Galleries

Results 851 - 875 of 1334

<< Start < Prev 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Next > End >>

Author:Peewee Morato
  Date: Sun, May 9, 1999, 9:16 AM   speaking of images, the stark image that was formed in my mind when i read your article "photography and its trails out of kosovo" was no other than the halocaust. the plight of the jews, first through persecution which then escalated into their almost complete annihilation, left a mark on me. the feeling is indignation!!! this feeling comes from narrative accounts and from still photographs and from motion pictures depicting the terrible, terrible saga of a people singled out for death. reading through however gave me hope, because the thoughtful images i derived from reading your account, i could voice out and express through the internet. i live in the philippines and an uncle from australia sent me your article which moved me to forward it to my personal quick list. it is my way of not looking the other way amidts the terrible, terrible suffering of a people... a whole race... while others sat by doing nothing, or perhaps were completely oblivious to it. at least, let us all be aware.i am afraid this is happening all over again in kosovo. the internet somehow diminishes my feelings of powerlessness over circumstances that seem beyond me,living so far away. the trail of photographs left by some of the refugees to mark the path for an escape route for their loved ones left me with the image of "hanzel and Gretel", ofcourse. i'm sure this is the fairy-tale which could have inspired the desperate wife wanting to guide her husband to safety. fortunately, birds don't happen to eat paper, and so the refugees reached the albanian frontier merely following the paper trail.  
Sunday, 09 May 1999
Author:Melanie Einzig
  Date: Sun, May 9, 1999, 8:16 AM   Hello Pedro! Thank you for the link to the web page in Yugoslavia. This attack is so disturbing and confusing. Today's bombing of the Chinese embassy that we're being told is accidental is so upsetting. Zonezero is looking great. A real democratic exchange of ideas which I am terribly hungry for at this time. My work is changing. I broke free from AP for now and exploring other was to distribute pictures and make money to survive. I feel more free than when we first met by e-mail and I had to run away to Florida! Many art projects differen directions. By the way, what do you think of Fullbright "exchange" programs?I just read an article that wrote about the use of programs in Mexico to expand on NAFTA's original goals of american business expansion. Do you ever visit NYC?   Hope all is well--Melanie Einzig  
Sunday, 09 May 1999
Author:Frank Blocker Jr.
  Date: Sun, May 9, 1999, 9:50 PM   Dear Sir, Your site is well laid out. I particularly like the calibration feature. Thanks for the site. Sincerely, Frank Blocker, Jr.  
Sunday, 09 May 1999
Author:Shahidul Alam
  Third World activists are using global connections to pressure the powers that-be and even save lives. Bangladeshi photographer Shahidul Alam has little doubt about the subversive potential of the Internet in his country.       'Come out, we won't shoot.' The sound of a police megaphone jolted us to attention.After they left our flat in Dhaka I went up to the roof to try and find the person they thought we were hiding. I found no-one, but the raid made us realize that the nine-year-old dictatorship of General Ershad was feeling the pressure.   Running Drik, a photo library set up to promote a more positive view of developing countries, we were already in the business of disseminating information. Up to this point we had managed quietly to distribute our photographs abroad through helpful friends. Now the need was more urgent: we had to prevent further bloodshed. We couldn't phone or fax since none of us had an overseas line. Two days later in December 1990, when General Ershad did finally step down, we began collecting the money for the line.   The need came quickly. The new government elected a few months later turned out to be less than democratic after all. So in 1994 we decided finally to take the leap into high-tech communications. We linked up with TOOL, an overseas NGO, and set up our won electronic mail network, called DrikTAP. There was no way we could afford faxes, let alone telephone calls and mail was much too slow. Now with an ordinary telephone line we could send messages overseas cheaply.   We soon discovered that others were keen to join into e-mail too, so we began to offer it as a service to local NGOs and activists. UNICEF and the Grameen Bank were amongst the first to join. Grameen was in the business of giving loans to the poor and had a wide rural base. UNICEF had field offices all over the country. They used the network to link up all their offices country-wide. Then Drik began to send photographs via e-mail. Something that could only be done earlier by big Western agencies like AP, AFP and Reuters.   Now our little network was beginning to connect to other like-minded groups and Drik was becoming known as an organization out to change the way the poorer countries were perceived. Our 'bulletin boards' were useful for everyday things like renting a flat or locating an expert but crucial when we needed to stay in touch in times of danger.     Two months later the Bangladeshi feminist writer Taslima Nasreen received a death threat from Islamic fundamentalists and was charged with blasphemy by the Government. We needed to move quickly - to create national and international pressure so Taslima could come out of hiding to alert PEN (the international writers support group) and Amnesty International and the campaign took off. Our fragile network was working. Later one of our members showed us how to use traditional 'search engines' to locate human-rights groups and Bangladeshi 'news groups' overseas (Bangladesh.Soc.Culture is a good one). We knew things were going to get rougher politically and we needed a way of getting information out fast and cheap. If some of us got arrested, others could mobilize enough pressure to stop us simply 'disappearing'.   Our network became more popular by the month. Major NGOs, universities, research groups, UN agencies, even government organizations and embassies all joined. Conferences on a wide range of subjects sprang up: music, child rights, job applications, even buy and sell. We had begun talking to each other and to learn to be comfortable with the medium. We started to use Bangla (albeit in Roman script) so we could at least speak our own language. Overseas friends were posting our human rights messages in the popular Bangladesh news groups. When police raided the university to arrest student leaders the news was round the world in hours. Letters to the Prime Minister poured in from all over giving us some breathing space and sparing some lives.   Realizing how fragile our link was (a single telephone line connected up all our users, local and overseas) we campaigned for treating e-mail providers as special clients requiring quality lines. Though we were the leading e-mail provider in Bangladesh, DrikTAP was not fully legal - we had no 'official' government permission. On the other hand we were surprised that despite the amount of critical information we were pumping out over the network we had not faced any direct censorship. There had been doubts when one Drik worker was attacked and wounded and again when our telephone line had been cut for a week. But on the whole we were getting away with it. I suppose shutting down the largest and most popular e-mail network in the country was something even the Government was reluctant to do, particularly with an election looming.   Gradually we began to find other uses for the technology. We set up training programs and eventually an e-mail club where we would meet and discuss problems. We would share the responsibilities of the network and decide collectively on future plans. It was a strange mix. The computer whiz kids and the computer illiterate, both came. Those comfortable with the technology took turns training newcomers. Political activists took on the role of lobbying for extra telephone lines and Internet access.   When Drik could no longer cope with the demand for technical support many of our more experienced members volunteered to help out answering queries. Some set up a system so users outside the capital could access the network using local calls. We began to work more as a family and the network took on a more human shape. We put up a notice for help from a local school that was struggling and a doctor offered his services. Others provided teaching aids, some gave money.   However, e-mail is still very expensive for most Bangladeshis - even local elites. A computer costs as much as half a year's average salary and a modem costs more than a cow, never mind the price of a telephone line. So we began performing like an electronic post office. People come in with a floppy disk; we send their e-mail and they come back later to collect their reply. And not everyone who uses the service is an activist.     Our oldest user, Golam Kasem, had just turned 103 and had never seen a computer before. I would cycle over to his house in Indira Road with a printout of a message from his grandson in Canada and next day peddle up to collect his reply. I remember the frail old man, straightening up the computer printout and adjusting his thick glasses as he held the paper by his tungsten lamp.   There are some areas though where we totally failed. Our 'bulletin boards' were entirely dominated by men and many of the jokes were sexist. Some even racist. When a woman user objected to a sexist statement the men retaliated viciously. A few loud voices dominated the bulletin boards. The technology was new to many people. Often private mail would get posted accidentally on a bulletin board, sometimes with embarrassing consequences - making the system scary for novices.   On the whole however, DrikTAP has become a powerful way of talking to the outside world. And, more importantly, to each other. When our 'node' in Bangladesh grew bigger than the one in the head office of our Northern partner in Amsterdam we argued, for political reasons, that the head office should be in the developing world. Last July we proposed relocating the head office of our global network in Bangladesh. In a small way we were witnessing a shift in the balance of power. Shahidul Alam lives and works in Dhaka, Bangladesh and can be reached at Drik Picture Library Ltd. shahidul@drik.net Voice: 880-2-81295 / Fax: 880-2-911504 /     http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/shahidulinternet/shahidullifeline.html    
Sunday, 09 May 1999
Author:Norberto Romero Z.
  Date: Sat, May 8, 1999, 10:30 AM   Pedro: Mi nombre es Norberto y soy un estudiante mexicano de fotografía en la Universidad de Westminster en Londres (antes "The Polythecnic of Central London"), y solo quiero felicitarte por el estupendo trabajo que estan realizando en ZoneZero, una de mis páginas preferidas y que tiene muy buena crítica entre algunos de mis profesores.   Considero que el cuestionamiento que se esta dando en tu revista, acerca de los efectos que tiene la revolución tecnológica sobre la manera en que vemos y apreciamos la imagen, es muy importante y no muy común, por lo que le suma mérito.   Hasta pronto, Norberto Romero Z.  
Saturday, 08 May 1999
Author:Max Kozloff
  To Readers (with an interest in the Humanities): From: Max Kozloff, New York   The following is a section from a "disappeared" book. "Disappeared", in this case, refers to a book that had come out but was shortly afterward disavowed and withdrawn by its publisher, who dropped the title from the catalogue and took no orders from booksellers.   Here are the facts: the book in question is my Lone Visions/ Crowded Frames, originally published by the University of New Mexico Press in late 1994. It is a collection of previously published essays on photography. In April, 1995, an attorney for Richard Avedon, a photographer, demanded money damages from [non-existent] profits and that the UNM Press "immediately cease and desist...publication" of the book because it included 3 of his copyrighted pictures (to illustrate a negative essay) without his permission. This was followed by a threat to seek an injunction in the courts to have the book withdrawn. My lawyer represented that Avedon had no case because I was entitled to "fair use" of said images (press glossies).   Fifteen months later, I have heard nothing further from Richard Avedon. BUT, without telling me, the University of New Mexico Press's lawyer, fearing a lawsuit, ordered the book's withdrawal. The First Amendment had no cachet in these quarters. Upon learning of his action, only in January, 1996, I demanded that the book be put back on the market. At long last, the publisher has agreed to do this, but not officially, (with full protocol) until Spring, 1997, two and a half years after it had originally been brought out.   I offer you the essay on Richard Avedon, with hopes that it may give pleasure and knowledge. Should you wish to have the whole book, which includes sections on portraiture, street photography, and photojournalism, it may now be ordered, I am informed--through your book dealer or the publisher directly:   The University of New Mexico Press, 1720 Lomas Blvd, NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131. Phone: 505 277 2346 At present, it is a rare item. I recommend the paperback edition, price $24.95. Thank you for your attention. Max Kozloff   To contact Max Kozloff: fax 1 - 212 - 228 - 8995 Avedon's pictures are reproduced from the aforementioned book in strict compliance with "fair use" within a review.       http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/kosloff/default.html      
Saturday, 08 May 1999
Author:John Derry
  I recently spoke with Pedro Meyer. We talked about the tools we make at Fractal and how people use them. Pedro expressed an interest in the design process that goes along with creating expressive tools like Painter. What follows are some of my thoughts on the tool-making process. I'll start with a bit of personal background.   My own schooling is in the traditional arts. I have both BFA and MFA degrees in drawing and painting, as well as a period of living as a "struggling artist" under my belt. This provides me with a strong grounding in traditional expressive media. I was heavily influenced by the Abstract Expressionist school, especially the work of Robert Rauchenberg and Jasper Johns. Both artists intermixed graphic imagery and expressionistic painting. As in their work, I employed a variety of techniques to incorporate existing images with my painting and drawing.     My first direct encounter with computer-generated imagery occurred in 1982. I had the opportunity to do some freelance work for the local cable television operator creating "frames" of graphics for an experimental interactive channel. The idea was that you could shop, do banking, play games, etc. through your cable hook-up. To create the graphics, I had to work with special grid paper and a fixed set of colors.   For example, I'd be given a number of visual ideas to be used for clues that were part of a children's spelling game. I'd use the grid paper and color combinations to create a mosaic-like image of an apple tree. This frame would appear at the appropriate moment in the sequence of clues to help the player spell the word "apple". After designing a number of these images, I would turn the sheets in to the computer operator who would, in turn, keyboard the grid squares sequentially into the computer. The result would be a crude "mosaic" of the image on the monitor.   I'll never forget the first time I saw one of my designs glowing on the monitor screen. Some basic thing was forever changed in the way I thought about making images. This was something new and amazing. It was the birth of a medium!   As fascinating as it was, however, the method of creating the images was very foreign to someone with a background in painting and drawing. I spent a couple of years working for the Nebraska Arts Council as an artist-in-residence. This provided me with the opportunity to educate myself about computer graphics. I attended conferences like SIGGRAPH and took a few programming courses. I quickly determined my talents were not in writing code.   I also became acquainted with small software company in Santa Rosa, California. The company was Time Arts and had a product named Lumena. Lumena was one of the first PC-based paint systems. It featured a toolset that included pens and brushes. It was also based around the use of a digitizing tablet as an input device. This immediately appealed to me because of the familiarity of the tools and the stylus-based mark-making instrument. It also supported 256 colors, which in 1984 was rare for a personal computer.   One thing led to another, and I found myself moving to Santa Rosa to work for Time Arts as a demo artist. Once there, I quickly gravitated to the programmers. These were the people who crafted the code that comprised Lumena. I was fascinated by what inspired them to come up with the tools in the first place. They, in turn, were fascinated by my art background and talent. What amazed me was that they would lovingly craft a mark-making tool and then have little interest in using it. They quickly discovered that they could have me play with the tools and provide them with feedback as to how to improve it.   My rudimentary knowledge of programming provided me with enough understanding to be able to communicate with the programmers in their jargon. It was as if I was present while a blacksmith formed a piece of red hot iron on the anvil with a hammer. I had the opportunity to suggest certain bends and shapes while the iron was malleable. Once the metal was cooled down, I could look at it and see my contribution in the final form. I had been transformed from a tool user into a tool maker. I would never again be satisfied with just being a tool user.   During my tenure at Time Arts I became proficient at tool and interface design. I was able to fully exercise my skills on the design of a Macintosh-based paint application called Oasis. Oasis introduced the Macintosh world to the pressure-sensitive tablet. Time Arts had embraced CAD-based digitizing tablets very early and had kept pace of tablet developments as they occurred. We had created many tools in Lumena that used pressure in different ways. I was always advocating various ways of using pressure sensitive tablets to simulate traditional media. Oasis provided us with the opportunity to start from scratch and evolve our tools and interface to the next level. Oasis received a lot of attention but ultimately failed in the marketplace due to Time Arts' inability to muster the resources required to sell and market shrink-wrap retail software. The other reason was another piece of software that showed up around the same time...Painter.   The very first time I saw an early beta version of Painter, I immediately knew that Time Arts heyday as the leader in creative mark-making tools was over. It didn't take long before I made a beeline for Fractal. I immediately hit it off well with Mark Zimmer and Tom Hedges, the engineering talent behind Painter (and ImageStudio and ColorStudio previously). In particular, Mark had a passion for creating tools that simulated traditional media. We discovered in each other a perfect complement to each of our skill sets.   Now that I've provided you with a snapshot of how I became a tool maker, I'd like to step back and describe some of the guiding principles we have developed at Fractal that we use to keep us aimed at our initial vision.   One of the phrases we use to describe what we do at Fractal is "capturing the human gesture for the purpose of creative personal expression". In its broadest sense, this is what Painter does. Our approach to crafting creative software is parallel to crafting musical instruments. We create instruments of expression. Natural media software is the graphic equivalent of synthesizers that mimic traditional musical instruments. Along with this lies a deep respect for the traditions and techniques of creative mark-making tools. The way in which man makes marks to express himself has evolved over a great deal of time.   With the advent of the computer, many of the early techniques for digital drawing and painting were tailored to suit the strengths of the computer and its interface. The mouse is a good example. As a pointing device used in the service of navigating graphical interfaces the mouse is great. But when used as a expressive drawing instrument, it leaves a lot to be desired. I have often said that drawing with a mouse is like drawing with a bar of soap. The shape of the mouse does not provide the feel of a stylus in the hand. A lot of the mark-making characteristics of stylus-based tools are imparted into it through way an artist can adjust its angle an direction by wrist and finger motion.   More importantly, a mouse cannot detect pressure. A pressure-sensitive stylus is the optimal form factor to correctly duplicate traditional mark-making instruments whose tip is the delivery mechanism for the marks it makes. A great deal of the subtlety imparted into an expressive line by an artist is due to the varying hand pressure applied as the line is rendered. Pressure-sensitive input is only half of the story, however. Once the artist's gestural motion is captured, it needs to be interpreted by software that can do something with it.   Painter's initial charter was to faithfully replicate, as closely as possible, the catalog of traditional mark-making instruments used for expressive purposes. Mark and Tom's initial efforts centered on maximizing the data that streams from a pressure-sensitive tablet and creating a texture technology that interacts with the tablet data in real-time. Starting with the humble 2B lead pencil, Painter has grown into an extensive library of traditional mark-making tools recast into a digital medium. We use the term "Natural Media®" to refer to this technology. The library is by no means complete, but we continue to add to it with each new software release.   In recasting these tools into the digital realm, several major goals are accomplished. First, by utilizing the long-standing traditions of mark-making as a "first principle" of natural-media software, the computer becomes a valuable tool to the large number of people already familiar with traditional expressive graphic media. This has the benefit of allowing the artist's style to come through in the work they create with these tools. Secondly, by existing in digital form, media that were formerly thought of as mutually exclusive now flow effortlessly together. This offers the artist a greater range of possibility. Finally, and perhaps even more fundamental, is the fact that all of the major forms of communications media are now digital-based. Natural media software extends the range of expressive human gesture directly into these pervasive communications forms.   If re-casting traditional tools into digital equivalents were the sole charter of Fractal, my story would end here. But there is another core value we use to direct our efforts: Extend the range of expressive mark-making by taking advantage of the unique properties of the computer. In other words, to be able to make marks that no other mark-making tool has made before. This is the area that is most tantalizing to me as a toolmaker...the possibility of being able to contribute to the pantheon of expressive mark-making tools used by artists.   All art-making is wrapped up in creating a unique personal expression. A major challenge in working with expressive media is to take the same basic tools that have often been in use for centuries and arrive at a unique graphic statement. As both an artist and toolmaker, I find it particularly rewarding to be able to transfer this challenge inherently embodied in the use of the tools and extend it to the actual tool-making process.   A few years ago, the technology of 3-dimensional modeling reached the milestone of being able to render a synthetic scene with essentially photographic realism. My first encounter with such an image was a cover of Science magazine in the early '80's. It was an image of a Pixar rendered scene of a billiard table frozen at the moment of several balls in motion. The illusion was stunning. It was amazing to look at these images and realize that they were not of photographic origin. After the initial shock wore off, my response was, "So what? I can photograph the same thing much easier and less expensively." It took a few years, but the magic that lay beyond synthetic reality was fully realized in the landmark special effects that appeared in "Jurassic Park". Here, for all the world, were motion pictures of living dinosaurs. The rational side of our brains told us that they were mere cinematic illusion, and yet our eyes told us we were seeing the impossible.   For me, it is this magic that lies beyond mere imitation I find the most exciting. In 1992, Mark and I were sitting at an outdoor cafe during SIGGRAPH in Chicago. We were having one of our first brain-storming sessions. I pointed at some trees across the street and asked him why I should have to hand paint every leaf on a depiction of a tree. Couldn't we take advantage of the power of the computer to somehow sample an image of a tree and then allow it to proceed and just generate more "tree"? Well, it turns out that is no simple request, even with the power of a computer. What we did ultimately end up with is what we call the Image Hose.   The Image Hose is a mark-making tool that uses any group of image elements as a content source and sprays it onto the digital canvas. Using my tree story as an example, you can take a photograph of a tree, scan it into Painter and proceed to use various masking tools to extract individual leaf elements and then spray them out of the Image Hose. The result looks remarkably close to real leaf clusters with the benefit of being able to create an endlessly random tree texture. Once you grasp the technique of the Image Hose, the possibilities are endless. So, here is an example of a tool that uses the fundamental traditions of expressive mark-making as well as extends its vocabulary.   Another example of extending the range of mark-making tools is one that we recently introduced. It actually does "extend" expressive gestures: Net-Painter. As I mentioned earlier, all of the major communications media are now digitally based. A very high-profile aspect of this transformation is the Internet. Suddenly, the inter-connection of many of the computers spawned during the information revolution has reached a critical mass. The potential of an individual reaching a massive global audience has transformed itself into a reality. The meaning of publishing is changing before our eyes. Net Painter technology provides a way to broadcast, via the Internet, creative human gestures interactively to a far-reaching audience. Additionally, it is possible for real-time collaboration on a single image among several people to occur. Net Painter is so new we don't even know at this point exactly what impact it will ultimately have.   Who do we make these tools for? How do we intend for them to be used? I said earlier that we are close cousins to musical instrument makers. I believe our mutual intent is similar with regard to whom we make these instruments for. We initially draw upon our own experience and expertise creating art and then strive to craft the best possible expressive tools that we can. After the tools are in use, our users become co-collaborators by providing us with feedback. Our users, as well as musical instrument users, constitute a wide talent range. And, like a musical instrument such as a guitar or piano, they can be used to create great works of art or absolute drivel.   This is not to say that these tools should not be available to the casual user or hobbyist. A great deal of satisfaction (and frustration) can be experienced through interaction with creative tools, even for a novice. But it is only through disiplined experience with a creative medium that one comes to master personal expression. I can roll an orange on the black keys of a piano and make pretty sounds, but it may not be music.   I don't believe that a toolmaker should judge whether or not the output of their instruments in others' hands is "art". What is absolutely crucial is that they be filled with the zeal to create the best possible instruments their collective talents can muster. Just as the tools are capable of creating art, there is an art to creating the tools. As a toolmaker, the first person I must please is myself.   You can contact John Derry at FractlDsn1@aol.com       http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/derry/derry.html      
Saturday, 08 May 1999
Author:Francisco Mata Rosas
  In the context of new ways of producing, disseminating and reading photographic images, it is increasingly difficult to establish precise borders or frontiers among the types, techniques, interpretations, intentions or readings of photography. When we speak of documentary work, of which photographs are we not speaking? Does an image lose its documentary character because of the simple fact that it has been constructed? How can we establish the basic characteristics that define documentary photography? Is this method of photography a collection of certificates of authenticity? Is the non-documentary photograph nothing more than a heap of lies? The pillars that long sustained the philosophy and ethics of photography are changing, the advent of digital photography has accelerated the ethical discussions about the manipulation, and the truth, of images. This reformist wave has arrived in the pages of newspapers and magazines. At the same time, photographers are increasingly aware of the authorial nature of their work, even though it has to do with a concrete, direct task: informing. On the other hand, authors who never pretended to give their images an informational character have joined documentary territory through their photographs of themselves or their close surroundings. Such is the case with Nan Goldin, the photographer hung on these walls and winner of the Mother Jones prize. Speaking of straight photography no longer serves to define the term "documentary." For example, in the ultimate analysis Joel Peter Witkin uses straight photography and very few people would think of mentioning him as one of the great exponents of documentary work. Photojournalists increasingly elaborate complicated sets or abstractions to achieve weighty images that, when they are published in magazines and newspapers, can not be mistaken as anything other than documentary. Newspapers take advantage of photomontage to explain an event and their readers, even though they are perfectly conscious that they are looking at a collage, have no doubts about assigning credibility to these graphic documents. Parenthetically speaking, this style in the hands of Joseph Renau or Lola Alvarez Bravo is, without a doubt, an efficient ideological instrument that reflects highly concrete political and social situations. That is to say, they document the reality of their moment from a constructed foundation, from quotations, from the unreal. Neither can we define documentary photography as that which hews to a rigorous technical orthodoxy, because documentary photography is experimental. It uses the most sophisticated technology or primitive cameras, carrying photographic materials to their limits or doing without them. Everything mixes and combines. We find images that were taken in the most traditional ways, prints made on amate paper by computerized injections of ink, or images taken by digital cameras through electronic processes that are distributed within the classic frame of the newspaper. Essays by realists exaggerate the grain and the use of selenium to create dramatic effects. They photograph with films produced through high technology to obtain maximum definition and minimum grain, but using throw-away plastic cameras. They document using the cameras and aesthetics of the amateur. They create essays about small towns or communities that are widely published on the global village of the Internet. The decisive moment of Cartier-Bresson, is, in many instances, a computer command. And, of course, a lot of documentary photography is done with a Leica or a Nikon and gelatin silver prints using chemical processes. Can we then find a definition in the elemental materials of photography? Is reality as a subject the key? One of the ways that we have always understood this photography is as that which registers only what occurs, without getting in the way of or influencing the course of relations and situations that appear before us; as that photography which testifies how things happen. Robert Doisneau, master and pillar of direct photography only recently emerged from a scandal after it was discovered that one of his images (an image that had nearly become a monument), "The Kiss," was a staged photo. This photograph, that even bears the marks of "improvisation" and of having been taken "on the fly" -- such as movement, the out-of-focus foreground and elements that stain the composition -- was planned, directed, and staged by professional actors. This became public and in hardly any way has it affected the myth that surrounds it as a representation of an epoch, a sentiment, and, of course, a great documentary photograph. Another of the monsters from which many have learned, Eugene Smith, lit and staged many of his photographs. The most famous of the reportorial photographs he took of Minamata, such as the one of the child being bathed by his mother, an image that can not help recalling Michelangelo's Pieta, are example enough to prove this point. Of course, this does not deny that these photographs are the product of reality. What I mean to say is that they are not reality and that this distinction is not exclusive to documentary photography. Constructed photographs are also based in reality, refer to it, and try to explain it. On the road to a definition, we arrive on the grounds of the circulation and reception of the work. Does the key lie there? I don't presume to declare which space is the most natural for documentary photography. I don't know if it is best seen in the print media or in galleries. What I do know is that, without a doubt, as the context of the reading changes the sense of the message also changes. A photograph surrounded by a printed history and published at a certain moment, is not the same thing as a the same image hung on a wall and apparently taken out of both time and context. Most of all, it is divorced from its time; but this is not a condition exclusive to documentary photography. To the contrary. Let us imagine, for example, that the work of Pérez Butrón was published in a newspaper. Surely, not only the impact but also the message has been modified. And, of course, now that we mention this series, is there anyone who denies their reflexive intention when it comes to something so real as AIDs? Is this not a document of our time? Everything seems to indicate that I'm in the process of saying that every photographic act is a documentary act. But that isn't true. What we can agree on is that every photograph can be read from a documentary perspective -- if we consider that they respond to uncertainties, doubts, affirmations or negations of an epoch and the particular context of the creator; that they have to do with ideologies, crises, beliefs, dreams, utopias, realities, etcetera. Perhaps this all began when someone decided that black and white documentary photography reflected reality, without even questioning why we accept this when color is the reality. Now the idea is increasingly accepted that photography is only a representation and that, as such, it is shaded by its author. To speak here of an author, of the photography of an author, is not to speak of the signature on an image. It is not to speak of the photographer's coherent vision. It is to speak of making one's self responsible (in the same way that a writer does) for the content. To document is to interpret and communicate. To document is to be capable of perceiving and transmitting. To document is to reflect and share, to clarify by questioning, to question by affirming, to negate by showing, to help by hiding, to combat by unfolding, to understand by confronting. Documentary photography is breaking new trails in the same way as, and alongside with, communications. If this has always been the case, the influence is now more notable because of the way in which fixed images can be disseminated. Photography has dodged what many believed to be eminent death at the hands of live communication and moving images. Fixed photography is gaining an increasingly comfortable place in the tastes of consumers of information as a medium that permits a serene, reflexive review of the event that it presents us. At the same time, recognizing the authorial nature of documentary work where the principal actor is not only the reality but also the creator, the photographer takes on an enormous level of credibility, which makes the political or ideological use of the medium possible. This, of course, without forgetting the combination and context of the publication itself. Not long ago, we debated the competition between the fixed image and the moving image. Now, it seems to me, this debate becomes secondary as means of communication become common. That includes not only these two mediums, but sound, text, direction communication through the voice, etc. To debate the peculiarities of documentary work versus that which is not documentary (although even at this point I am not absolutely certain which is which), seems complicated to me. It reminds me of those roundtables that debated whether or not photography was an art. We can, in our all to human hunger for taxonomy, establish currents and styles, separate commercial photography from informative photography, including that which uses objects with which people work, and still life photography from that of movement. But to group photographic works as a function of whether they are documentary seems to me to be as unnatural as it is to define the term. One of the paradigms of modern photojournalism, Sebastián Salgado, says that photography can change absolutely nothing; that the most that it can hope for is to show that some things ought to be changed. I would dare say that what this meeting should aspire to do is to sow doubts and seek paths for our work. I insist that communication changes every day, as do its definitions and frontiers. What does not change is our human necessity to understand our surroundings and our times, to respond to stimuli that are increasingly complicated, and to the apparent "unreality" of reality. The end of a century through which we are living, where ethnic, religious, ideological, or economic breaches are increasingly deeper and permeate any effort at getting along; where political utopias have dissolved into rubble, bringing long-standing latent hatreds out into the open; where hyper technology exists alongside hyper poverty; where confusion appears to be carrying us to an entropic situation where, in midst of chaos, we can no longer distinguish error; where the concept of reality is so limited as to define our situation as surrealistic or as one of magical realism; photography has much to do, not only by informing in accord with the march of time, but also, and above all, through the representation of this ambiguous reality that invites reflection, through analysis and creative exposition, in that, as we remember, the action of seeing is an action of thought. I would like to close with these words from Diane Arbus:"si se observa la realidad desde bastante cerca...la realidad se vuelve fantástica." Let us understand this qualifier in an ambiguous way: as fascinating and as vain, this last being, or course, my own addition. Translation by Mitch Snow Francisco Mata Rosas is a photographer living and working in Mexico City, his images can be seen in the Gallery section of ZoneZero. Lecture given in December of 1995 in Mexico City at the Center of the Image, during the Mother Jones Foundation award ceremonies.       http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/mata/matatext.html    
Friday, 07 May 1999
Author:Shahidul Alam
    The school was near the Kamlapur railway station.The children used to live by the rail lines, in huts made of bamboo, polyethylene, rags and cardboard. I had promised them cameras, and to teach them to take pictures. Go to exhibition  
Thursday, 06 May 1999
Author:Lazaro Valdes
  Date: Thu, May 6, 1999, 7:07 PM   Please register me... Do I have an opinion I wish to share with you? In a nutshell: I love B/W because photography is not about 'real' and B/W is as far from real as one can get...And isn't that the point of all these images in our modern world?   laz  
Thursday, 06 May 1999
Author:Shahidul Alam
  Perceptions of the developing world I was staying with friends in Newry in Northern Ireland. Paddy and Deborah had kindly made their five year old daughter1s room available for me. Corrina was friendly and curious and would spend a lot of time in the room. One day as I was clearing my pockets of change I had accumulated, she suddenly remarked, "but you've got money, but, but you're from Bangladesh." The family had just returned from a trip to Bangladesh. Paddy was a development worker and they had visited many of the projects. At the tender age of five, Corrina knew that Bangladeshis did not have money.   Who portrays whom A recent fax from the National Geographic Society Television Division, to our picture library - dedicated to promoting the work of indigenous photographers and writers - asked if we could help them with the production of a film that would include the Bangladeshi cyclone of '91. They wanted specific help in locating "US, European or UN people ..... who would lead us to a suitable Bangladeshi family."   The situation is not unusual. Invariably films about the plight of people in developing countries show how desperate and helpless the people are, the people who realize their plight and come forward to their support are usually white foreigners. In some cases even local people are seen to be helping, but invariably it is a foreigner who has enlightened them about the way out, and it is always a foreign presenter who speaks out for them. The foreigner is so strong and forthright and so caring. She could almost hand over the microphone to them, if only they could speak for themselves, if only they understood.   The construction of a stereotype Wide angle b/w shots, grainy, high contrast images characterize the typical third world helpless victim. Huge billboards with a dying malnourished child in a corner with outstretched arms. A clear message in polished bold font in the top left corner cleverly left blank. The message reads "We shall always be there." A reality constructed for and by those who want us to forget the implications. That "you (the developing world) shall always be there." In that role (a passive existence necessary to be maintained) those who receive aid, the "client group," remain.   The assumptions and how they are validated The end product in all these cases is the same. The Western public gets to see a distorted view of the developing world. A situation for which the public in question can hardly be totally free of blame. School children in the UK think 50-75% of the worlds children are visibly malnourished (the real figure is less than 2%), and that only 10-20% of the world's six to twelve year olds start school (the real figure is almost 90%), and that the rate of population growth in the developing world is increasing (it is decreasing in every part of the developing world including Africa). The fact that a high proportion of the information about the developing world for the average western reader comes from fund raising campaigns is another cause of this gross distortion.   There is of course the other tack where "Third World Participation" is created in the form of guided tours to paid Third World journalists who are given what amounts to a censored view of well to do countries. In a recent tour of the United States organized by the United States Information Agency, I was accompanied throughout by a person from the State Department, and my request to visit Harlem was turned down due to "security reasons." My report on the trip was never made public. That people from the developing world do go on these trips and cater to these forms of tokenism is of course a slur on their own professionalism. Organizations like the World Bank do sponsor studies by people known to be mildly critical, with the proviso, that the World Bank would decide if the work would be published. Thereby retaining ultimate control.   The business of development Every organization has a goal, a means and a method. The apparent goal of donor organizations is to make the recipients self sufficient. For this it uses tax payer's money, usually a fraction of a percent of its GNP. Genuine aid also constitutes a tiny fraction of the recipient's income. The method varies, but invariably involves an input of a lot of personnel, and materials from the donor country which is paid for by the same money that was given out as aid. An organization's growth depends on its ability to generate more work. There are a limited number of recipient countries, a restricted market. All donor agencies compete for this small market. A recipient country that truly becomes self sufficient (unheard of in the history of development), no longer needs a donor. The donor agency, by fulfilling its manifesto would make itself redundant. The same applies for a development worker. The myth of humanitarian aid, however, has long been discarded, and the donors are now openly more concerned about governance, (how we spend their money) and there has been a visible shift towards administering the flow of funds rather than the humanitarian utilization of funds. Donor agencies invariably declare themselves to be non-political. The very act of giving money, or its equivalent, to people who are badly deprived is strongly political. The development worker is in a very powerful position. They are people who have to be pleased if one wants a loan, or access to education, or food.   The truth is, that despite all their claims about delegation, very little decision making involves local people. And very little decision making by the foreign experts involves in-depth local knowledge. It would be hazardous for these foreign experts to permit the infiltration of people who could penetrate their information chain, something that photographs are particularly good at doing. Culture, once considered a hindrance to development has now, become fashionable to promote. But it has to be a particular type of culture packaged in a particular type of way.   The "image business" is inextricably linked with the "development business." From slide shows in remote villages to slick exhibitions in posh hotels, from A5 flyers to coffee table books, from fund raising campaigns to annual reports, image hungry developmental agencies depend heavily on image makers. One feeds off the other. It is hardly surprising therefore that the image producers (read mostly white men photographers) produce images that are good for business for both industries. Development or fair representation doesn't enter the equation.   The Marketing Strategy There is of course the need (amongst industrialized nations) to show the results of donor aid. The recent major feature in the Observer newspaper in the UK on OXFAM, was called the Poverty Supplement, and in Observer's own words "The main aim of the Poverty Supplement was to persuade our readers to support OXFAM's work financially. This was obviously successful." The supplement was in fact an advertisement in the Observer to the tune of about #25,000. Pledges from the Observer readers amounted to a third of the annual budget for OXFAM's development partnerships in Zambia. When a similar proposal was made for CONCERN's projects in Bangladesh, though CONCERN had proposed a local photographer of international standing who had been working on the projects for over six years, and the Observer had initially agreed, they backed out in the last minute, and used a British photographer. They did however use stock photographs from the Bangladeshi photographer, but were only interested in the slum and poverty pictures which were a small part of the total work.   The power of images A camera can be a tool of extreme sensitivity or no sensitivity at all. A photograph can: 1) Be an eye check on memory 2) Give detailed information 3) Show what we cannot see 4) Store away complex data for future analysis More importantly it can influence people and create powerful emotional responses. We are aware of the meaning of words, but forget that images may have different meanings to different people, and that the meaning of a photograph can depend to a large extent on the context in which it is used. "The Camera never lies" is the biggest lie of all.     The need for a different type of education If we are to genuinely work for social change, what direction should developmental education go in? Teach local people about the fruits of good nutrition, family planning, education of their daughters. That is extremely important and is largely being attempted. What about teaching people (particularly development workers) to look for other options besides aid? What of creating role models of Bangladeshis running international developmental organizations, and giving these Bangladeshis the support and the clout necessary for them to succeed? What about foreigners trying to learn Bangla, and veering away from the policy that success in the development ladder correlates directly with a person's competence at English? What about use of images that show a positive aspect of the country rather than the fund collecting images of helpless destitutes? What about not distorting captions by substituting them with dramatized, orientalist plethora? What about desisting from patronizing the government and genuinely working with them rather than creating what is in effect a parallel government? What about teaching those working in development what the word really means?   The credit lines in articles dealing with poorer countries have no indigenous names. When questioned why this was so, picture editors and development workers claimed that there simply weren't people in these countries qualified to do the job. Their reliability, their professionalism, their ability to understand the brief was all suspect. In response we began to make a survey of indigenous photographers working in their own countries. The response, both in terms of numbers and the quality of the work was overwhelming. If a small organization based in Bangladesh armed with no more than lists obtained from interested friends can pool together an impressive list of talented indigenous photographers doing good work in their own countries why has it been so difficult for the development agencies to 'discover' them. Discovery is of course a key word when photographing the natives. The photographer steps down from the plane, 'discovers' the native and goes back with the scoop. That discovery implies past ignorance, seems to never get noticed. Yet there are people who did know the local people, understood their language, were respectful of their culture and understood the underlying causes of things. These are the people, skilled, available and able, who do not exist. They have not been discovered.   The history of photography fails to mention the work done by photographers in poorer countries. While the heroic feats of Hill and Adamson are extolled, the photographers who had to import all their equipment and materials from the wealthier countries and documented their cultures for little financial gain have never been registered in the archives. The few exceptions like Indian photographer Din Dayal, given the title Raja by the British who had been legitimized for having served the crown. Other much more important names in the field from the same period, like Ali Ahmed Khan, never get mentioned, puzzling until one remembers that Khan had led a rebel attack on British troops.   In five years of operation as a picture library based in the developing world, we have had many requests for images of Bangladesh by publishers, NGOs, donor agencies. The most frequently requested picture so far have been of the floods, cyclones, and slums. There was even a request for flood inundation of Dhaka in the floods in '93, which the client insisted had taken place. We have not for instance yet been asked for a picture of a person at a computer terminal, a very commonly stocked photograph in western libraries, and one which we too have several of. In one instance the client, an educational publisher in the UK insisted that our photograph of a tila (little stupa in the middle of a pond, used as cyclone shelters) was much too small and that they knew of huge giant stupas, which local photographers and community workers who had extensively combed the cyclone affected areas had never seen nor heard of.   The danger of being left out is not as great as the danger of being nullified. Books that teach you how to be a successful photographer, The ones that teach you the secrets of the trade, teach essentially how to become occidental. Since the person making the most important decisions regarding the usage of a photograph is invariably the person most distant from the event itself, the photographer's 'formula' for producing acceptable pictures is to regurgitate editorial policy regardless of what is observed. That is what the indigenous photographer must produce if he/she is to get ahead. That is what makes them begin to 'exist.' The danger therefore, is of becoming a sheep in wolf's clothing, and eventually of becoming a wolf.   Pretty much all NGOs seem to have the usual 'income generating activities,' the savings groups where the villagers gather round in a circle and sign the passbook, the functional education classes where village folk are taught urban middle-class expressions that even in cities only get used in formal situations. Where they are taught "the policeman is your friend..." and they know otherwise. Photographs of the activities of a hundred different NGOs would be largely identical. Where is the training to network that the donor circuit itself thrives on? Where is the emphasis on information technology that allows the richer countries to retain their stranglehold? The poor in these countries have been observed, analyzed and understood, but why have they been built a cell with no exit? Why are entire nations guinea pigs for foreign anthropologists, sociologists, economists and photographers?   In a recent effort by an independent agency to install E-Mail in Bangladesh for setting up an inter-nation and a South-South dialogue, it was discovered that many NGOs already had their own dedicated E-Mail line, but had not offered the service to others, even to other NGOs. Information appears to be a resource that people are very secretive about, access to information something developing countries are selectively denied. The nature of the images representing developing countries is an index of the media control that will prevent developing countries from developing. A Halloween song sums up some of the attitudes portrayed:   (Sung to the tune of WE THREE KINGS) We Trick or Treaters in bright costumes are Asking your help for children afar. We want no candy But cash is dandy, Here is our UNICEF jar. Oooooooooooooooooooh   Help the children, in foreign lands, They are starving Ð do what you can, They1ve nothing to eat Ð let alone no treats Reach out and help your fellow man. (there is now a non-sexist version with fellow human).   Shahidul Alam, Dhaka 30th May 1994 shahidul@drik.net       http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/shahidul/shahidul.html      
Thursday, 06 May 1999
Author:Diego Goldberg
    Since TV burst into our homes to stay, it has been competing and gaining territories from radio, magazines and newspapers. In the past these where the only intermediaries between the public and the world at large and information about the most trivial event or most exotic place was devoured. Today we travel around the world in installments and TV from space is an everyday event. As a result, television has been slowly eroding the power, electiveness and contents of newspapers and magazines which have had to adapt to these facts changing its goals and styles.   Photojournalism has to compete with TV as well, in content and technology. It is an intense competition but at the same time a liberating one. When photography appeared, painting could finally throw away the ballast of being the sole medium capable of reproducing reality which allowed for a revolution in language unsuspected until then. Today's papers carry yesterday's events which we have probably already seen on the evening news. The reader is therefore more interested in the different ways the information is presented to him rather than in the news themselves. In the text as well as in the pictures what matters most is analysis and point of view. Photojournalism in newspapers can then free itself from having to show every aspect of the daily events which have already been seen on TV.   Pictures have to offer the readers an innovative vision, different from the one proposed by television. It has to synthesize and surprise: photographers have to roam the borders of events and behind the scenes. They have to produce images that inform, amaze, move, discover hidden aspects of reality, that are not easily forgotten. The daily flood of televised images are the fast food of information: once digested they are erased. On the other hand when photography is enhanced with an informative, emotional or aesthetic component it stays in our memories.   Photography is a powerful means of expression and the photographer besides reporting the facts must use it as such. It is not enough to register the event in a supposedly objective manner: often, "objectivity" actually hides indolence. Splendid photographs are sometimes the product of circumstance, when the event is so extraordinary that its mere capture assures its greatness. But the images that succeed in ripping the curtains of the obvious can only be the product of a great effort: besides dominating the photographic language - composition and the use of light - what is needed is an attentive and perceptive eye, a knowledge of reality, a point of view, the ability and will to say something about what is being photographed.   Regarding new technologies, this example can help us imagine the future. Some days ago, the cover of Clarin, an Argentine newspaper, showed us in a conclusive manner with an image, how Claudio Cannigia, a soccer player, was in an illegal position in the field (this action was followed by his team scoring a goal which the referee validated anyway). Clarin had 4 photographers covering the match but none of them could get this document, which was the most important of the day. El Grýfico, the leading sports magazine, had 10 photographers but they couldn't capture the moment either. Clarin's photograph was lifted from the videotape of the match with a computer.   It's obvious that nobody can pretend that sports photographers have to cover all aspects of the game from every angle: this explains the need to use the TV feed, with the game taped in its entirety with many cameras from different positions. This is not the first time the print media uses still images produced by television. And it certainly won't be the last: this is a tendency that will grow stronger with new technological developments. What the future holds for us a is a restatement of the practices of photojournalism.   The first discussion that appeared with the arrival of digital photography (computers, scanners, film less cameras) was centered around the manipulation of the photographic image and its contents. This was a necessary discussion which was settled fairly quickly: after the first attempts to alter photographs with these new techniques the system's antibodies worked (inside and outside journalism) and today this practice has been mostly eradicated from the media, though nobody is exempt from a bad praxis, in pictures as well as in text.   The development of new technologies in the production, storage and distribution of images announce even more profound changes. In an first stage, the cyber-photojournalist will arrive to the soccer stadium with his high definition video camera: a still image has the same definition of a 35mm film frame. He will place himself in the best place according to his experience and talent and instead of photographing the action he will tape in shorts bursts of video a whole play, for instance from the corner kick to the goal and the celebration. Back at the paper he will look at his work on the computer screen and chose the perfect image to illustrate the story.   In a second stage he will probably send a live feed to the photo department and the picture editor will chose the images as they are being sent. At the same time he will be in constant communication with the photographer (actually video journalist ) and he may suggest new angles or emphasis according to the changing nature of the story. For the first time, the "decisive moment" will change hands from the photographer to the editor. A way of working, which was dependent on the photographer's reflexes and some luck, will have disappeared.   The mergers of communication companies which is happening globally (Time-Warner, Disney-ABC, Murdoch, etc) is explained in part by the hoped for synergy between the different parts of each conglomerate. An so, in a third stage, it is certainly possible that a picture editor will choose the images he needs for his paper from the high definition feed of the TV channel belonging to the group, liberating the photographer from the technical aspects of the game. At the same time, with the arrival of the electronic versions of newspapers and magazines on the Internet, it will be possible to click the mouse on a photograph and have the whole video sequence of the action.   These speculations are obviously referred to certain events, particularly those subjects were action plays a dominant role and there are numerous unforeseen elements difficult to control like demonstrations, sports, rock concerts, some fashion, etc.   The video journalist will cover certain information and the photojournalist will still use the more traditional formats (digital, with still image transmission capabilities) to cover other types of stories: reportage, documentary photography, portraits, fashion, etc.   In both cases we will still need his talent and capabilities to tell us how he sees the world.       http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/goldberg/tvandfuture.html      
Wednesday, 05 May 1999
Author:Pedro Meyer
  October 13 - 17, 1995, Crested Butte, CO A narrative by Pedro Meyer   Photography is story telling through visual means. I use the camera to tell stories. I now use the computer to make the camera tell ever more interesting ideas, while the internet allows for this marriage - between the computer and the camera - to deliver such stories all over the world. I arrived at Crested Butte,Colorado at night. The sky was heavy with darkness in between the thunder bolts which reminded me of a flash coming from a gigantic camera in space. The Universe was taking pictures of itself at night. I have done that sometimes myself, but never during a rain storm. I think I will try that someday.   Go to exhibition  
Tuesday, 04 May 1999
Author:Colin Jacobson
  "Magnum Photos which was founded by Cartier-Bresson, Robert Capa, George Rodger and others to set new photo-journalistic standards, has recently allowed several of its pictures to be used in advertisements. Colin Jacobson argues that this threatens the agency's original values and sets a dangerous precedent."   Strange things are happening in the world of contemporary photojournalism. As less and less reportage photography is published in magazines and books, it is generally accepted that photojournalism is in crisis. At the same time, the advertising industry finds documentary images increasingly attractive. Sebastiao Salgado, perhaps the most celebrated photojournalist of our time, has been commissioned to take pictures for car and cigarette advertisements. Also, a campaign for Hugo Boss recently used three established British photographers working in the black and white documentary tradition.   Like many other picture agencies, Magnum, the world famous photography cooperative, has recognized this lucrative market place. Liz Grogan, head of commercial sales at Magnum's London office, denies that this is anything new, and points out that Elliot Erwitt, famous for his humorous work, was selling images to advertisers 30 years ago.   Magnum is renowned for its humanitarian objectives. Its name is synonymous with honesty and integrity. It was founded almost 50 years ago, on the basis that a photographer's individual responsibility was paramount, as was respect for the subjects photographed. Recent examples of reportage advertising involving Magnum photographs demonstrate the difficulties raised when editorial images are re-used in an entirely new, and commercial, context. The advertisements for Pepe jeans and Fiat finance, use photographs by Martin Parr, a relatively recent Magnum member. They constitute deliberate secondary use of images removed from their original purpose and setting, accompanied by captions which are knowingly insulting to the individuals depicted.   Liz Grogan defends the situation: "Where we can, we try the individuals concerned [in the photograph], although often leave that to the advertising agency. Parr concurs: "I find out what the advertisement is for , seek to track down the people in the photo, offer them a payment. It's their decision." In the case of the Fiat advertisement, where the individuals could not be traced, Magnum asked the agency to put aside money in case they should come forward.   The people featured in the Pepe advert gave their permission, and received payment, but does this absolve Magnum from their responsibility for allowing the photographs to be used in this way? What is at stake is not just the nature of the advertising, or even how editorial photographers and their agents view this rich market for their work. There is a more fundamental matter, which goes to the heart of the vulnerable and delicate relationships which photographers have with the people they photograph.   In the case of Martin Parr, the debate takes on added significance, because he is a documentary photographer well known by the general public in Britain, and very famous abroad. His stylistic approach has been widely imitated by contemporary photographers, and is generally perceived to represent a rejection of the black and white documentary tradition passed down by magazines such as Picture Post and Life. His work has been constantly published in leading magazines throughout the 1980's and 90's. He has been featured several times on British TV and being promoted overseas by the British counsil. He recently had two exhibitions running concurrently at major venues in France.   In an interview which Parr gave to the British Journal of Photography in 1993, he said: "I use prejudice as a starring point. I then build a body of work on the prejudice associated with that subject. By subverting a subject I invite people to exercise their prejudice... I take pictures of what I feel needs to be photographed; I am exploring my own intuitive sense of what I find interesting. When you do that, many issues may evolve, but it is not my role to resolve them." We may legitimately ask, in the case of advertisements, whose role is it, then?   Grogan makes her position clear: "I always check with the photographer about any specific usage, but Magnum has no overall policy on advertising. It is up to the photographer to agree or refuse." Martin Parr: "I judge each image on its merits, but it is difficult to pin down what is legitimate and what is not. There are no set ground rules." He acknowledges that the Pepe adverts were borderline cases, but: "The people in the pictures were told about the captions, and it was up to them to agree or refuse." It is worth recalling that many Magnum archive prints bear a stamp on the reverse requiring users to respect the integrity of the image and the spirit of the captions.   The picture in the first two Pepe ads was originally part of a large project on the British middle classes. It shows a Conservative Party summer fête. Using Parr's yardstick, what prejudice are we being invited to exercise here? Do we laugh at the odd way in which these people stand, or dress, or look? Or do we delve further into the value-systems we attribute to these individuals? Surely, they are mealy-mouthed, narrow-minded little-Englanders? But we are all uneasy facing a camera, and specially one suddenly thrust at you like an offensive weapon. (Parr on his working methods: "I go in very close to people because it's the only way you can get the picture. You go right up to them. Even now, I don't find it easy. I pretend to be focussing elsewhere... I don't try and hide what I'm doing - that would be folly" BJP, 1989.)   The fact is, neither we nor Parr know anything about these individuals, other than they were attending a Tory garden party. They are, therefore, being used as props in a photographic sideshow; the pictures invite us to throw sponges at the cardboard cut-outs. It would be disconcerting for Parr if he were to discover that these individuals were actually rather kind and caring, and did not believe that criminals should be flogged in public. As a photographer, he cannot afford to know anything about them as people, because this would upset his attitudinal apple cart. (The second Pepe ad featuring a man on a lawnmower reads: "Cut this out and stick it up your arse.")   So, three people at a particular summer fete in Bath, end up in an advert for trendy jeans with a derogatory copy line: " The world is full of people you hope you'll never meet." The advertiser's technique is more overt than Parr's own; these gruesome people wouldn't be seen dead with these people. Have the "Creatives" at the advertising agency fallen into Parr's prejudicial trap, assuming that the picture was originally taken as a form of cultural subversion? Or have they recognized that in Parr's work, human beings are just symbols being used to sustain and reinforce a predetermined set of values and attitudes? In that case, photographs taken in one specific situation can be used in any other. As Parr himself said: "Anyone can be made to look like an idiot. I am aware at times what an idiot I would look photographed."   Photographer David Hurn, a member of Magnum for years, ponders on this matter: "There is nothing wrong as such with a photograph being used out of context. Prints get sold these days for a lot of money, and many famous photographers exhibit work which was originally taken for editorial reproduction." When it comes to advertising, however, Hurn believes it is more difficult. "If an editorial photograph is being used to sell a product, I am more concerned about its tone, Is it vulgar, or not? Is it decent and honest? Photographers have no right to abuse other human beings."   Another advert creates real problems for the value system which Magnum represents. It was taken in the early 1980s as part of an extended photographic essay on new Brighton, a working-class holiday resort close to Merseyside. It was, therefore, a caught moment, and perfectly legitimate. But such is the power of modern iconography, that the image subsequently appeared in a much later body of Parr's work entitled Bored Couples, a series of photographs chosen by him to illustrate the thesis that in many modern marriages or relationships, individuals are bored with each other. Here we have a triple-whammy. A picture taken in one reportage context over a decade ago has been extracted and given a new and secondary meaning in a very different visual setting. And now, Parr has allowed it to be published a third time in a commercial context with a deliberately pejorative caption: "No interest for two years."   Magnum were unable to trace the two people involved, but nevertheless gave permission for the photograph to be used. There's a strong possibility that the relatives of the man and woman are still alive. It doesn't take much imagination to guess how they would feel seeing the way a casual image of members of their family, taken at the seaside long ago, has been used in an equally casual way, with an extremely insulting inference to sell finance for Fiats. Once again, the message is clear; particular individuals are uninteresting and unimportant in their own right. they are merely types or caricatures, captures in a vulturistic manner to convey a set of social and cultural attitudes and reinforce the photographer's view of the world. Neither we nor Martin Parr have any idea whether this couple really are bored with each other, indeed we don't even know for certain that they are a couple. They may might be brother and sister, or even strangers. The photographer shows an uncaring arrogance in his assumption that they have nothing to say each other, and it fits his purpose to stick to this, if not through thick and thin, the through a book and a financially rewarding advertisement. In the USA, the family of this 'couple' would surely take Magnum and Parr to the cleaners, and who could blame them? However as Liz Grogan points out, Magnum, like most other agencies, would not accept responsibility. "In any commercial exploitation of Magnum pictures, the user takes responsibility for any legal come-back. The advertising agency signs an indemnification clause against any litigation."   Martin Parr has been hailed as an extraordinary talent, indeed the dazzling talent of his generation. In the '80s, he seemed to be showing us the unfortunate victims of an awful society, in which greed was worshipped. But far from exposing this malaise, these advertisements make it clear that Parr is part of it. By allowing his work to appear in this way, knowing what the captions would say, and aware that the subjects of the pictures would be paid, Parr is inextricably involved in the very sickness it was said he was trying to reveal. He is part of problem and not of the solution. Perhaps he was just sneering all along.   David Hurn provides the final word on the implications of Parr's decision to agree to these advertisements: "I squirm for the memory of George Rodger (a founding father of Magnum who died last summer). Martin represents the genre of anarchic irreverence for everything, and he is perfectly in tune with his times. Is this way Magnum want to go? ·   Martin Parr's Small World is at Portfolio Gallery, Edinburgh (0131-220-1911) from July 5 to August 1   Colin Jacobson is a freelance picture editor and visiting lecturer in the Centre for Journalism Studies, Cardiff University and can be reached at: 106313.1070@compuserve.com   http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/jacobson/magnum1.html  
Tuesday, 04 May 1999
Author:Photographys B.H. JIANG
  Heaven and Earth are without pity; To them the ten thousand things are but straw dogs. Lao Tse, sixth century B.C. (from Ten Thousand Things: all life forms)   I still don't know for certain how Mr. B.H. Jiang found me, or why he decided to put his faith in a total stranger. It is one of those things that happens nowadays on the Internet. And, because it happens so casually, so innocently, it takes a while for us to realize that it is altogether marvelous.   It was several months ago that it began. Late one night, as I made a routine check of my e-mail, a new message appeared with the subject "photographer," and it brought with it a rather hefty attachment of files. The address indicated that the message had come from a "jbh" in Guangzhou, China. As it happens I have a friend with those same initials, and as it happens he is a photographer who went off several years ago to work in Asia. The message read simply: "Mr. beardsley How are you." That "Mr. beardsley" was particularly puzzling because it occurred to me that my old friend would never have been so formal, not even long ago when he was my student.     Soon enough, however, it was clear that my old student remains lost in Asia and that I have a new friend in the person of Mr. B.H. Jiang (or, as it is written in Chinese, Jiang Bao Heng -- jbh -- with the last name coming first). Mr. Jiang, it turns out, is a man in his thirties who supports himself and his photography by working as a computer salesman in Guangzhou. Guangzhou is a city of over six million people, one of those burgeoning new industrial giants that dot the Pearl River Delta in southeastern China.   It is the capital of Guangdong Province that takes in the cities of Hong Kong (since July 1, 1997), Huizhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan, Jiangmen, Zhongshan, and Zuhai. The "registered" population of the delta is said to be about 25 million persons. The "unregistered" population, which includes migrant laborers who come from the interior of China hoping to share in the growing prosperity of these new "special economic zones".                         May account for at least another five million persons; some put the number much higher. Mr. Jiang, like so many others looking to improve their lives, came to Guangzhou from Yangzun City, which is further north in Anhwei Province.   I might not have paid much attention to Mr. Jiang had it not been for the photographs he had attached to the first message. I have this past year heard from a number of photographers in Asia, most of them living outside mainland China. All are very competent, even sophisticated, but many also seem too much influenced by some of the worst models in western culture; for the viewer there is little chance of engagement, and in consequence their work is wont to remain, as historian Edgar Wind would say, a passing parade.   Mr. Jiang's photographs, however, are of a different order.They are almost innocent. Most are straightforward black and white photographs of children or scenes of people, many of them plainly living on the edge of modern Chinese society.Most of the children are obviously in poor circumstances, some clearly belonging to minority groups. But the most interesting characteristic of this body of work, its strength, is in the approach to the subjects.   Mr. Jiang is respectful, even loving, in a way that seems trustworthy. Moreover, it is one of the few instances where I feel I have encountered a wholly Chinese sensibility at work. In short, I came away with the feeling that for a moment my own eyes were permitted to be Chinese, and that my understanding of what it is to be a human being in these particulars had suddenly increased.         I now have digital representatives of more than a hundred photographs made by Mr. Jiang over several years, including photographs of many more children and adults, a record of a harvest festival for Tibetan (made on one of his excursions outside Guangdong Province to Szechwan Provice in Central China), and a very interesting group of color photographs of "boat people" and "peasants" made in Yangchun on the Muyang river.             Newspaper and magazine reports tell me that the rivers yield few fish nowadays because most are polluted owing to over-population and rapid industrial development. How these people might make a life, then, becomes a puzzle. Most of the children photographed live in a remote village called Pingshi,which is about 150 miles west of Guangzhou, and part of a district called "Yubei" -- described by Mr. Jiang as a region stretching from Lianan (near Qingyuan in the east) to Pingshi (near Shaoguan in the west). The people of this area do in fact belong to minority groups, he told me later. The government refers to them simply as either the "Red Group" or the "White Group."           For the presentation on these pages I have selected photographs made in Pingshi, Lianan, Yangchun, and in the vicinity of Guangzhou. There are no titles for the photographs, only file numbers with initials indicating where they were made -- LN refers to Lianan, YC to Yangchun, JZ is Szechwan Province, but J and CLN remain something of a mystery until either Mr. Jiang or our translator can provide better information. It may help to refer to the map I have provided based on information given to me by Mr. Jiang.             I have included below portions of messages sent to me by Mr. Jiang. They offer a very interesting picture of life in this "new China," and they give us a glimpse inside the life and struggle of one of its photographers. We learn from Mr. Jiang, for example, that in China today public interest in "serious" photography is practically nil.                 Millions of people own cameras and make photographs, but for most it is a kind of sport (though, in fact, I just received from another friend a copy of a 1965 Hong Kong Camera Club publication that offers proof that photography is by no means a new sport in China). But for all the popularity of photography in China today, it remains an "activity," and not yet a practice. Sadly, there are no commercial galleries, museums, or other institutions that might support and encourage photography.As Mr. Jiang tells us in one note, "[photographs] were sold just like trash. But let him tell you the story.             His words have the same economy of means and plain grace of his photographs," and what he has to say about his photographs, about the lives of hissubjects, and about the conditions in China today for photography and photographers is worth our attention. English remains a struggle for Mr. Jiang, so most of the messages were composed in Chinese.               I'm confident that the translations we obtained have captured both the spirit and meaning of his words. Mr. Jiang (writing in English) concerning himself and his work: I am a guy who forever is taking photos, and I always went outside to shoot some photos about people and view. These photos were taken in a poor village far from Guangzhou, and the people live a poor life, but the people out there were honest and hard working. So I have taken many photos in the village. I hope the people in the world can take care of these poor children through the pictures. The pictures which I sent to you were a part of me.   More about himself and the photographs of the children, this time writing in Chinese (and, in fact, from here on he writes most of his messages in Chinese): My job is related to selling computers... but because of certain limitations, I can only take pictures during my spare time. These photos were taken in November of last year [1996]. They were taken in the "Yuebei" area of Guangdong Province. The Yuebei area is a poor part of Guangdong Province. People are dependent on agriculture for living. Since it's far from a city and transportation is inconvenient, the educational opportunities are limited, and their thinking is still very innocent and pure.     They haven't been influenced by modern society. They are living life freely and without worry. The children of this place study in low quality schools. A lot of the children have to walk at least ten miles on hilly roads to go to school.These reasons stimulated my desire and creativity to use cameras to record their daily activities. The children are poor and still so innocent. This kind of thing is not possible to capture in the cities. Also, the reason we want to capture the pictures is for people in the cities to know that there are a lot of other poor people in our society and to let them know the reality.                     Concerning his camera and darkroom: My camera quality is not very good, so the contrast might not be that good... The photos I'm sending you here I directly made them from negatives, so they were not processed. I'm using a limited-range lens, so the contrast is not precise. I read some books about Ansel Adams, and I also know something about his "zone system" of photography. But my darkroom is rather rudimentary, so I am having some production difficulty.   About Hong Kong and also the idea of exhibiting on the Internet: How are you. First, thank you for your concern over Hong Kong's matter. This thing makes every Chinese very happy.It washed off 150 years of humiliation. We will stand up in the world again. I learned that you are going to display my photographs on the Internet.     I will make more pictures using my eyes to discover more things to display the great Chinese people to the world. Let the world understand and care for the Chinese people. Let them know in the Old East there is a group of never-yielding people who are stubbornly laboring for humankind. Our lifestyle and thinking are different from westerners... but we all of the humankind.   Recent note concerning black and white vs. color photographs: I like to take black and white pictures, because color will make people see less. Black and white makes it more interesting.   Concerning the plight of photography in China: Some time ago, there was news in the papers about a flea market in Peking, of photographs selling for [Chinese amount of $2 to $3]. If you buy more, they sell to you in terms of weight. So there was a famous photographer, who as a result bought several kilograms of photographs. This photographer was very saddened. He said in our country we really don't value photography. These photos, some of them, have won national or international awards. In each photo there is a lot of time and money. However, they were sold just like trash.   And this is truly the biggest sadness of Chinese photographers. Their art is worthless. Therefore, if you want to live as a photographer, it's impossible. Over here, the most you can get is [he gives a vague amount: over $10, and under $100]. This amount is not even enough for buying the film. Chinese photographers live in hardship.     Clarifying the location of villages and the identity of the people: Yubei is in Guangdong [Canton] Province. It refers to the area made up of Shaoguan and Qingyuan. Therefore, you will not find it on the map. The photos I took were at Pingshi in Shaoguan, and at Lianan in Qingyuan. Yaozu is a minority group. There are two different sub-groups. One is the White Group, the other is the Red Group. All live in poor, far-away little towns. The White Group usually wear clothes with black and white colors. Their standard of living is very low.   Their yearly income is about 500 Chinese dollars [about US $66]. My monthly income is 2,500 [about US $332]. I am showing you these pictures I took ... in Yangchun City... This place is about 300 miles from Guangzhou. This is a poor place... we took a lot of pictures to reflect the life there. I am hoping to get some sympathetic response... This is an agricultural town, and I'm sending these pictures which reflect the boat people. Their ancestors lived on the boat. Boats are their homes. These boats are not for fishing anymore, this is where they live.   Weather extremes: June: That day the weather was very hot, over 35 degrees Celsius. That day all of us got sunburn. Even though taking pictures is hard work, I feel it's very meaningful. July-August: Recently I haven't written you much. Last Sunday I was going to Lianan, to take pictures. However, recently the weather is not very good. It rains every day. As a result, the road to Lianan was being flooded, and there were some mud slides, so the traffic is being blocked. As a result, I was not able to go. If the weather gets better, I plan to go on Friday.     On "modern" Chinese life and his own feelings: Right now in China, a lot of young people are very empty... They feel life is not interesting. When they work, they don't shoot for perfection. Every day they are just wasting their time. They don't have any ideals. In the modern society, if you cannot make your dream come true, it's very sad. This also includes me, because the pressure from life is great. Every day I feel very nervous. I feel there is no future... Every day I have to do a lot of so many other things, so sometimes I feel down. Some time ago, I planned to go to Lianan to take pictures. However, because I had a serious stomach problem, I didn't go. However, now I plan to go to a small fishing village to take some pictures...   Mr. Jiang's most recent communications indicate that he is intent on establishing a website to promote the work of mainland Chinese photographers as well as to provide a place where they can exchange information about photography and other issues. It is my hope to see more photographers like Mr. Jiang come forward. Perhaps then we will begin to see more of the Chinese sensibility that has been struggling to emerge and take hold on a broad scale. When it does, we will all be the richer for it.   E. R. Beardsley September 1997                   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Special thanks to Marina Tackett, for her generous help in translating communications between China and the U.S. A native of Taiwan, Ms. Tackett is working toward her Ph.D. in cultural anthropology at the University of Oregon. She plans to return to Taiwan in 1998, where she will work with children of the Bunan tribe, the fourth-largest indigenous group in Taiwan." She also loves photography.   Thanks also go to Ms. Zou Huan, a student from China who is currently studying at the University of Oregon. Ms. Zou was most helpful in the early stages of communications between China and the U.S.   Thanks must certainly go to Mr. Steve McQuiddy and Ms. Debby Coulthard of Eugene, Oregon, for numerous and varied contributions that have saved me much anguish and hard work, particularly in the matter of finding willing Chinese translators at a time when most people are away from campus on vacation.   My gratitude also goes to Mr. Pedro Meyer for the invitation to present Mr. Jiang's work at ZoneZero , to Mr. Mike Lee for his willingness to place a version of this exhibit on the Intangible web site, and to Mr. Ted Fisher, Media Projects Coordinator, UCR's California Museum of Photography for his invitation to place a version of the exhibit on the museum's web site.         http://zonezero.com/magazine/articles/jiang/p1.html    
Monday, 03 May 1999
Author:Manuel Muñoz García
  Date: Sun, May 2, 1999, 7:34 AM   Recientemente he incluido un link a ZoneZero en mi Web Site con el siguiente texTo: register@zonezero.com   Pedro Meyer es el editor de ZoneZero, donde se puede visitar la mejor colección de imágenes que he visto en la red. Los trabajos son de diversos autores que presentan "sus historias" mediante una colección de fotos. El trabajo editorial de Pedro es impresionante. ZoneZero es el sitio que visito con más frecuencia y el primero entre los favoritos de mi navegador.   Saludos Manuel Muñoz  
Sunday, 02 May 1999
Author:Dirck Halstead
    I was asked on the National Press Photographers’ list, what it was like to discover a picture from two years ago that turned out to be the "picture of the week".   There have been lots of rumors running through the photo journalistic community about the picture that was the cover of TIME magazine, showing Monica Lewinsky, her red lips glowing, her eyes closed in anticipation, being embraced by President Clinton at a fund raising event in October of 1996. Here, from the photographer’s finger-tips, is exactly what happened.   I have a theory that every time the shutter captures a frame, that image is recorded, at a very low threshold in the brain of the photographer. I have heard this over and over from photographers around the world. It doesn’t matter if the photographer saw the processed image or not. These split seconds, as the mirror returns, are recorded as "photographic lint" on the mind of the photographer.   When the photographs of Monica Lewinsky, in her beret, on the lawn of the White House, emerged in February of this year, I KNEW I had seen that face with the President. I had no idea when, or where. When I take photographs on assignment for TIME covering the White House, which I do every third month (nobody could do it more), the pictures first go to the magazine. They have first-time rights on the photos. Once they have gone through the take, and pulled a few selects for the TIME-LIFE picture collection, the take goes to my agent, GAMMA-LIAISON. They then comb the take a second time, and pull their selects. Eventually, the take comes back to me, and resides in my light-room until I sort through it again, then send everything to the University of Texas, which is where my archives reside. Because I am busy, I only get around to sending the pictures to Texas about every 18 months.   When the Lewinsky story broke, all these organizations started to go through their files, and found nothing. I hired a researcher, and she started to go through the piles of slides in the light room. After four days, and more than 5,000 slides, she found ONE image, from a fund-raising event in 1996. By that time, the original "news break" was over. I told TIME we had found an image, and sent it to New York. We all agreed that this was an important image, but the story had moved away from us. So, we all sat on the picture for six months. When you think about it, that is incredible. Not only TIME, but also Gamma-Liaison kept a secret for six months.   When Monica went to the prosecutors, and offered her testimony, the story went back to page one. At this point, TIME and the agency went into action. The photo was run as a cover on TIME, and is now in magazines and newspapers around the world. So, what is the lesson from this episode? I wrote several months ago about David Rubinger talking about how important our archives are. I would rest the case on this example.   One of the things that become clear is that first, the wires, could not find this photo, even after it was released in their files. That may be due to several problems. First, they have cut back on their support staff - who is going to go through their photos ? The reality is that after several months, out takes go into ware houses. If the photographers to the left and right of me on that stage, that night, were shooting digital, they probably erased the files ( Monica, who ?) The networks, once TIME released the photo, were able to go back into pool footage and find the picture . However, we have not seen anything from the other photographers who were there, other than an amateur photographer who was in the crowd, and whose photo was the cover of NEWSWEEK.   I will make some money from this picture (not nearly as much as most people think), but if I did not own my photographs, if I did not go through them, the picture would never had emerged. That is why ownership of your photographs is SO important. The simple fact is that no organization has the "memory of the image" that the photographer who took it has. The people who want "work for hire" from photographers, also disassociate their greatest asset from the thing that they have to sell. A last note...I am not talking about Monica versus the President...who is lying and who is not...I am talking about the photographers who record history, and have an obligation to make those photographs available to future generations.   Please go to the excellent web page on photojournalism that is run by Dirk Halstead: http://digitaljournalist.org         http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/halstead/monica.html    
Sunday, 02 May 1999
Author: Pablo Cabado
      "One day Cartier-Bresson received a telephone call from the writer JL Borges, who wished to know whether he would be willing to accept a prize for which Borges wanted to nominate him. The prize was offered by a rich woman who lived in Sicily. It was for artists of all kinds. What distinguished this prize from most others was that it was the previous prize winner who nominated, after two years, the next one. And today Borges wanted to give the prize to Cartier -Bresson. Why me? he asked. Because I am blind, said Borges, and I want to give it to you in recognition of your eyes. Cartier-Bresson felt he could not refuse Borges and so he traveled to Palermo for the award ceremony. There he was put up in a highly reputed old hotel. Its name, or something about it, seemed familiar to him. Finally he found out why. It was the hotel his parents had gone to on their honeymoon. He was born nine months later.In this same hotel, where he was lodged because his eyes had won a prize, he had been conceived"         http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/borges/borges.html    
Sunday, 02 May 1999
Author:Fernando Castro R.
    Luis González Palma's work was first shown in Houston in 1992 as part of the Latin American exhibits of FotoFest. If one were to ask retrospectively what exactly it was that was so impressive about his work, an important answer would be: his portraits of indigenous peoples of Guatemala like "La rosa" (1989) and "La esperanza" (1990). I reluctantly call them "portraits" because they are not intended as depictions of the individuals they denote; but rather, as impersonations of archetypical characters of myth, popular culture and/or the poetic imagination of the artist. 1 González Palma has continued, mutatis mutandis , producing these portraits throughout the nineties: "El soldado" (1993), "El casco" (1994); and more recently, "80 mm, 5.6" (1998), "La mirada crítica"(1998), and "Trama y urdidumbre" (1998).   Other portraits of Guatemalan Native-Americans had been featured at FotoFest '90 in the work of Hans Namuth Los Todos Santeros. 2 But Namuth's work, although impressive in its own right, is fairly straightforward whereas González Palma's work (not plain Palma, as some would have it) follows different paths —zigzaging along, crisscrossing others' paths, and branching off into untrodden territories. In order to understand a little better González Palma's work, I will attempt to walk along those paths.   The obvious and most conspicuous place to start is tone. González Palma's prints are generally glazed with a dark sepia medium that tones all but selected portions of his prints. Various interpretations have been given for this prominent feature of his work. Some have found in this earthy monochromaticism a connection with Goya's dark paintings. Others have connected it with the way paintings and frescoes in churches look after hundreds of years of exposure to the smoke of candles, incense, and the exhalations of devotees. Others have underscored the resemblance that his toned prints have with the bark on which ancient Mayans alledgedly wrote. 3 This last suggestion is particularly germane because, according to the Popol Vuh , the first act of creation is dawn; and bringing the world out of darkness is part of González Palma's poetics. These interpretations are not mutually exclusive; more than likely, González Palma is plugging into all these outlets simultaneously —thus exemplifying a culturally diverse tradition of image-making and exposing his own aesthetic eclecticism.   In many of González Palma's portraits only the eyes of the subjects are spared the sepia tone so as to imbue their gaze with an engaging, confrontational, and almost hypnotic quality. Take the case of "America" (1990), a portrait of a young woman whose name happens to be 'America' —the title is both exact and metonymic. The white of the eyes irradiates a light that subliminally leads the viewer into St. Augustine's intuition that its source is the luminosity of the spirit. Through toning González Palma establishes a metaphor central to much of his work; namely, that the life of many indigenous Guatemalans transpires in darkness (the sepia tone) although their spirit (the glistening eyes) prevails and endures. It is clear that González Palma endorses their cause and makes the brunt of his oeuvre bear a political message for their liberation. Many would argue that the political impact of art beyond the narrow boundaries of the artworld is more often the unwitting design of censors. 4 But González Palma belongs to that breed of artists who believe that art itself has a spiritual luminosity and power whose social effects should not be underestimated.   The depiction of González Palma's indigenous subjects is a way of changing the historical perceptions about them for themselves and for others. Pedagogically, it is a forced act of self-knowledge whose main lesson is: "You are the protagonists of your own history." Unfortunately, what is scream for some is heard as song by others who see only the exoticism of the imagery. This kind of ambivalency is characteristic of great ideological paradigms like beauty or freedom.On one interpretation, for example, the luminous gazes are the light of reason: human rights, republicanism, and rationality (ideals of the Enlightenment). Therein lies a connection with Goya's Capricho "El sueño de la razón produce monstruos" which has an ambiguity that reveals the bright and dark sides of reason. 5 From the Native-American perspective, "Enlightened" rationality has been a double-edged sword insofar as it has been the conceptual tool for liberation as well as for exploitation. González Palma has explicitly pointed to that ambivalency in one of his most conceptual and avant garde installations: "Historias Paralelas" (1995).The installation consists of a series of transparencies of white shirts ridden with bullet holes. González Palma identifies the shirts of "Parallel Histories" as those of Maximilian, Archduke of Austria who, in 1864, was imposed on Mexico as emperor by Napoleon III and Mexican conservatives. 6 In an epoch when for the very first time a Zapotec Native-American, Benito Juárez, was elected president of México (a process for which Enlightenment ideals are partially responsible), a European monarch was forced militarily on a sovereign American republic. Ironically, Maximilian turned out to be more liberal (read, "Enlightened") than the Mexican reactionaries would have wished; Juárez shared more reformist views with him than with some of his own allies. Nevertheless, Juárez ordered his execution not only because Maximilian himself had ordered the execution of republican guerrilleros but also because he was the incarnation of imperialism. Thus, "Historias Paralelas" is also a reflection on the impersonality of violence; i.e., it was not Maximilian's person that was important in deciding his execution but his investiture symbolized by his shirt.   An equally important feature of González Palma's work is the way he consistently endows the image of Native-Americans with an almost irresistible beauty. 7 To do so, González Palma slides the canons of European beauty along indigenous traits —a concept spelled out in "Reflejo" (1998). The trinity —beauty, truth and goodness— is a Platonic amalgam whose persuasive power has not dwindled since antiquity, but whose currency was challenged —among others— by the art of the historical European avant-garde. German artists of the socalled New Objectivity movement, like Max Beckmann and Otto Dix, brutally, even grotesquely, depicted the bourgeois society of their time. For these artists beauty was clearly a distraction and contrary to their aims of critical objectivity. Beauty, however, is a value with which the Latin American avant-gardes have found it harder to dispense. In González Palma's work beauty conspires to ennoble his indigenous subjects.Through the rhetorical power of beauty the viewer is rendered more susceptible to fully accept their humanity just as 500 years ago Bartolomé de las Casas gained over a handfull of Spaniards by arguing that the physical slightness of Native-Americans was a sign of nobility. 8   More recently, González Palma has introduced contemporary genetic theory in the work "The image of the world" (1998). For González Palma, the move to dignify and beautify the Native-American subjects of his portraits has the effect of persuading the viewer to move from the factitiousness of their staged personas to the documents that attest to their existence and exploitation. Works such as "Los Recuerdos Intimos" (1991) and more recently, "Letanías con ángel" (1995), depart from an aesthetic heavily dependent on beauty and enter a more current one based on text and evidence. With these latter images Gonzáles Palma pays homage to Christian Boltanski, whose work has had a tremendous impact on his own. 9 In fact, in "Letanías" (1993) as well as in "Letanías con ángel" many id-photos (as in many of Boltanski's works) become blurred to the point of becoming useless as tools of identification. One reading of this feature comes from the tragic futility of looking for "disappeared" ones with id-photos not only in Guatemala but throughout the continent —in a sense, a debunking of the idea that photography's main function is to document and/or identify. Indeed, something as unmimetic and unsensorial as DNA is a better tool for identifying the dead as well as clarifying the kinship of all humans.   That González Palma has not always relied exclusively on an aesthetic of beauty is clearer in his early work where there is even a hint of the grotesque. In "Imágenes de Parto y Dolor" [Images of Child-Bearing and Pain] (1989), or "La Muerte Reyna" [Death Rules] (1989), González Palma exposes his connection Joel-Peter Witkin's work. If only a few of González Palma's images can be regarded as grotesque it is perhaps because since then the rhetoric of beauty was so steadfastly established throughout his opus that it entices the viewer to regard works like "Deer"(1991) and "The Moon"(1989) as something more akin to the sublime than to the grotesque. Beauty, therefore, is also a strategy for persuading the viewer into accepting different paradigms, if not of beauty (whose parameters are historically and ideologically fairly well-defined in spite of the enthusiasm of many who relativize it), then, of artistic representation. González Palma recycles a whole gamut of religious, popular, ancient, mythical, and media icons. In "Loteria I" and "Lotería II," for example, he alludes to the game of lottery whose images —according to María Cristina Orive (one of his first commentators) were used to convert Native-Americans to Catholicism. In order to address issues like emigration, more recent works like "Tensiones herméticas" (1997), leave behind not only beauty but also the representation of Native-Americans as a potentially exotic specimens.   In a way, Gonzáles Palma's eclectic work allows us to discern two epicenters in his artistic persona. One, spelled out by the rhetoric of the titles of his books, exhibits and some of his works (i.e., Poems of Sorrow, Wedding of Solitude, etc.): a modernista à la Rubén Darío 10, with a clear penchant for beauty; and a second one, an avant-garde installation artist à la Boltanski. It is this second aspect of his work that most impressed me about his work in 1992. González Palma irreverently tears photographic prints, nails them to rough supports, collages legal documents and pins ribbons to the prints, invents rituals, uses popular culture, etc. A horde of issues of authenticity, veracity, even morality which photography in the documentary mode had defined within its own paradigm, were thereby forced into revision. González Palma —like Gerardo Suter or Mario Cravo Neto— makes no effort to hide his staging and his choreography and it remains unclear what degree of complicity he has with his subjects who usually include his wife, friends, workers, etc. In a sense, González Palma preempted issues of validation and authenticity. His work in 1992 was in the avante-garde of Latin American photography; and the notion of the avant-garde —is worth remembering— is always contextual. Fernando Castro R. Houston, Texas You may contact Fernando Castro R. at: eusebio9@earthlink.net   1.- The case of "America" (1990) is interesting insofar as the name of the model, who happens to be Gonzealez Palma's godchild, is really "America." Nevertheless, the intention seems to be to depict this girl as a substitute for the 1875 Bartholdi's statue "Liberty" (as-in-the-Statue-of-Liberty) -a mestizo female who is mom representative of the American continent; i.e., one, with Native-American features. A later work, titled "America II" (1998) has a more ironic vein insofar as "America" is inscribed on a heart pin bearing the U.S. flag and adhered to the forehand of a young mestizo. (back)   2.- Hans Namuth. Los Todos Santeros. (Berlin: Verlag Dirk Nishen, 1989). (back)   3. Maria Cristina Orive, essay "Luis Gonzáles Palma" in book Luis Gonziáles Palma (Buenos Aires: La Azotea, 1993), p. 5. (back)   4.- That the most wunterproductiv~ course of action a regime may take against dis,sident an or artists is to repress it is a lesson well-learned by those countries in Latin America that best handle their cultural programs; namely, Cuba and Mexico. In most other countries cultural programs are generally handled by the "unintelligentsia." It is not clear to me whether or not GonzAez Palma's works am considered subversive by the Guatemalan government or power cliques. (back)   5.- The ambiguous meaning of Goyas famous Capricho "El sueno de la razóm produce monstruos" (The dream [slumber] of reason produces monsters) oscillates between two interpretations. The ambiguity arises from the fact that "sueno" means "sleep" as well as "dream." So on the kinder view of reason, if reason sleeps (is not vigilant), monsters arise. On the negative view of reason, its dreams result in terrible excesses -take the cases of the excesses of Robespierre, of Marxist totalitarianism or of free-market predation. (back)   6.- The story of Maximiliano, is one of the strangest in the history of the continent. The idea of Napoleon III was to create an empire made up of European and American countries of Latin culture. It is from this notion that the enigmatic term "Latin America" arose. (back)   7.- "Equally radical is González Palma's approach to beauty. His work is unashamemedly beautiful." See JohnWood' essay "The death of romanticism and the birth of New Science, and the poet of sorrows" in Luis Gonzáles Palma's book Poems of Sorrow (Santa Fe: Arena Editions: 1999), p. 18. (back)   8.- It is also a move not unlike that of the Mexican and Peruvian indigenista avant gardes of the 1920's. The Mexican muralistas aimed to create a public art for and about the oppressed masses, including the indigenous populations. In their works beauty joined forces with epic heroism. Perhaps more akin to González Palma's work is that of Martin Chambi, whose probing work dissected the structure of the 1920's landowning Peruvian society which marginalized Native-Americans -a system of exploitation not very different from present day Guatemala. (back)   9.- Boltanski's installation "Leçons de Tenèbres" [Lessons of darkness] (1986) presented in the cloister space of the Chapelle de l'Hôpital de la Saltpótriere in Paris an array of identification portraits amidst religious statuary and other ecclesiastical paraphernalia. In fact, See, Lynn Gumpert's book Christian Boltanski (Paris: Flammayion: 1994). (back)   10.- Take the following verse of Rubén Dark, with clear resonances in Gozález Palma choice of titles: "voy, ciego y loco, por este mundo arnargo" (I wander, crazy and blind, across the bitter world).(back)         http://www.zonezero.com/magazine/articles/castro/gonzen.html      
Saturday, 01 May 1999
Author:Alexandre Lopes
  Date: Fri, Apr 30, 1999, 8:21 PM   hi my name is alexandre have... 33 years old and i live in belo horizonte, Brasil i shot and process my films always make this i love please let me see your site and tank you first because the recomandation, from: www.clicio.com.br  
Friday, 30 April 1999
Author:María Fernanda Gutiérrez
  Date: Thu, Apr 29, 1999, 4:10 PM   Mi nombre es Fernanda Gutierrez, soy de Guadalajara, Mexico y ahora estoy estudiando en la Universidad de Concordia en Montreal un diplomado en fotografia. Estoy haciendo esto como un hobby pero ahora que lo hago cada vez mas me interesa mejorar cada dia y aprender de todo y de todos. Creo que me motiva el que existan paginas como esta en donde haya trabajos de calidad que me permitan aprender de ellos. Me gustaria saber como estan hechos muchos de ellos pero tal vez ustedes mismos me puedan dar informacion de como encontrar la forma para hacer lo que tengo en la mente.   Gracias.  
Thursday, 29 April 1999
Author:Greta Padilla Velasco
  Date: Thu, Apr 29, 1999, 1:07 PM   Muy estimado Pedro Meyer, mi nombre es Greta Padilla Velasco, he leido algunas secciones de su pagina en internet y me resultan bastante interesantes, el motivo de mi correo es principalmente solicitar informacion con respecto a fotografia digital. la lic. Vera Milarka me recomendo su pagina y me sugirio que le escribiera. La informacion que solicito especificamente es sobre que tipo de analisis puedo hacer sobre imagen digital. ademas si usted me puede sugerir algo de informacion que pueda yo adquirir o algunas paginas especificas en internet que hablen de esto, se lo agradeceria muchisimo  
Thursday, 29 April 1999
Author:Gabino Alvarado Soto
  Date: Wed, Apr 28, 1999, 1:10 PM   Hola me llamo Gabino Alvarado Soto Terminé hace dos semanas la carrera de Comunicación Social En la UAM Xochimilco. Espero poder mantener mantener correo con su persona y dragar lo que más pueda de sus conocimientos; espero no ser muy áspero en mis pretensiones.   De la misma forma quedo a sus ordenes para poder recibir cualquier buena noticia o decepción.  
Wednesday, 28 April 1999
Author:Satsi Acevedo
  Date: Mon, Apr 26, 1999, 12:05 AM   I think this is a really good site to visit. Here I do not have many chances to see good photographs; i am just starting to work on it, and I think that it is good to see other people's work.   Satsi Acevedo Mexico, April 24th, 1999  
Monday, 26 April 1999
Author:Jenett
  Date: Sun, Apr 25, 1999, 8:50 PM   I am pleased to let you know that your site, ZoneZero, was chosen to receive the CoolSTOP Best of the Cool Award for 4/26/99. Your pages stand out because of great graphic design, creativity, easy navigation and original, interesting content. You are listed at http://www.coolstop.com/bestof I am still pleased to list your site as one of the Best of the Cool.   Thanks for putting your site out there - It's Great!  
Sunday, 25 April 1999

<< Start < Prev 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Next > End >>Page 35 of 54


Share This
|
More