary thing, the Nikon D2X "only" has 12.2 million, that is the limit of the self-proclaimed “world leader of photography”, but, could it be that they are just carefully assessing what is their target market?   The pressure for more pixels also comes from the point and shoot cameras, which have reached the 8 million pixel mark. This quantity of pixels only used to be found in digital back-ups, but is very important to point out that not all pixels are created in the same way. These are produced by smaller photo diodes than the ones in larger cameras, therefore producing images with noise, like the ones on a TV with no signal.   Again, all of this is happening at a tremendous speed –such as a dog’s life- for instance, Bronica just announced that it will stop producing its medium format cameras except for the Leica-type model 645.   For a while I owned a 6x6 Bronica with three Nikkor lenses, it was a nice Japanese camera, however it was known for breaking down often, and, yes, Nikon made 6x6 lenses.   Bronica took its name from the legendary Kodak Brownie, which could be bought in 1900 for 1 dollar and the advertising slogan said “Just shoot and Kodak will take care of the rest”.*   This is the official announcement from its parent company Tamron:   “Tamron USA , Inc. announced the worldwide discontinuation of Bronica SLR cameras and accessories as of October 31, 2004. ...* ..."Since the advent of digital photography, medium format sales have declined at a rapid pace. Imports today are just a fraction of what they were even two years ago,".... "For Bronica, that slip has been faster since our core customer base, portrait and wedding photographers, has adapted well to digital SLR equipment."... ...Repair service will continue for seven years as is mandated by law.     Mamiya announces ZD     Almost simultaneously, Mamiya one of the medium-format fat cats, has announced in Photokina a couple of digital backups and something that no one saw coming: the ZD.   The ZD is a beast never before seen in the digital world, but it can be argued that it will be quite comfortable in it. It is a body that will take all of the lenses of the 645Mamiya line which has 22 million pixels, and a sensor the size of almost a full frame (36x48 mm) and is similar in dimension to the EOS-1Ds Mark II.   Mamiya probably is thinking about using this baby not only to intimidate the makers of digital backups, which cost up to $ 30, 000 dollars (its is rumored that the ZD could cost a third of that), but also to the 1Ds Mark II, which was also announced in Photokina, featuring16.6 million pixels and a full-frame 35mm sensor.   There is no question that this will not be the end of the mega-pixel fever. At the forums of DPReview.com there is the -not very believable- rumor that the new generation of EOS could start off with a 2D of 22 or 21 million pixels.   http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=10296237   Hasselblad has announced its H1D, a camera more integrated to its backup, but unlike the ZD which is is in a single unit.   http://www.hasselblad.se/   The H1D would cost $19.995 dollars but, like an astronaut on a space walk, needs to be connected by a chord to a computer or an image bank hard drive. The backup plus the camera rises the price compared to the ZD, which runs on memory cards.   Fujifilm is producing the H1 line, a system of the 645 AF format that takes 120 film and digital backups for the Hasselblad brand. It is interesting to know that in Japan this camera bears the Fujifilm name, instead of Hasselblad.   It has to be said that Fujifilm does not own Hasselblad, it is a Korean corporation. The new CEO of Hasselblad was the founder of Imacon which was bought by that corporation to merge it with Hasselblad. So the former founder of Imacon -who originally made the Phase One backup- in a curious twist of fate, is now running the digital destiny of Hasselblad.   This makes us wonder if Nikon -who does not offer any models with more than 12 million pixels- has decided as a strategy to keep its distance with the medium format in the digital age, just as they did in the analog age.   The “ portrait and wedding photographers” as stated in the Tamron press release, “adapted well to digital SLR equipment..." In other words, the makers of 35mm SLR cameras have “stolen” the market away from the medium format cameras, getting to the point of putting Bronica out of business.   For instance, the Fujifilm Pro S2 became a very popular model amongst portrait and wedding photographers, and now that the S3 has come out, it promises no more pixels, but much more detail in shadows and lights, and better dynamic range by using twice the number of photo diodes, which is perfect for a single image of the white-dressed bride and the groom, dressed in black.   http://www.letsgodigital.org/es/news/articles/story_1107.html   Many professionals that cannot or do not wish to buy the digital backups, have opted for the Canon 1Ds, a camera that is capable of producing images comparable to 6x7 transparencies. We can see that Canon is clearly aiming its guns to the medium format field. There is also a very clear trend amongst professionals to replace the legendary F mount by the EOS.   The problem faced by Canon is that the sensors are half the size of the ones in the ZD, so even if they reach the 22 million-pixel mark, the photo diodes would have to be smaller and the image would be less clean.   There is yet another problem, which also is kind of a boundary for the 35mm format: Optics. No matter how good the quality of the Nikon and Canon lenses is, there are reasons to believe that lenses made to project a circle of image that is twice the size have better quality in the resolution of details..   This brings us back to the question of Nikon being aware of this boundary and wanting to keep itself to its turf, either they do not want or haven’t been able to “tackle” this share of the market. But it seems they are consolidating a kind of “sub-format” that even has got a name: The “DX”, which features a sensor 1,5 times smaller that a full-frame 35mm.   They have developed a line of wide angle DX lenses, which deliver an image circle with less coverage then 35mm lenses. Is it Nikon’s idea to wait for Mamiya to compete against the 1Ds? Divide and conquer? The problem is that Canon is also a very good competitor in all of the other sizes.   Anyway, the announcement of the ZD will probably take down the prices of the digital backups, the same goes for Canon, who will have to take competition into consideration when tagging the price for its EOS-D1 line. Other makers that ought to be working in integrating digital bodies for their lines of lenses are Hasselblad and Contax.   Why is there a race for more pixels?   On the one hand, consumers demand them We would simply say “I don’t need a Canon PowerShot G5 of of 5 million pixels if I’ve got the Canon PowerShot G1 of 3.1 million".   How many millions do you need? This depends on what you want to do, for some, a cell phone cam is enough, for others nothing short of 22 million pixels, 16 bits with a cooling system for the sensor is what is “necessary”. Of course each shot of these cameras is 42 megas in RAW.   This is just like the cars, if you ask about the mileage per gallon, that is not the vehicle for you.   The good news is that we will have the resolution that we deem necessary at prices we’ve never seen before. In March 1995 the Kodak DCS460 featuring 6.2 million pixels went for $12,000 dollars, nowadays a Samsung Digimax V6 is around $450 dollars, its weight is 6 ounces and also features 6 million pixels.   Leonardo Barreto xolotlan@prodigy.net.mx         http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/dogdays/dogdays.html  
Wednesday, 10 November 2004
Author:Pedro Meyer
    Several topics come together once again. On the one hand that old standing tradition of street photography and the question of what the limits are for “manipulating” an image and still consider it as photography.   I know, these are all hot buttons, which call into question so many of the old ways of looking and doing things. But we have to take risks as we move forward in this new age of photography.     First let me revisit the issues I brought up not too long ago about street photography.   Of course the issue of security for photographers has become more and more a problem in large metropolitan areas the world over. But then the other day I came across a small sign in a little photo store were they do the usual passport pictures, down the street from were I live. The sign read:   “Did you know that the world has as surface of 510,000,000 square kilometers?, Then why do you have to come to this little place and smoke here?"       We could apply the same notion to street photography, if the world is so large why do we need to take our cameras and photograph precisely in those areas that are actually very dangerous? Why not go to those spaces were you are welcome? I am sure everyone can understand the logic of this.   We have all heard horror stories about the dangers of street life in Brazil. Now coming from Mexico, I thought to myself that I would probably be able to cope with those issues in a recent trip I made there. But then there was also another issue, Brazil is the size of an entire continent, so to make those statements about street life for all of Brazil I thought was a bit of an exaggeration. And so it was. I did find that place were I was actually accepted.     I went in Brazil to photograph in the city of Trenedad in the state of Goias, and there no one bothered me in spite of carrying all my equipment around my neck in the midst of a crowd of nearly 300,000 thousand people during a religious procession. I was able to come and go at my pleasure with absolutely no major concerns, and that went on for the better part of ten hours. So it wasn’t a fluke.   The same thing happened to me the year before photographing in the streets of Madrid.   I am about to start a trip around the world. I will be going to Germany, Spain, Bangladesh, India, Thailand, Singapore and then the USA before coming back to Mexico City next January, I will be reporting back to you as the trip progresses as to what is going on with street life all over the world.       The other topic I was going to mention is something I already started to comment on in my previous editorial, and which relates to the manipulation or handling of the photographic image with new ways of moving the pixels around so as to give the image a combination of photorealism together with a more painterly look, both at the same time. I want to explore the visual impact that such a new form of photographic representation will actually offer the viewer.   It appears that there is plenty of room for a lot of very exciting explorations. At least it offers, to what would appear an old tradition, some new visual challenges to deal with.   Pedro Meyer November 2004   As always please joins us with your comments in our forums.     http://zonezero.com/editorial/noviembre04/november.html  
Monday, 01 November 2004
Author:The diaries -- Kos
    Thu Oct 28th, 2004 at 16:55:26 GMT Appropriately titled "Whatever It Takes", the new BC04 ad uses Bush's convention acceptance speech, stirring music, and images of dedicated troops and families in the heartland. As astutely noted by mikellanes.       http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/faketroops/fake.html    
Thursday, 28 October 2004
Author:Fredo Viola
  The Sad Song started out as an improvised melody and counter melody after I learned that my dog had cancer. The improv remained on my hard drive for nearly two years undeveloped.   In March my family found out that my father had cancer, and we spent the following month and a half by his side at the hospital, where he died. I had not been doing any music for probably a month after he died and I had really buried my emotions. When I returned to my studio I decided to finish the track. It was amazing, the melody acted like those floatation devices used to bring heavy sunken objects up from the bottom of the ocean, and up came my emotions.   Go to exhibition    
Tuesday, 19 October 2004
Author:Pedro Meyer
    One can observe how in recent years, a growing number of those who have used photographs in their work have started to shy away from describing themselves as photographers. They are now “artists”. As if photographers belonged to a different species than those of artists.   Well to a degree they do, by what one can glean from the market, it seems that if you consider yourself an artist, the same work can fetch considerably higher prices than if you are simply a photographer.   So I don’t know if to congratulate such colleagues for their practical approach, or to question their opportunism for being willing to dance to the tune of what ever the taskmaster demands.     But aside any issues that might come across as moralistic in nature. In this market oriented environment, there seems to be something most everyone is missing out on. Let us take a closer look.   Photography is not what it used to be. A lot of people have tried to invent new words for the work that has been coming out in this digital age, apparently we needed to coin new terms to describe the work because photography was no longer an appropriate term.   Not only has there been an exodus of photographers to the land of the “artists”, but on top of it, everyone is attempting to find new terms to describe the images produced in this age of computers.   There clearly is a profound dissatisfaction with what is, after all names just describe what is going on. It appears that any approval and major recognition is really bestowed on the artist and not the photographer, obviously economic pay follows. And if you can slap the label of NEW onto something, it will probably also create more interest, that is what the market tells us.   Maybe this can help us understand the increased distancing from the term photographer and photography, which apparently has become associated with old fashioned and outmoded ideas.   However, I find they got it all wrong and we should make every effort, especially at this point in the brief history of photography to size the opportunity to actually expand the horizons of photography not abandon it, and not loose site of were we can move forward to on our own terms.   Allow me to explain. I find that photography is at the threshold of its greatest creative moment and the best times are yet to come. However, the nature of what we understood as photography in the analog age has to be reconsidered. Yes, photography it is still all that it was, but then it’s also a lot more as well.       The word photography, as we all know, means “writing with light”. Well, never in my life time, have I ever had a more direct experience of actually writing with light, as I have in recent years, when taking a stylus pen, and actually being in a position to move around, at my will, all those pixels that were captured through my digital camera or scanned from film.   To sit there in front of my computer screen, and to manipulate those pixels, has been the most direct experience I have ever had with the notion of what photography was always intended to be, at least from the stand point of those who made up the word to describe the process called photography.   I can explore and submerge myself today to the very bottom of a sea of pixels, and touch each individual pixel through the pressure of my finger on a stylus, with no parallel to what could be done previously to the individual grains in a sea of gelatin with silver halides. This basic premise transforms all of photography forever.   With such a new set of rules, the limits of photography are basically our imagination. So the question comes down to the following: we can either expand our understanding of what photography is in order to broaden the field, thus making it a stronger and more influential player called PHOTOGRAPHY, or to let things stand as they are and to just watch as it all slowly erodes with everyone calling the photograph by another name, and no one really wanting to be identified with being a photographer any longer.   We either reinvent photography, by broadening what is understood as a photograph, or we will probably end up not having much of photography to defend, as it will be called something else by everyone.   I for one, find that the more I alter my images, the more photographic they become, but then I am also thinking along the lines of looking at photography differently. I am also convinced that as soon as we view photography with a wider perspective, the “market” will understand that there aren’t so many dilemmas in this matter between being a photographer or an artist.   The strictest of documentary photographers, will probably discover to their great surprise, that there is as was before, room for a lot of such work under the term photography, much as the journalists has no problem using words to describe his or her ideas, we have poets using words as well. Why should the “photograph” be considered any different than the “word”? In either instance every one understands the context.     But having said that, we also call the poet a poet and not a journalist, and that is why probably the slow migration of photographers towards the self definition of artists helps us understand that such separations indeed define different working strategies that are distinctive and should not be confused and mixed up. But we should all still be able to call a photograph a photograph. After all, paraphrasing Gertrude Stein, “ A photograph, is a photograph, is a photograph”.     Pedro Meyer October 2004 Coyoacan, Mexico       As always please joins us with your comments in our forums         http://zonezero.com/editorial/octubre04/october.html      
Friday, 01 October 2004
Author:Jorge V. Gavilondo
  Date: September 15, 2004 3:22:55 PM CDT To: ZoneZero News   Estimados amigos de ZoneZero:   Los invito por esta vía a que revisen mi recién inaugurado sitio web (http://jgimage.smugmug.com)...les agradezco cualquier comentario... Soy un ferviente lector de los editoriales de Pedro y admirador de su fotografía... considero ZoneZero un foro importantísimo y de vanguardia en la orientación de los fotógrafos y particularmente los latinoamericanos, hacia una interpretación "revolucionaria" de las técnicas digitales en fotografía, y una visión más completa de toda esta actividad humana... a ello estoy dedicando parte de mis energías con mis colegas coterráneos...   Un saludo, Jorge V. Gavilondo La Habana, Cuba  
Wednesday, 15 September 2004
Author:Pedro Meyer
  We were about to land in Mexico City; I had my digital camera pointing out the window when over the loudspeakers a pre-recorded voice stated, “All electronic devices must now be turned off….” Which of course I thought did not actually include my camera. However, as the stewardess paced the corridor inspecting if all the passengers were following the orders just spoken from above, she let me know that they understood “all electronic devices” as including any digital cameras.   By some misguided notion of bureaucratic expertise someone came to the conclusion that the pixels landing on a memory chip inside a camera could actually derail the communications gear on an airplane about to land. Well, they don’t.   As soon as the stewardess walked past me to buckle herself down in her own seat, I took out my little Sony T1 digital camera to take some more aerial images, I knew there was no chance that my camera interfered with the communications of the plane, any more than the digital watch did, on the wrist of the passenger sitting next to me.   We are constantly faced with issues of perception, or shall I say miss-perceptions in these tumultuous and complex times when so many fundamental notions of what we believe to be “true” are never really questioned and just taken as articles of faith.       Deepak Chopra, in his audio book, New Physics of Healing, tells us about the Quantum mechanical body, in order to comprehend what it really is and how the latest advances in science determine a new way of perceiving even ourselves. He begins by exploring issues of perception and how these have determined and influenced how we treat nothing less than our own bodies. Upon facing for the first time the notions that Dr. Chopra explained in great detail, I was fascinated at the uncanny similarity to all the those concerns that photographers have been expressing with respect to digital photography and matters of representation.       He explained how the mechanics of perception are frozen in an old worldview that should have gone away with Newtonian Physics. How does perception gets structured in our physiology? He asks. And goes on to explain how commitments are structured into our body mind by conditioned circumstances.       In India for example, a baby elephant is tied with a flimsy rope to a green twig for a few weeks after it is born, but then when the animal grows up to become a full grown huge animal, if he were to be tied with an iron chain to a tree he could snap the iron chain with one movement or better yet even walk away with the entire tree. However, if the elephant is tied with a flimsy rope to a green twig it won’t be able to escape, it has made a commitment in his body mind that this is a prison and therefore will not escape as long as that flimsy rope is tied to his foot.   At Harvard Medical School there was an experiment made some 20 years ago that ultimately led to a Nobel Prize in Physiology (1). A group of kittens were brought up in an environment that had only horizontal stripes, and another group that only had vertical stripes. And when those kittens grew up to become “wise old cats”, as Deepak Chopra, amusingly called them, one group of cats could not see anything other than a horizontal world and the other group could not see anything else but a vertical world. They lost the sensory apparatus to see either horizontal or vertical stimuli. The visual sensors they had been brought up with now determined their world.       There are a great number of experiments with all of the data on the mechanics of perception now pointing to one crucial fact leading to the same conclusions; our sensory apparatus and our inter neuronal connections develop as result of our initial sensory experiences and how we are taught to interpret them, and subsequently we function with a nervous system that has only one reason for it’s existence, to reinforce what we were exposed to and was interpreted for us in the first place.   There is a technical term for this used by psychologist, its “premature cognitive commitment”, we commit ourselves to a certain cognitive reality, a preconceived conceptual boundary, literally our nervous system serves to keep reinforcing the conceptual boundaries that we have structured in our own consciousness.   The picture of the world turns out not to be the look of it at all, it’s just our way of looking at it, very literally, the shape, color or texture of things are the function of our receptors that have been programmed to be seen in a certain way.   The eye cells of a bee, for instance, when it looks at a flower it doesn’t see the same colors that you and I see, because they do not have the receptor to see them. However, from a distance a bee can sense ultraviolet and thus the honey in a flower, yet it cannot see the flower at all.   A bat would see such a flower as the echo of ultrasound, a snake would sense that flower as infrared radiation, a chameleon’s eyes balls would see on two different axis something that we can’t even remotely imagine.   So then, what does the real world look like? Asks Deepak Chopra, What is the real texture of it? What is the real shape? And the answer he gives, is, there isn’t such as thing. There are only an infinite number of possibilities, all coexisting at the same time. Yet we freeze such fields of infinite possibilities into a certain perceptual reality, literally as a result of our cognition derived from our “premature cognitive commitments”.   Sir John Carew Eccles (2), who also won the Nobel Prize amongst other things for elucidating the mechanics of perception stated: “ There are no colors in the real world, no smells, no textures, no sense, nothing of the sort, they are all structured in our awareness, they are all assembled in our awareness”.   There is definitely a shift in the world of technology today, leading to the overthrow of a superstition that existed in science for a long time. That superstition is materialism. That the world out there is made out of objects that are separated from each other, and which can be separated from each other in space and time. Our entire system of logic is embedded in this system of materialism, which makes sensory perception the crucial test of reality.       Yet all our technology today is built on the Quantum mechanical perspective. Today anything that we do, such as using the telephone, or watching TV, or using a computer or traveling on a jet plane from here to there, or sending a missile into outer space, all of these are based, not on the idea of the atom as a solid entity but on the idea of the atom as a void of energy. So even though these transformations have taken place, the superstition still remains in place with respect to materialism.   If this then is not really what this is in reality, then what is it? Everything that you really see is made out of atoms, these atoms are made out of particles, that are moving at lightening speed around huge empty spaces, and those particles themselves are not material objects but fluctuations of energy. If you could see the human body with the eyes of a physicist as it really is and not through the artifact of sensory perception, because that is what has been happening, we would come to the conclusion that we are into some major transformation in our perception of reality.   Obviously the words spoken by Deepak Chopra struck a chord in me, with regard to photographic representations. More so then, when by one of those coincidences in life, I had the pleasant surprise of a visit to my studio of a friend who wanted me to meet someone who was doing some very interesting work that he felt I should see.   Oscar Guzmán, who has been working over the past two decades in 3D environments, showed me his work, that unwittingly, connected me directly with the theme of multiple receptors commented upon by Dr. Chopra, only this time from the perspective of photography. Our potential to view the world in so many different ways became immediately apparent. The metaphor of the various forms of receptors by the bee, the bat, the snake and the chameleon, became all too eloquent.   Oscar, pulled out his camera and took a portrait of me sitting at my desk in my studio, and then stitched those same images into so many different polar combinations, none of which in fact related to the optical representation that for centuries had been the sole method of photographic points of view. Thus giving visual forms to the words spoken by Deepak Chopra: “What is the real shape in the world? And the answer is, there isn’t such as thing. There are only an infinite number of possibilities, all coexisting at the same time.”   I could perfectly well imagine myself traveling in that space made out of the void rather than atoms, that Dr. Chopra mentioned, as moving through those clouds as the plane was about to land, was a very magical representation of space and time, with that fluctuating energy all around me.   Pedro Meyer September 6, 2004 Coyoacan Mexico     Please also read Oscar Guzman on “Visual Cartography” In the magazine section at ZoneZero. http://zonezero.com/magazine/articles/cartografia/cartography.html         1. Nobel Prize was awarded in 1981 to David H. Hubel (*1926 in Canada) USA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and Torsten N. Wiesel (*1924) Sweden, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,"for their discoveries concerning information processing in the visual system". (back) http://www1.science.ca/scientists/scientistprofile.php?pID=175   2. Nobel Prize was awarded in 1963; The prize was awarded jointly to: Sir John Carew Eccles (*1903) Australia, Australian National University, Canberra; Sir Alan Lloyd Hodgkin (*1914) Great Britain, Cambridge University, Cambridge; and Sir Andrew Fielding Huxley (*1917) Great Britain, London University "for their discoveries concerning the ionic mechanisms involved in excitation and inhibition in the peripheral and central portions of the nerve cell membrane". (back)     As always please joins us with your comments in our forums.       http://zonezero.com/editorial/septiembre04/september.html      
Monday, 06 September 2004
Author:Juan Carlos Alonso Rico
  Date: August 26, 2004 5:10:33 PM CDT   Señores ZoneZero   Soy artista y fotógrafo colombiano. Actualmente resido y estudio en Barcelona.   Me gusta mucho su página. Desde hace un tiempo he estado buscando una página con información y trabajos sobre fotografía artística y experimental. La propuesta de la página como encuentro de fotógrafos, información, foros, etc. me parece muy bien organizado y claro; y me parece exelente que se de un énfasis muy grande a la producción latinoamericana.   Por otro lado me parece excelente que se haya incluído el trabajo "Photograph to Remember" via on-line, ya que desde hace mucho tiempo intentaba verlo.   Quisiera registrarme para recibir noticias del site.   Muchas Gracias y Felicitaciones Juan Carlos Alonso Rico  
Thursday, 26 August 2004

<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>Page 18 of 54


Share This
|
More